█【ANN】【DAPP】█ 🌟🌟🌟 BLOCKLANCER 🌟🌟🌟 ██ JOIN GIG ECONOMY BOOM

[cryptomv3]

Hi! Join  Twitter Campaign!
https://twitter.com/maxim_bezmen

[thealex12]

Why are there no updates in the office?

Please be patient, your stakes might need a little bit more time to update. This is because the team is focusing their hard work on the Alpha release.

My apologies for these delays.

[nordwest]

Why do you do tasks, and the counter costs 0?

[thealex12]

Why do you do tasks, and the counter costs 0?

Your stakes will be updated around once a week

[nothingtosee]

5737sig

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

those freelancers working through your platform, will they get paid in your tokens only?

They will be able to get paid in various cryptocurrencies and perhaps even fiat eventually.

When it comes it dispute resolution by voting on your blockchain, is there a minimum number of votes required to make a decision valid? What if an expected large group of token holders refrains from voting at all?

There will always be votes in our token tribunal. People will vote because they'll receive a payment for that

In this way our token holders make profit holding the LNC token and help by solving disputes.

What if the votes turn out extremely close? Or even result in a draw?

We will always have the exact results, it is very difficult to yo have an exact draw. But if something like that happens the platform holders will find a solution.

How about forcing the amount of voters in the tribunal to be an uneven number to avoid draws?

Of course, that is a way, but I still don't know how exactly this will work.

Hi,
That really a great question.
Should a draw or a close result happen both parties (freelancer+client) have the option to restart the dispute. Most likely the amount of voters was just too low for a valid result.
We are also thinking about a higher instance tribunal to solve such disputes. (freelancer+client are able to execute it after the first dispute)
Also note 90% of the disputes on current websites are very very easy to decide. (Freelancer hadn't finished the job, client doesn't marks the job as completed -> disappeared, Freelancer isn't responding, Freelancer hadn't completed the project before a milestone/deadline, Undeserved bad review from client/freelancer)

Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team

Thanks for the responses.
I had a hunch that that's what most disputes would end up being like, I just tend to like to think about the fringe cases before they occur. Very interesting to see some actual numbers about the dispute cases though!

What would the higher instance tribunals look like?

those freelancers working through your platform, will they get paid in your tokens only?

Hi,
Thanks for the question.
On the Blocklancer platform freelancer are paid in Ether. We also plan to accept Tether(USDT) to reduce the risk of price fluctuations of Ether.
Everything else would be just too big of a hassle for everyone involved. Many people already own Ether why should we use something else?

The biggest advantage of the Lancer Token is that the Token Holder receive 100% of the fees. On top of that the Token Holder are allowed to vote on disputes.

Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team

Have you heard anything about the US regulations that end up treating "profit sharing schemes" as "securities" and thus deeming them illegal, making them unlistable on some of the larger exchanges (in the US)?

And does this concern Blocklancer in any way or would the platform simply operate under a legislature where this problem does not occur in the first place?

[Blocklancer]

those freelancers working through your platform, will they get paid in your tokens only?

They will be able to get paid in various cryptocurrencies and perhaps even fiat eventually.

When it comes it dispute resolution by voting on your blockchain, is there a minimum number of votes required to make a decision valid? What if an expected large group of token holders refrains from voting at all?

There will always be votes in our token tribunal. People will vote because they'll receive a payment for that

In this way our token holders make profit holding the LNC token and help by solving disputes.

What if the votes turn out extremely close? Or even result in a draw?

We will always have the exact results, it is very difficult to yo have an exact draw. But if something like that happens the platform holders will find a solution.

How about forcing the amount of voters in the tribunal to be an uneven number to avoid draws?

Of course, that is a way, but I still don't know how exactly this will work.

Hi,
That really a great question.
Should a draw or a close result happen both parties (freelancer+client) have the option to restart the dispute. Most likely the amount of voters was just too low for a valid result.
We are also thinking about a higher instance tribunal to solve such disputes. (freelancer+client are able to execute it after the first dispute)
Also note 90% of the disputes on current websites are very very easy to decide. (Freelancer hadn't finished the job, client doesn't marks the job as completed -> disappeared, Freelancer isn't responding, Freelancer hadn't completed the project before a milestone/deadline, Undeserved bad review from client/freelancer)

Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team

Thanks for the responses.
I had a hunch that that's what most disputes would end up being like, I just tend to like to think about the fringe cases before they occur. Very interesting to see some actual numbers about the dispute cases though!

What would the higher instance tribunals look like?

those freelancers working through your platform, will they get paid in your tokens only?

Hi,
Thanks for the question.
On the Blocklancer platform freelancer are paid in Ether. We also plan to accept Tether(USDT) to reduce the risk of price fluctuations of Ether.
Everything else would be just too big of a hassle for everyone involved. Many people already own Ether why should we use something else?

The biggest advantage of the Lancer Token is that the Token Holder receive 100% of the fees. On top of that the Token Holder are allowed to vote on disputes.

Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team

Have you heard anything about the US regulations that end up treating "profit sharing schemes" as "securities" and thus deeming them illegal, making them unlistable on some of the larger exchanges (in the US)?

And does this concern Blocklancer in any way or would the platform simply operate under a legislature where this problem does not occur in the first place?

Hi,
There are multiple solutions for the higher instance tribunals. Important to note here is that not every dispute is viewable(voteable) by every token holder. This insures that in the very unlikely case that: Friend A isn't definitely able to vote for Friend B. Which is very unlikely alone due to the fact that friend A would lose LNC but this also solves unrational decisions by token holders. A higher instance tribunal could be that more groups of token holders are allowed to vote on it. Another option is that only the trustworthiest token holder are allowed to vote on a higher instance dispute.

Regarding the profit sharing. Blocklancer has the huge advantage that we give token holder a share for voting on disputes. We are in contact with lawyers because of this because we believe it is very important for everyone involved in Blocklancer to be on the save side.

Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team

[thealex12]

those freelancers working through your platform, will they get paid in your tokens only?

They will be able to get paid in various cryptocurrencies and perhaps even fiat eventually.

When it comes it dispute resolution by voting on your blockchain, is there a minimum number of votes required to make a decision valid? What if an expected large group of token holders refrains from voting at all?

There will always be votes in our token tribunal. People will vote because they'll receive a payment for that

In this way our token holders make profit holding the LNC token and help by solving disputes.

What if the votes turn out extremely close? Or even result in a draw?

We will always have the exact results, it is very difficult to yo have an exact draw. But if something like that happens the platform holders will find a solution.

How about forcing the amount of voters in the tribunal to be an uneven number to avoid draws?

Of course, that is a way, but I still don't know how exactly this will work.

Hi,
That really a great question.
Should a draw or a close result happen both parties (freelancer+client) have the option to restart the dispute. Most likely the amount of voters was just too low for a valid result.
We are also thinking about a higher instance tribunal to solve such disputes. (freelancer+client are able to execute it after the first dispute)
Also note 90% of the disputes on current websites are very very easy to decide. (Freelancer hadn't finished the job, client doesn't marks the job as completed -> disappeared, Freelancer isn't responding, Freelancer hadn't completed the project before a milestone/deadline, Undeserved bad review from client/freelancer)

Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team

Thanks for the responses.
I had a hunch that that's what most disputes would end up being like, I just tend to like to think about the fringe cases before they occur. Very interesting to see some actual numbers about the dispute cases though!

What would the higher instance tribunals look like?

those freelancers working through your platform, will they get paid in your tokens only?

Hi,
Thanks for the question.
On the Blocklancer platform freelancer are paid in Ether. We also plan to accept Tether(USDT) to reduce the risk of price fluctuations of Ether.
Everything else would be just too big of a hassle for everyone involved. Many people already own Ether why should we use something else?

The biggest advantage of the Lancer Token is that the Token Holder receive 100% of the fees. On top of that the Token Holder are allowed to vote on disputes.

Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team

Have you heard anything about the US regulations that end up treating "profit sharing schemes" as "securities" and thus deeming them illegal, making them unlistable on some of the larger exchanges (in the US)?

And does this concern Blocklancer in any way or would the platform simply operate under a legislature where this problem does not occur in the first place?

Hi!

As the Blocklancer account mentioned, they are already talking to lawyers so everything is perfectly legal. And it's right that a token is considered a security when it distributes profit to token holders, but in the case of Blocklancer it is a legal way of distributing profit. How does this happen? Well, a token stops being a security when the holder accomplishes a task for the platform. In the case of Blocklancer the token holders vote to solve disputes. This makes it a legal way of distributing the profit to LNC holders.

[dikan]

When start to ico?

[thealex12]

When start to ico?

This December or in January 2018

[vhns222]

they have made great Pre sale and so big and good promotion, that i think they will rise for a day or days ,and i wait for my bounty reward afther this all.    

[dikan]

When start to ico?

This December or in January 2018

Thanks. still a long time

[Night Hamster]

I joined twitter and facebook campaigns. Team and project are nice. In the belief that everything is beautiful.

[GeorgiyBilyk]

5710sig

[easyrimka]

hi , whats the next date for the update of stakes ? mine were not updated since 10 days, do i need to send a pm ? thanks !

[thealex12]

hi , whats the next date for the update of stakes ? mine were not updated since 10 days, do i need to send a pm ? thanks !

Hi!

The team always tries to update your stakes as soon as possible, I can't really tell you an exact date.

But don't worry you will receive them for sure.

[BTCMILLIONAIRE]

Hi,
Thanks for the question.
On the Blocklancer platform freelancer are paid in Ether. We also plan to accept Tether(USDT) to reduce the risk of price fluctuations of Ether.
Everything else would be just too big of a hassle for everyone involved. Many people already own Ether why should we use something else?

The biggest advantage of the Lancer Token is that the Token Holder receive 100% of the fees. On top of that the Token Holder are allowed to vote on disputes.

Best regards,
The Blocklancer Team

Have you heard anything about the US regulations that end up treating "profit sharing schemes" as "securities" and thus deeming them illegal, making them unlistable on some of the larger exchanges (in the US)?

And does this concern Blocklancer in any way or would the platform simply operate under a legislature where this problem does not occur in the first place?

Hi!

As the Blocklancer account mentioned, they are already talking to lawyers so everything is perfectly legal. And it's right that a token is considered a security when it distributes profit to token holders, but in the case of Blocklancer it is a legal way of distributing profit. How does this happen? Well, a token stops being a security when the holder accomplishes a task for the platform. In the case of Blocklancer the token holders vote to solve disputes. This makes it a legal way of distributing the profit to LNC holders.

Very interesting workaround. Thanks for both responses by the way. You guys keep reinforcing my trust in Blocklancer, seeing how you've apparently had thought through every question before I even asked it so far, which is something very few projects are capable of in this market.

[Blocklancer]

Partnership Announcement: Blocklancer and HOQU partner

[soramon]

Hi!
i joined signature campaign since jr member. now im member rank now , can i change the signature ? Thanks!

[thealex12]

Hi!
i joined signature campaign since jr member. now im member rank now , can i change the signature ? Thanks!

Hello,

Your rank will be updated automatically.