Bounty: Rivetz Security Project - Earn With your Support

[marilyngroom]

I know there's only two days left for the ICO, but I'm willing to join the campaign. Sure it won't be much, but I like the coin and I'm bored.

Edit: I would have to write 50 posts in two days. So that's a no go. I'm always late.

[Mihaylovic]

This is funny b9unty campaign. First managed by jamal and no update. And then irfan_pak shows up and when he shows up many people got rejection and yes of course people who rejected change their signature. Now this moron write the reason of rejection with not using signature..

Congratulation for very worst bounty manager

We can not really help those who do not really read the updates. We have posted that update everywhere, bold and in red color. Now who is the real "moron".

Hey Campaign-manager

I red in the sprearsheet that i will get 85 stakes from the signatur campaign, that's exactly the same as someone who joined 7 weeks later  

I joined 5. July and the other user 24.august.

How is this possible, how is it calculated?

Actually, these rules are made by the previous manager. And If i change these rules in the mid, everyone will show up here and say neg.

So i believe the rule should be like this

Jr Member and Member: 15 Stakes / week
Full Member: 30 Stakes / week
Sr Member: 50 Stakes / week
Hero and Legendary: 80 Stakes / week

Here, / week is NOT mentioned in OP. I think it should be changed to make it best for everyone. Otherwise, it will be an injustice with those who joined it from the beginning.

Please VOTE for it, So I can change it ASAP.

Regards

I ve been in this signature campaign for 2 months. Waiting for so long time patiently to support the project. And there are people joined 10 days ago and they got the same stakes as me. it is not fair at all. But if we vote it, everybody will vote for themself. You should decide it by yourself if it is fair or not as the bounty manager.

[BitcoinPanther]

This is funny b9unty campaign. First managed by jamal and no update. And then irfan_pak shows up and when he shows up many people got rejection and yes of course people who rejected change their signature. Now this moron write the reason of rejection with not using signature..

Congratulation for very worst bounty manager

We can not really help those who do not really read the updates. We have posted that update everywhere, bold and in red color. Now who is the real "moron".

Hey Campaign-manager

I red in the sprearsheet that i will get 85 stakes from the signatur campaign, that's exactly the same as someone who joined 7 weeks later  

I joined 5. July and the other user 24.august.

How is this possible, how is it calculated?

Actually, these rules are made by the previous manager. And If i change these rules in the mid, everyone will show up here and say neg.

So i believe the rule should be like this

Jr Member and Member: 15 Stakes / week
Full Member: 30 Stakes / week
Sr Member: 50 Stakes / week
Hero and Legendary: 80 Stakes / week

Here, / week is NOT mentioned in OP. I think it should be changed to make it best for everyone. Otherwise, it will be an injustice with those who joined it from the beginning.

Please VOTE for it, So I can change it ASAP.

Regards

I ve been in this signature campaign for 2 months. Waiting for so long time patiently to support the project. And there are people joined 10 days ago and they got the same stakes as me. it is not fair at all. But if we vote it, everybody will vote for themself. You should decide it by yourself if it is fair or not as the bounty manager.

I will accept whatever the bounty manager decided . I believe Irfan knows what he is doing. 

[ragavancoin]

This is funny b9unty campaign. First managed by jamal and no update. And then irfan_pak shows up and when he shows up many people got rejection and yes of course people who rejected change their signature. Now this moron write the reason of rejection with not using signature..

Congratulation for very worst bounty manager

We can not really help those who do not really read the updates. We have posted that update everywhere, bold and in red color. Now who is the real "moron".

Hey Campaign-manager

I red in the sprearsheet that i will get 85 stakes from the signatur campaign, that's exactly the same as someone who joined 7 weeks later 

I joined 5. July and the other user 24.august.

How is this possible, how is it calculated?

Actually, these rules are made by the previous manager. And If i change these rules in the mid, everyone will show up here and say neg.

So i believe the rule should be like this

Jr Member and Member: 15 Stakes / week
Full Member: 30 Stakes / week
Sr Member: 50 Stakes / week
Hero and Legendary: 80 Stakes / week

Here, / week is NOT mentioned in OP. I think it should be changed to make it best for everyone. Otherwise, it will be an injustice with those who joined it from the beginning.

Please VOTE for it, So I can change it ASAP.

Regards

Yes going to vote for this with weekly base stakes because of some people joined this campaign very beginning like more two months they are supporting, but some people joined before 15 days back they're also supporting this project, so they will get equal stakes it's not fair I think weekly base is best.

[Xavier59]

Well, I also vote to change the rule. That is pretty unfair for those who were in since the first days.
I have posted more than 150+ message since I'm in and I have supported the campaign for 2 months. Could be fair to pay us on a week bases.
We, the early adopters, took risk (Remember, rivetz started badly, the ico was reported, the thread nearly inactive and we got no news for at least 2 weeks). We took risk.
Then, some random people show up 1 week before the end, take 0 risk because the ICO was already a success, spam 50 messages and get the same rewards ? :-/

[LGD2Business]

Yes, week based stakes would be more appropriate. There should be a difference between 2 months user and 2 weeks user. Please count stakes X week.

[babar123]

i agree that it would be really unfair for those who subscribed in the ico one day ago and those who did 2 months ago to receive the same stake, so i vote for counting the number of weeks, as my previous mates said

[Brightdhykseen]

please i want to update my ETH address for the bounty campaign. My previous address got compromised yesterday
username: brightdhykseen
email: bdhykseen@gmail.com
old ETH address: 0xd549db4c3f75f882b868a99943175c285bc53632
New Address: 0xC20D87d300c2571ea47f1Eb257971dbDCA6FaDCD

i Participated in blog bounty, Media and Facebook
In Blog and Media, No#262,#263,#264, #325 ,#379 ,#397
Facebook: #963

Thank you for your support

[iqbal26]

Hey Campaign-manager

I red in the sprearsheet that i will get 85 stakes from the signatur campaign, that's exactly the same as someone who joined 7 weeks later  

I joined 5. July and the other user 24.august.

How is this possible, how is it calculated?

Actually, these rules are made by the previous manager. And If i change these rules in the mid, everyone will show up here and say neg.

So i believe the rule should be like this

Jr Member and Member: 15 Stakes / week
Full Member: 30 Stakes / week
Sr Member: 50 Stakes / week
Hero and Legendary: 80 Stakes / week

Here, / week is NOT mentioned in OP. I think it should be changed to make it best for everyone. Otherwise, it will be an injustice with those who joined it from the beginning.

Please VOTE for it, So I can change it ASAP.

Regards

i think jamal just forget make stakes/week (i know because all rules for jamal used stakes perweek)
unfair if stake same for ppl join 7 days with 2 month

Look old spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ONNw53fySvp4w7vTW9DW6MRLXbvPWTivnDP0uA77jEg/edit#gid=1595715270
have form total weeks for joining

[btvGainer]

Though i am not a signature participant yet I vote for weekly stakes

[nor9854]

I also vote for weekly stakes

[DGulari]

Though i am not a signature participant yet I vote for weekly stakes

I'm not one of rivetz participants either, but i would like to vote weekly stakes.

[NewsBounty]

why no updates on spreadsheets?

[digiworld1]

dev: Can you please check, I joined slack but did not fill out the form.
Thank you Dev!

[denetci]

i vote for weekly changes.

[rizkyrz]

when is the date of certainty for you to update the final spreadsheet of all bounty? because all participants are very much waiting for the announcement.

[Vinalians]

For me also i voted the weekly stakes that is more fair than those who are just join in 2 weeks and done the 50 post count because it is so unfair for the earliest participants here because they are promoting the rivetz in the first place in a very early stage of it.

[ResponsibleMan]

I'm one of the first Signature participants and I've been supporting the project for more than 2 months. I think the more weeks a participant has been in the campaign the more stakes he shoud get. That would be fair.

[mitchr4]

I do not even know why you changed the rules again but it does not seem fair to the participants who have been joining for a long time in this campaign. We just see the decision of the participants who join in this campaign. What's best for them

[wildan88]

I vote for weekly because it's fair.