Dxdiax26
|
|
December 18, 2017, 07:01:46 PM |
|
A good project for the future makes sense if it takes a long time, I hope that the blocklancer project will soon be realized and publicly marketed for the development of blocklancers.
|
|
|
|
thealex12
|
|
December 18, 2017, 09:15:31 PM |
|
Welcome to everyone that joined us today!!
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
December 18, 2017, 09:47:55 PM |
|
Been gone for a few days and noticed the last question regarding the LNC token utility aspect.
Are 100% of the fees going to be distributed among tribunal voters? Or is a part going to token holders in a way that a dividend would be distributed?
Also, since Ethereum had some major issues with that crypto kitty game (which only added 7~8 tx/sec to the blockchain), do you intend to implement further currencies for paying in the future if the slow transcations become an issue? The new Waves platform already supports over 100 tx/sec and can go up to ~1000 tx/sec, which is quite a leap from what Ethereum offers right now. Without a doubt the ERC20 blockchain will get upgraded down the line and you've already mentioned potential fiat gateways, but this in general still is something that is unclear to me.
Have the new technical papers been released yet by the way?
Hi, I don't believe that it is currently a huge problem because if I make a quick calculation. If we add 1 transaction per second to the Ethereum Blockchain we generate 86400 transactions (60*60*24) per day. On current freelancing platforms every job has at max ~3 bids which results in 6 transactions per job (1x creation, 3x bid, 1x accepting, 1x payout). If we divide the transactions per day (86400) by the amount of transactions per job we get the result of 14400 jobs per day. As comparison Freelancer.com currently handles ~8600 jobs per day. This proves very well that we don't need that many transactions as for example a decentralized exchange . All fees are distributed to the voter in the Tokenholder Tribunal to encourage voting on the platform. Regarding Waves, it is currently no solution because they don't support smart contracts as of now but I will keep an eye on them. Other currencies are no problem to implement especially Ethereum Tokens. The new whitepaper is already released you can find it here. Thanks for your great question and best regards, The Blocklancer Team I'm mostly concerned about Ethereum breaking down again and causing delays for freelancers and clients. Or at least I was until I saw your calculations. If Ethereum doesn't upgrade its transaction throughput significantly, Blocklancer could actually end up congesting it on its own. With the Freelancer market growing at a rapid pace filling up 14400 jobs a day doesn't seem like a too outlandish target, especially if campaign managers ended up throwing their bounties onto Blocklancer to ensure that the people that join their bounty campaigns are of a high calibre. Fortunately that's still a few years into the future though, so by then ERC20 should be much more efficient than it is right now. With fees being distributed to the voters, would that (in analogy) make the voters similar to miners on traditional PoW blockchains? E.g. with difficulty being the amount of votes, rewards being the amount of fees and hashrate being the amount of tokens held by a given voter? Thanks for the Whitepaper, will be reading through it over the holidays.
|
|
|
|
|
extrogel
|
|
December 19, 2017, 04:53:29 AM |
|
I've joined Twitter and Facebook bounty campaign my username : extrogel
|
|
|
|
Blocklancer (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Blocklancer - Freelance on the Blockchain
|
|
December 19, 2017, 03:55:49 PM |
|
Been gone for a few days and noticed the last question regarding the LNC token utility aspect.
Are 100% of the fees going to be distributed among tribunal voters? Or is a part going to token holders in a way that a dividend would be distributed?
Also, since Ethereum had some major issues with that crypto kitty game (which only added 7~8 tx/sec to the blockchain), do you intend to implement further currencies for paying in the future if the slow transcations become an issue? The new Waves platform already supports over 100 tx/sec and can go up to ~1000 tx/sec, which is quite a leap from what Ethereum offers right now. Without a doubt the ERC20 blockchain will get upgraded down the line and you've already mentioned potential fiat gateways, but this in general still is something that is unclear to me.
Have the new technical papers been released yet by the way?
Hi, I don't believe that it is currently a huge problem because if I make a quick calculation. If we add 1 transaction per second to the Ethereum Blockchain we generate 86400 transactions (60*60*24) per day. On current freelancing platforms every job has at max ~3 bids which results in 6 transactions per job (1x creation, 3x bid, 1x accepting, 1x payout). If we divide the transactions per day (86400) by the amount of transactions per job we get the result of 14400 jobs per day. As comparison Freelancer.com currently handles ~8600 jobs per day. This proves very well that we don't need that many transactions as for example a decentralized exchange . All fees are distributed to the voter in the Tokenholder Tribunal to encourage voting on the platform. Regarding Waves, it is currently no solution because they don't support smart contracts as of now but I will keep an eye on them. Other currencies are no problem to implement especially Ethereum Tokens. The new whitepaper is already released you can find it here. Thanks for your great question and best regards, The Blocklancer Team I'm mostly concerned about Ethereum breaking down again and causing delays for freelancers and clients. Or at least I was until I saw your calculations. If Ethereum doesn't upgrade its transaction throughput significantly, Blocklancer could actually end up congesting it on its own. With the Freelancer market growing at a rapid pace filling up 14400 jobs a day doesn't seem like a too outlandish target, especially if campaign managers ended up throwing their bounties onto Blocklancer to ensure that the people that join their bounty campaigns are of a high calibre. Fortunately that's still a few years into the future though, so by then ERC20 should be much more efficient than it is right now. With fees being distributed to the voters, would that (in analogy) make the voters similar to miners on traditional PoW blockchains? E.g. with difficulty being the amount of votes, rewards being the amount of fees and hashrate being the amount of tokens held by a given voter? Thanks for the Whitepaper, will be reading through it over the holidays. Hi, Yes you're completely right with your comparison it is the same concept as Proof of Stake with the only exception that you solve disputes in exchange of transactions. A Proof of Vote system so to say. Actually we talked the very same in the office a few months ago with the only exception that we compared it with Proof of Stake and not Proof of Work. Best regards, The Blocklancer Team
|
|
|
|
vladislav.o
|
|
December 20, 2017, 02:38:08 AM Last edit: December 20, 2017, 02:49:04 AM by vladislav.o |
|
Good afternoon everyone !!!!! I understand the bounty is moving to the logical conclusion !!!! Will all the work be taken into account or in a deal with the accountant And so there are no questions to this project, everyone's patience and let's share the top project of 2017
|
|
|
|
thealex12
|
|
December 20, 2017, 06:47:35 AM |
|
Good afternoon everyone !!!!! I understand the bounty is moving to the logical conclusion !!!! Will all the work be taken into account or in a deal with the accountant And so there are no questions to this project, everyone's patience and let's share the top project of 2017 Hello vladilav.o, Thanks for your lovely words, the stakes will be updated in the portal very soon. Usually we update once a week, but it might take a little longer.
|
|
|
|
Glor45
|
|
December 20, 2017, 01:07:18 PM |
|
6513sig
|
|
|
|
freelotus
|
|
December 20, 2017, 02:39:58 PM |
|
Let me ask you a question. I joined the company's bounty on Twitter and registered at https://blocklancer.net/accounts/profile/twitter_bounty. Do I need to pass reports on the work done because I do not see the accrual of Stakes? Can you check if I'm still a member of the bounty?
|
|
|
|
aroweyen
|
|
December 20, 2017, 03:30:51 PM |
|
Let me ask you a question. I joined the company's bounty on Twitter and registered at https://blocklancer.net/accounts/profile/twitter_bounty. Do I need to pass reports on the work done because I do not see the accrual of Stakes? Can you check if I'm still a member of the bounty? I have the same question like him, I'm also wondering if we need to pass reports or do we have to wait for few days before stakes updates?
|
|
|
|
Blocklancer (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Blocklancer - Freelance on the Blockchain
|
|
December 20, 2017, 04:02:53 PM |
|
Let me ask you a question. I joined the company's bounty on Twitter and registered at https://blocklancer.net/accounts/profile/twitter_bounty. Do I need to pass reports on the work done because I do not see the accrual of Stakes? Can you check if I'm still a member of the bounty? I have the same question like him, I'm also wondering if we need to pass reports or do we have to wait for few days before stakes updates? Hi, You don't need to report anything. You only need to wait a few more days because of the low facebook/twitter api limit. Best regards, The Blocklancer Team
|
|
|
|
yanis007
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2017, 09:09:29 AM |
|
Russian_W_6529
|
|
|
|
PERtua
|
|
December 21, 2017, 09:22:52 AM |
|
Let me ask you a question. I joined the company's bounty on Twitter and registered at https://blocklancer.net/accounts/profile/twitter_bounty. Do I need to pass reports on the work done because I do not see the accrual of Stakes? Can you check if I'm still a member of the bounty? I have the same question like him, I'm also wondering if we need to pass reports or do we have to wait for few days before stakes updates? Hi, You don't need to report anything. You only need to wait a few more days because of the low facebook/twitter api limit. Best regards, The Blocklancer Team thanks for this update dev. i even thought that we must need to have a weekly report or bubmitt a report for the social media bounty. it is good to know that you have an api to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
thealex12
|
|
December 21, 2017, 06:29:54 PM |
|
The easier way to submit is by connecting directly at the portal. Thanks for joining!!
|
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
December 22, 2017, 12:05:13 AM |
|
Been gone for a few days and noticed the last question regarding the LNC token utility aspect.
Are 100% of the fees going to be distributed among tribunal voters? Or is a part going to token holders in a way that a dividend would be distributed?
Also, since Ethereum had some major issues with that crypto kitty game (which only added 7~8 tx/sec to the blockchain), do you intend to implement further currencies for paying in the future if the slow transcations become an issue? The new Waves platform already supports over 100 tx/sec and can go up to ~1000 tx/sec, which is quite a leap from what Ethereum offers right now. Without a doubt the ERC20 blockchain will get upgraded down the line and you've already mentioned potential fiat gateways, but this in general still is something that is unclear to me.
Have the new technical papers been released yet by the way?
Hi, I don't believe that it is currently a huge problem because if I make a quick calculation. If we add 1 transaction per second to the Ethereum Blockchain we generate 86400 transactions (60*60*24) per day. On current freelancing platforms every job has at max ~3 bids which results in 6 transactions per job (1x creation, 3x bid, 1x accepting, 1x payout). If we divide the transactions per day (86400) by the amount of transactions per job we get the result of 14400 jobs per day. As comparison Freelancer.com currently handles ~8600 jobs per day. This proves very well that we don't need that many transactions as for example a decentralized exchange . All fees are distributed to the voter in the Tokenholder Tribunal to encourage voting on the platform. Regarding Waves, it is currently no solution because they don't support smart contracts as of now but I will keep an eye on them. Other currencies are no problem to implement especially Ethereum Tokens. The new whitepaper is already released you can find it here. Thanks for your great question and best regards, The Blocklancer Team I'm mostly concerned about Ethereum breaking down again and causing delays for freelancers and clients. Or at least I was until I saw your calculations. If Ethereum doesn't upgrade its transaction throughput significantly, Blocklancer could actually end up congesting it on its own. With the Freelancer market growing at a rapid pace filling up 14400 jobs a day doesn't seem like a too outlandish target, especially if campaign managers ended up throwing their bounties onto Blocklancer to ensure that the people that join their bounty campaigns are of a high calibre. Fortunately that's still a few years into the future though, so by then ERC20 should be much more efficient than it is right now. With fees being distributed to the voters, would that (in analogy) make the voters similar to miners on traditional PoW blockchains? E.g. with difficulty being the amount of votes, rewards being the amount of fees and hashrate being the amount of tokens held by a given voter? Thanks for the Whitepaper, will be reading through it over the holidays. Hi, Yes you're completely right with your comparison it is the same concept as Proof of Stake with the only exception that you solve disputes in exchange of transactions. A Proof of Vote system so to say. Actually we talked the very same in the office a few months ago with the only exception that we compared it with Proof of Stake and not Proof of Work. Best regards, The Blocklancer Team Ah, using PoS as an analogy actually makes more sense since it's much closer than PoW. I'm just way too used to mining so I thought of the PoW comparison first. Glad to see you made the same analogy, further evidence that your team is well versed in all things crypto. By the way, do we know how long the ICO is going to last yet once it goes live?
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
December 22, 2017, 12:05:55 AM |
|
The shares don't update in realtime. Just be patient, you can rest assured that you will get your stakes and your bounty in due time.
|
|
|
|
Krystal_kim21
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 11
|
|
December 22, 2017, 12:00:17 PM |
|
This my first time regist through portal. Wish I didn't made some mistakes
|
|
|
|
|