Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
I guess oaths are meaningless now and in this case the last person to take this particular oath never really intended to actually read the document that he was supposed to "perserve, protect, and defend". I suppose he thought that as long as the National Archives building was covered with federal agents, that as long as nobody was physically stealing the actual document, that his oath was fulfilled.
I don't understand why people like Tom Flanagan aren't just ripped apart by those who supposedly claim to follow philosophies as outlined in the document that I'm quoting here. Similar principles supposedly also apply in most other countries of the world, but apparently it doesn't apply to Julian Assange or anybody working with Wikileaks. That "no law" may be made is a pretty bold statement. It can't be regulated or have legally defined limits.
A government directed assassination of the wikileaks director will be in even deeper shit than wikileak that it is not even funny.
I can only hope that those in this world are starting to wake up and just see how corrupt these government officials are that talk about doing all kinds of things to Wikileaks and trying to "make a law" that will stop a group like Wikileaks from being able to do what they are doing.
This whole thing just disgusts me altogether.
The best thing that the governments of this world could have and should have done is to ignore Wikileaks as an organization. If asked by the press, the response should have been "Who? Never heard of them." and left it at that. "Talked about in the news media? I don't watch those shows, sorry.