|
Bitcoin!
|
 |
March 30, 2014, 07:11:54 PM |
|
|
Report to moderator _///// [XVG] ★★★★★WE ARE ON THE VERGE ★★★★★ [SCRYPT] /////_ _//// TOR // I2P // LINUX . WINDOWS . MAC . ANDROID . ELECTRUM . WEBWALLET . GITHUB // WEBSITE // RADIO // IRC ////_ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Gliss (OP)
|
|
March 31, 2014, 03:57:03 AM |
|
suggestion:
It would be great to see a chart for Total Market Cap (at the bottom).
Even better, it could have 2 lines: one for total market cap, but also one for bitcoin's market cap. That way you could visualize the gap between all altcoins and bitcoin, to see if altcoin market is growing or not (ie the gap gets bigger over time?)
Great idea. I'm in the process of revamping the site, so expect to see some new features in the near future. Not all "premines" are necessarily bad. Not all alt-coins are crap. Let the market decide. I'm wondering how much Solarcoin is a factor in this myself.  Listen, there's no perfect way to do this. Yes, premined coins which are held in reserve can make a coin appear higher in the rankings. However, that's really irrelevant, because if all of those premined coins were dumped on the market at once, the coin would drop to the bottom of the rankings. There's no way to know how many coins are available. You just don't know who owns them and what their intention is. You can look at the blockchain and see total supply, and you can look at the exchanges and see price. Everything else is conjecture. Sure, make an option to filter out coins with sizable premines, just like you can filter out non-minable coins. Coinmarketcap is a cool site and I check it daily. Keep up the good work. This is how I feel. All coins deserve to be listed, it's just a matter of presenting the information that's fair and consistent. Adding filters just feels like a bandaid to me and is not a real long term solution. My comment is aimed at the bold section in markymarks post. You are adressing the issue there. If the premined coins had been in sirculation the price would not have been the same. That is exactly why the premine cant be a part of the marketcap. Regarding auroracoin you can fix it really easy. Auroracoin got a counter at their webpage with the number of realeased coins from the premine. Update the total number of coins a few times every week and you have the real data and the real marketcap. I thought about the Auroracoin fix, but what if the other country coins don't give out the number released info? on the new charts, there is a blue line for price, yellow for market cap
they overlap nearly 100% most of the time.. but sometimes there is a gap between them (see AUR right now)
what does that gap signify?
The coins are being distributed at a faster pace than the price is dropping? Yeah probably. Since marketcap is based on total supply, and the total supply (usually) changes slowly over time, there might be a slight difference. I'll be the first to admit that I don't understand the technicalities on an API. But if there is a technical reason why Allcrypt was removed from the market feed for SLR, then it needs to be fixed. It was there yesterday, all day. Allcrypt counts for 95% of the volume of SLR and is actively traded on that exchange. The $US trade volume for the past 24 hours at current levels is 380,115 shares X 0.00001850 BTC = 7.03 BTC, well over $3000 a day. The correct value! This puts SLR at rank #52 when sorted by daily trade volume!!! But you are showing $24 instead because you removed Allcrypt from the feeds and are only using Bittrex. Seriously, WTF is going on??? Allcrypt was being used all day yesterday and last night, now it's removed? If you purposefully removed Allcrypt from the feeds for SLR, then you need to come up with one helluva good reason for doing so. I sure can't think of one. Here is what I think happened: Last night the volume spiked as a miner came in to take profits. The price got pushed down to 800 satoshis and after the miner was done, rallied right back up to 2000 satoshis. If you do the math on this for the last 24 hour period, the only thing that would have happened is that SLR no longer fit the 0.001% of trade volume restriction and SHOULD have been moved from the "Low Volume" section into the regular listings, according to your own criteria. But rather than do that, you just removed Allcrypt from the feeds. Sound about right???  I didn't remove anything, it was probably an API issue. It seems resolved now though. Thanks, but these APIs have already been integrated. |
|
|
|
|
omahapoker
|
|
March 31, 2014, 05:02:25 AM |
|
congrats on making $20,000+ a month in ads. I've watched you from the beginning and great to see your site succeed  |
|
|
|
|
|
counter
|
|
March 31, 2014, 08:30:30 AM |
|
Wow 20 G's from ads is remakable if you ask me. Kudos are in order for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shtako
|
|
March 31, 2014, 05:18:19 PM |
|
Not all "premines" are necessarily bad. Not all alt-coins are crap. Let the market decide. I'm wondering how much Solarcoin is a factor in this myself. Listen, there's no perfect way to do this. Yes, premined coins which are held in reserve can make a coin appear higher in the rankings. However, that's really irrelevant, because if all of those premined coins were dumped on the market at once, the coin would drop to the bottom of the rankings. There's no way to know how many coins are available. You just don't know who owns them and what their intention is. You can look at the blockchain and see total supply, and you can look at the exchanges and see price. Everything else is conjecture. Sure, make an option to filter out coins with sizable premines, just like you can filter out non-minable coins. Coinmarketcap is a cool site and I check it daily. Keep up the good work. This is how I feel. All coins deserve to be listed, it's just a matter of presenting the information that's fair and consistent. Adding filters just feels like a bandaid to me and is not a real long term solution. My comment is aimed at the bold section in markymarks post. You are adressing the issue there. If the premined coins had been in sirculation the price would not have been the same. That is exactly why the premine cant be a part of the marketcap. Regarding auroracoin you can fix it really easy. Auroracoin got a counter at their webpage with the number of realeased coins from the premine. Update the total number of coins a few times every week and you have the real data and the real marketcap. I thought about the Auroracoin fix, but what if the other country coins don't give out the number released info? Don't underestimate the impact and importance of your site. It is one of the most important and informative sites in crypto. Media use it, and most people interested have the site bookmarked. If you remove the premine from the premined coins my guess is that the coins interested in staying high on your list will provide similiar data about the distribution as auroacoin. |
|
|
|
|
|
emelac
|
|
March 31, 2014, 05:40:32 PM |
|
Not all "premines" are necessarily bad. Not all alt-coins are crap. Let the market decide. I'm wondering how much Solarcoin is a factor in this myself. Listen, there's no perfect way to do this. Yes, premined coins which are held in reserve can make a coin appear higher in the rankings. However, that's really irrelevant, because if all of those premined coins were dumped on the market at once, the coin would drop to the bottom of the rankings. There's no way to know how many coins are available. You just don't know who owns them and what their intention is. You can look at the blockchain and see total supply, and you can look at the exchanges and see price. Everything else is conjecture. Sure, make an option to filter out coins with sizable premines, just like you can filter out non-minable coins. Coinmarketcap is a cool site and I check it daily. Keep up the good work. This is how I feel. All coins deserve to be listed, it's just a matter of presenting the information that's fair and consistent. Adding filters just feels like a bandaid to me and is not a real long term solution. My comment is aimed at the bold section in markymarks post. You are adressing the issue there. If the premined coins had been in sirculation the price would not have been the same. That is exactly why the premine cant be a part of the marketcap. Regarding auroracoin you can fix it really easy. Auroracoin got a counter at their webpage with the number of realeased coins from the premine. Update the total number of coins a few times every week and you have the real data and the real marketcap. I thought about the Auroracoin fix, but what if the other country coins don't give out the number released info? Don't underestimate the impact and importance of your site. It is one of the most important and informative sites in crypto. Media use it, and most people interested have the site bookmarked. If you remove the premine from the premined coins my guess is that the coins interested in staying high on your list will provide similiar data about the distribution as auroacoin. Your site was one of the first ones I found when I first took an interest in alt coins. I have searched for better alternatives and found none anywhere. In my opinion your site is the best resource for comparing coin capitalizations and prices available. |
|
|
|
|
nigeriacoin
Member
 Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
March 31, 2014, 06:45:09 PM |
|
Please add NigeriaCoin. We filled out the form with the required information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pwoods
|
|
March 31, 2014, 07:29:50 PM |
|
|
SMB: SKSPFAHG17xy3rngPhC3Z7yxex8Fkfcsei
|
|
|
~Coinseeker~
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
March 31, 2014, 07:38:06 PM |
|
Coinmarketcap.com has become a complete and total resource for all cryptocurrencies. Not biased for or against any coin and being able to filter "pre-mine" is great. Best way to stay true to the facts and still give people choice in how to view the data. If it's a math-based currency, it gets listed, regardless of personal opinions. I love it! This is why they are and will remain the trusted source. Way to go guys.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
omahapoker
|
|
April 01, 2014, 03:55:00 AM |
|
so many coins noe very hard to keep track. i just look at coins with the most trading vol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teodor
|
|
April 01, 2014, 03:55:48 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DianaLime
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:03:44 AM |
|
I love coinmarketcap!
|
|
|
|
|
|
buddynuno
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:27:48 AM |
|
I love coinmarketcap!
I don't because you have coins like SiliconValleyCoin which are including the premined coins with a market cap of $ 5,365,579 trading 1900$ USD 24h volume in 12th place on the ranking and then you have Solarcoin which they are including the premined coins with a market cap of $ 641,392,564 with 1500$ USD 24h volume in 139th place on the ranking!!! That I call cheating for whatever reasons or agendas coinmarketcap might have to provide false information to the public!!! Comments? |
|
|
|
pabloangello
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 02, 2014, 11:29:11 AM |
|
Hello Coinmarketcap dev.
Could you please make it possible to switch coins charts from USD to BTC like on the main page with prices?
|
|
|
|
|
Gliss (OP)
|
|
April 02, 2014, 12:12:24 PM |
|
New coins coming tonight hopefully. Added, thanks! Hello Coinmarketcap dev.
Could you please make it possible to switch coins charts from USD to BTC like on the main page with prices?
Working on it. I love coinmarketcap!
I don't because you have coins like SiliconValleyCoin which are including the premined coins with a market cap of $ 5,365,579 trading 1900$ USD 24h volume in 12th place on the ranking and then you have Solarcoin which they are including the premined coins with a market cap of $ 641,392,564 with 1500$ USD 24h volume in 139th place on the ranking!!! That I call cheating for whatever reasons or agendas coinmarketcap might have to provide false information to the public!!! Comments? Hate to say it coinmarketcap but this is why I find myself checking targetmoonDOTcom more now a days. They post numbers in "order," no filters, no opinions just numbers. Just think of it from our point of view there is a lot of work to do on your site to see coins in true order. I find myself having to click back and fourth between page 1 and 2 writing down numbers just to see real ranking. Take this post comparing SiliconValleyCoin and solarcoin as a prime example. I mean it just looks silly when you have a coin posted in the low volume part that has a trading volume rank of 80 out of 208 coins. So you have a coin ranked 80 in 24hr volume and ranked 4 in market cap and where do we find it on your list? Number 138? I'm just saying your site is looking weird lately. Yes, it bugs me too. I'm trying to provide more views to accommodate everyone, hang tight. |
|
|
|
cryptojette
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
POP Across the Universe
|
|
April 03, 2014, 08:29:40 AM |
|
Yall Ready to POP Across the Universe?  I just submitted the full request to add Popular Coin POP! |
-^.^-
Crypto Jet
Popular Coin POP
|
|
|
|
EduCoin
|
|
April 03, 2014, 11:06:15 AM |
|
@Gliss, Thank you very much for adding EduCoin to Coinmarketcap.com! Thank you for your support and keep in touch!  Kind regards, EduCoin Dev Team
|
|
|
|
|
|
