|
palgin
|
 |
August 09, 2017, 07:58:50 PM |
|
exactly what i did, get this same error on a red line: unable to query number of CUDA devices
Hmmm, strange, I run 384.xx, everything's fine. Will look into this tomorrow. |
BTC tips welcome: 16DHzyuqenEoHRA3w3YVGcYSDSHks7mor4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
sparker327
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Parachute for sale. Used once. Small red stain.
|
|
August 09, 2017, 07:59:14 PM |
|
Thanks for your work, Palgin. Get this error: unable to query number of CUDA devices. Is nvidia driver installed? Tried both x86 and x64 builds on GTX 970
Previous version works fine.
same here with 1070 and lastest drivers I have GTX1070 and latest drivers and the update works for me.. just copy ccminer.exe and replace your old one with it. works fine exactly what i did, get this same error on a red line: unable to query number of CUDA devices ok, not sure then, sorry |
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:02:45 PM |
|
exactly what i did, get this same error on a red line: unable to query number of CUDA devices
Hmmm, strange, I run 384.xx, everything's fine. Will look into this tomorrow. What is actual hashrate for GTX1070 on stock clocks (or other NVIDIA cards) now? |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
|
michaelangelo
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:07:05 PM |
|
Gtx 1070 stock give me 18 mhs and
gtx 1060 3gb 12 i think, not sure 100%
rx570 4gb stock 16mhs
all values are from miner...
|
|
|
|
sparker327
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Parachute for sale. Used once. Small red stain.
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:09:06 PM |
|
exactly what i did, get this same error on a red line: unable to query number of CUDA devices
Hmmm, strange, I run 384.xx, everything's fine. Will look into this tomorrow. What is actual hashrate for GTX1070 on stock clocks (or other NVIDIA cards) now? trying it now on stock with core and mem at 0.. will let you know after a few minutes of running my 1070 |
|
|
|
|
|
vrap.pm
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:09:23 PM |
|
Hello,
How many transactions this algo can make in a second?
|
|
|
|
|
|
palgin
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:09:34 PM |
|
What is actual hashrate for GTX1070 on stock clocks (or other NVIDIA cards) now?
Don't have 1070's, so can't tell. 1080 (not Ti) got ~+2 MH, 1060 ~+1 MH. |
BTC tips welcome: 16DHzyuqenEoHRA3w3YVGcYSDSHks7mor4
|
|
|
junior.masters
Member
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 12
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:21:49 PM |
|
exactly what i did, get this same error on a red line: unable to query number of CUDA devices
Hmmm, strange, I run 384.xx, everything's fine. Will look into this tomorrow. sry man, my mistake, i was running with 382 driver, just updated to 384 and its working now was mining with previous version and getting 27.5MH/s each GTX1070 with +100 core OC, i will give some time to see rates now with this update.. ty very much for your work! |
|
|
|
|
clif_high
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:25:49 PM |
|
same results in my case
|
|
|
|
|
IaMnOtArObOt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:32:54 PM |
|
I'm getting around 25MH/s with a GTX1070 (mobile version  ) on stock settings. |
|
|
|
|
sparker327
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Parachute for sale. Used once. Small red stain.
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:35:40 PM |
|
exactly what i did, get this same error on a red line: unable to query number of CUDA devices
Hmmm, strange, I run 384.xx, everything's fine. Will look into this tomorrow. What is actual hashrate for GTX1070 on stock clocks (or other NVIDIA cards) now? MY unscientific test of Palgins new mod for ccminer. testing on an NVIDIA GeForce GTX1070 8GB, Driver 384.76, Win 10 64-bit. using MSI AFTERBURNER to set card to default. This is just to get a base for 1070 if you dont OC and leave all at default. POWER 100% VOLTAGE % 0 CORE 0 MEM 0 NO OC INTENSITY set to 21 on both tests NEW PALGIN MOD steady 24.73MH/s after 5 minutes, no OC, all defaults set on card. Temp at 77c OLD PALGIN MOD steady 25.10MH/s after 5 minutes, no OC, all defaults set on card. Temp at 77c Seems like for my 1070 there is a slight reduction with the new mod. You may have different results. I just did 5 minutes each with same parameters for each test run and stopped once the MH/s leveled off to a pretty constant number then backed off and started decreasing. I am not a testing professional. OC'ing I usually get 2-3 MH/s more, but I do a slight OC with lower power to keep temps under 70c. |
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
August 09, 2017, 08:57:09 PM |
|
exactly what i did, get this same error on a red line: unable to query number of CUDA devices
Hmmm, strange, I run 384.xx, everything's fine. Will look into this tomorrow. What is actual hashrate for GTX1070 on stock clocks (or other NVIDIA cards) now? MY unscientific test of Palgins new mod for ccminer. testing on an NVIDIA GeForce GTX1070 8GB, Driver 384.76, Win 10 64-bit. using MSI AFTERBURNER to set card to default. This is just to get a base for 1070 if you dont OC and leave all at default. POWER 100% VOLTAGE % 0 CORE 0 MEM 0 NO OC INTENSITY set to 21 on both tests NEW PALGIN MOD steady 24.73MH/s after 5 minutes, no OC, all defaults set on card. Temp at 77c OLD PALGIN MOD steady 25.10MH/s after 5 minutes, no OC, all defaults set on card. Temp at 77c Seems like for my 1070 there is a slight reduction with the new mod. You may have different results. I just did 5 minutes each with same parameters for each test run and stopped once the MH/s leveled off to a pretty constant number then backed off and started decreasing. I am not a testing professional. OC'ing I usually get 2-3 MH/s more, but I do a slight OC with lower power to keep temps under 70c. So my results for NVIDIA Cards are enough actual today: GTX1060 - 16Mh/s GTX1070 - 27Mh/s GTX1080 - 36Mh/s GTX1080Ti - 47Mh/s |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
|
Mikanoshi
|
|
August 09, 2017, 10:25:11 PM |
|
Yep , pretty cool page ,thanks for sharing!  Dark mode would be nice (darker colors) so I can use it on my screen all night  Done)  |
|
|
|
|
SunStruck
|
|
August 09, 2017, 10:56:09 PM |
|
Yep , pretty cool page ,thanks for sharing! Dark mode would be nice (darker colors) so I can use it on my screen all night Done) Sweet! Thanks man |
|
|
|
|
sketron1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 0
|
|
August 09, 2017, 10:57:51 PM |
|
Switched to ZEC for a day until I noticed SIGT was still more profitable for Nvidia cards. Yes, I'm a bag-holder at this point, but this is still my favorite coin to mine. Have all rigs pointed at SIGT now that difficulty has dropped. This coin will appreciate much greater than the more established coins, I'm pretty confident of that.
|
|
|
|
|
ItaCraft
Member
Offline
Activity: 138
Merit: 10
|
|
August 09, 2017, 11:08:12 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BellicoseBenny
|
|
August 09, 2017, 11:10:29 PM |
|
Switched to ZEC for a day until I noticed SIGT was still more profitable for Nvidia cards. Yes, I'm a bag-holder at this point, but this is still my favorite coin to mine. Have all rigs pointed at SIGT now that difficulty has dropped. This coin will appreciate much greater than the more established coins, I'm pretty confident of that.
I should have made a lot more *sobs* But I too am still mining it, at this price it's still the most profitable for my cards Although some one mentioned a coin I had never heard of before a bit earlier in the thread. Maybe taht one is better than SIGT But certainly nothing on what to mine |
|
|
|
|
|
Commie
|
|
August 09, 2017, 11:13:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam San
|
|
August 09, 2017, 11:15:26 PM |
|
exactly what i did, get this same error on a red line: unable to query number of CUDA devices
Hmmm, strange, I run 384.xx, everything's fine. Will look into this tomorrow. What is actual hashrate for GTX1070 on stock clocks (or other NVIDIA cards) now? MY unscientific test of Palgins new mod for ccminer. testing on an NVIDIA GeForce GTX1070 8GB, Driver 384.76, Win 10 64-bit. using MSI AFTERBURNER to set card to default. This is just to get a base for 1070 if you dont OC and leave all at default. POWER 100% VOLTAGE % 0 CORE 0 MEM 0 NO OC INTENSITY set to 21 on both tests NEW PALGIN MOD steady 24.73MH/s after 5 minutes, no OC, all defaults set on card. Temp at 77c OLD PALGIN MOD steady 25.10MH/s after 5 minutes, no OC, all defaults set on card. Temp at 77c Seems like for my 1070 there is a slight reduction with the new mod. You may have different results. I just did 5 minutes each with same parameters for each test run and stopped once the MH/s leveled off to a pretty constant number then backed off and started decreasing. I am not a testing professional. OC'ing I usually get 2-3 MH/s more, but I do a slight OC with lower power to keep temps under 70c. So my results for NVIDIA Cards are enough actual today: GTX1060 - 16Mh/s GTX1070 - 27Mh/s GTX1080 - 36Mh/s GTX1080Ti - 47Mh/s this is stock numbers or overclocking subject of shamanism. what producers received? |
|
|
|
Siralistair
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 12
|
|
August 09, 2017, 11:54:57 PM |
|
Thanks for that heads up! |
|
|
|
|
|
