Just got banned from bitmixer campaign and have a question

[fireball4]

How is this guys posts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=176777;sa=showPosts are better than mine? Because he's in the campaign shitposting for a while already.

[1715055247]

1715055247

[1715055247]

1715055247

[1715055247]

1715055247

[1715055247]

1715055247

[1715055247]

1715055247

[1715055247]

1715055247

[Qartada]

It's nothing to do with your posts.  You could have noticed what it was about if you'd bothered to read the signature campaign thread.

fireball4** #Farmed account most likely not in possesion of original owner.

[bL4nkcode]

Maybe the main reason for that quoted text above is this phrases on your trust page (quoted below). That's why...

This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.

 Maybe you should PM the campaign manager for this and explain that you're the real owner of this account. Signed message is a must.

[HabBear]

Maybe you should PM the campaign manager for this and explain that you're the real owner of this account. Signed message is a must.

If you read the campaign thread you'll find all the rules. You have to read more than just the original post.

If you weren't banned from the campaign (and just removed) you'll have the opportunity to appeal after 60 days. If you contact or request review before 60 days you'll significantly hurt your chances of any consideration to get readmitted.

I don't know if you bought this account or not...and I don't know what Lauda's opinion is on those types of accounts. What I do know is the long period of inactivity is a HUGE RED FLAG of breaking a rule that is meant to keep previously banned members of this forum away from participating in the forum. You should find out how long it takes for your inactivity warning to retire. And if you did buy this account, you shouldn't use it for a signature campaign.

Follow the rules and you'll get to enjoy this privilege. It is a privilege.

[nethan1btc]

Mate, you just have to follow the rules of the campaign stated by the manager and based on the comments I had read from the forum members here, I've seen all of them to be reliable and you should follow them. Don't ever commit that mistake again and prevent spamming of post as well as off topic section which mainly stated on the rules of bimixer; must have your post to be constructive and on topic.

[djgtr]

Maybe you should PM the campaign manager for this and explain that you're the real owner of this account. Signed message is a must.

If you read the campaign thread you'll find all the rules. You have to read more than just the original post.

If you weren't banned from the campaign (and just removed) you'll have the opportunity to appeal after 60 days. If you contact or request review before 60 days you'll significantly hurt your chances of any consideration to get readmitted.

I don't know if you bought this account or not...and I don't know what Lauda's opinion is on those types of accounts. What I do know is the long period of inactivity is a HUGE RED FLAG of breaking a rule that is meant to keep previously banned members of this forum away from participating in the forum. You should find out how long it takes for your inactivity warning to retire. And if you did buy this account, you shouldn't use it for a signature campaign.

Follow the rules and you'll get to enjoy this privilege. It is a privilege.

I see that the manager's decision is to be followed and be respected by most of the forum member, and as I see the reputation of the manager is very well trusted. Some members have their own sentiments about the character imposed to the offender of the rules, but I see that she has a deeper reasons and proof why he banned your account in the forum. So if were you, the next time you join a signature campaign; you must be a rule abiding member and avoid spamming and low post quality.

[spngebob]

How is this guys posts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=176777;sa=showPosts are better than mine? Because he's in the campaign shitposting for a while already.

I think i know what is problem here.
If you look at your post history, you build your account with one line posts which is considered as spam just to build up rank to senior, and then you just thought joining bitmixer campaign is good idea to do - which wasn't. You should be happy you didn't receive negative trust for such behavior.

[ultrloa]

How is this guys posts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=176777;sa=showPosts are better than mine? Because he's in the campaign shitposting for a while already.

Don't compare yourself to any of participants there since at the first place you are the one who's making the post here and you can actually see those rules set by lauda here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1741988 so that you may have some idea on why you had banned on that campaign  and also surely that guy you have link onhere will be banned if lauda will see him unquality poster.

[ImHash]

You have an activity score equal to your post count which most of the times is an indication of farmed accounts, yet you are tolerable I saw a few people posting like how horny rabbits fu*k every 1-2 minutes and 40-50 posts, I really rolled on the floor laughing, at least they made me feel lighter.

[botany]

How is this guys posts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=176777;sa=showPosts are better than mine? Because he's in the campaign shitposting for a while already.

If you do want to convince Lauda that you don't have a farmed account, post in the Bitmixer thread and make your case.
Comparing yourself with other signature campaign participants isn't going to help.

[SONG GEET]

You got banned from campaign because you are suspected of using farmed account to participate in the campaign. If you want to learn more about farmed account make a search, most of the farmed accounts are involved in shit posting and might have multiple alts that's the reason for most of the campaign manager trying to banned such accounts.