[ANN] KICKICO - PLATFORM FOR FUNDRAISING ON CRYPTOCURRENCY

[Odeoke]

Listing on BiteBTC
https://coindar.org/en/event/kickcoin-kick-listing-on-bitebtc-18201

https://twitter.com/KICKICOplatform/status/1103228872190033920
https://twitter.com/bitebtccom/status/1102903464135442433

Good news but from long time price is still in sideways and no bounce back happened. If it would listed on big exchange than we can keep hope for little recovery otherwise this kind of news won't work.

[1715645646]

1715645646

[1715645646]

1715645646

[1715645646]

1715645646

[1715645646]

1715645646

[CryptoTech_]

Good news but from long time price is still in sideways and no bounce back happened. If it would listed on big exchange than we can keep hope for little recovery otherwise this kind of news won't work.

News listings cannot be used as expectations for rising prices, because many tokens are listed in a market but do not bring good value to the price of these tokens

[Iyeman]

Good news but from long time price is still in sideways and no bounce back happened. If it would listed on big exchange than we can keep hope for little recovery otherwise this kind of news won't work.

News listings cannot be used as expectations for rising prices, because many tokens are listed in a market but do not bring good value to the price of these tokens

The latest pressure on the price of kickico caused by the airdrop that will end this year, that becomes the main factor why this coin gets plunged a lot to the bottom time to the time. I have been watching this one anytime.

[frcat]

Their platform was intended just for ICOs. And now they have not had any ICOs since last year (more than half of year already). So their platform is useless?

[2012]

Their platform was intended just for ICOs. And now they have not had any ICOs since last year (more than half of year already). So their platform is useless?

This is not good situation for ICOs mostly getting failed to achieve even their soft cap too and that's why there is no active crowdfunding on this platform. When we will see rally like 2017 than it will get big demand again and hopefully it will happen soon.

[voteformeg]

Their platform was intended just for ICOs. And now they have not had any ICOs since last year (more than half of year already). So their platform is useless?

i don't think that their platform is useless , but they just started at a very hard time for ico's and platform's

i have the feeling that in time this project will be better , specially when there are new rules added into crypto

[KnightRiderus]

Good news but from long time price is still in sideways and no bounce back happened. If it would listed on big exchange than we can keep hope for little recovery otherwise this kind of news won't work.

News listings cannot be used as expectations for rising prices, because many tokens are listed in a market but do not bring good value to the price of these tokens

im waiting for the price even lower and everything indicates this at the moment.
to be honest project cannot grow. binance launchpad completely intercepted the agenda and all its competitors at the bottom with owned by them platforms.

[frcat]

Their platform was intended just for ICOs. And now they have not had any ICOs since last year (more than half of year already). So their platform is useless?

i don't think that their platform is useless , but they just started at a very hard time for ico's and platform's

i have the feeling that in time this project will be better , specially when there are new rules added into crypto

Well. but some ICOs raising good money even in this hard time and even making good profit for investors. So this is just depend of platform. Seems they just abandoned platform....

[dampier007]

STO is another deception of investors. In fact, this is no different from the ICO. If STO were truly regulated, only accredited investors would be able to participate in it, and this would significantly reduce the number of investors.

Why accredited investors?
Why do we have to always think about the past?
The crypto market is new and we will be the most accredited investors in about ten years. STO are very different from ICO. we have treated the token up to now as if it were the actions of a company, but it is not so! STO gives you the right to participate in that company. We are treading the stock market but with the huge difference being in the crypto market. we do not need institutions, only adoption and progress.

You can dream about the future as much as you want, but now the situation is that STO in fact is no different from the ICO. If non - accredited investors can participate in STO, it means that it has no legal protection for these investors. This ICO, which was called differently to collect more money from this market

[readyUP]

You can dream about the future as much as you want, but now the situation is that STO in fact is no different from the ICO. If non - accredited investors can participate in STO, it means that it has no legal protection for these investors. This ICO, which was called differently to collect more money from this market

it's not dreaming about this !!!! STO is a security, which gives privileges to the investor that I own. if after the company does not actually maintain the credit, this is one more thing. why if it invests a retail investor should not have any protection and if it invests the accredited one must have it? these are all stupid things told in the last 100 years. tell me?! is a dollar more true than a BTC? why? because I print America that does not hold the gold reserve !! we must change the way we think and react, but the invention of satoshi is not signified.

with the STOs the company will be able to reward you by holding the token, if it does not it will probably fail in a short time. it is normal that we have to be careful of the badly organized companies. even companies listed on the stock exchange may fail from one moment to another. If bnk stopped paying dividends it would fail very soon. if a site to do shared staking stop paying the stake, I think that after a short time it would fail. the same for the new start-ups STO .. ​​if they stop paying the holder, they fail! What's wrong?! or do you want a government that tells you where and how to invest your money to be safer !? it does not hurt to be a little more responsible and grow in life. 

[dampier007]

You can dream about the future as much as you want, but now the situation is that STO in fact is no different from the ICO. If non - accredited investors can participate in STO, it means that it has no legal protection for these investors. This ICO, which was called differently to collect more money from this market

it's not dreaming about this !!!! STO is a security, which gives privileges to the investor that I own. if after the company does not actually maintain the credit, this is one more thing. why if it invests a retail investor should not have any protection and if it invests the accredited one must have it? these are all stupid things told in the last 100 years. tell me?! is a dollar more true than a BTC? why? because I print America that does not hold the gold reserve !! we must change the way we think and react, but the invention of satoshi is not signified.

with the STOs the company will be able to reward you by holding the token, if it does not it will probably fail in a short time. it is normal that we have to be careful of the badly organized companies. even companies listed on the stock exchange may fail from one moment to another. If bnk stopped paying dividends it would fail very soon. if a site to do shared staking stop paying the stake, I think that after a short time it would fail. the same for the new start-ups STO .. ​​if they stop paying the holder, they fail! What's wrong?! or do you want a government that tells you where and how to invest your money to be safer !? it does not hurt to be a little more responsible and grow in life. 

If the company gives any guarantees-someone has to control it. And in this case, the company can do anything. In the stock market, even if the company goes bankrupt - shareholders have the right to the company's property. And in this case, you do not have any rights even to the intellectual property of the company. Therefore, STO from ICO in this case is not much different.

[chichidori]

STO is another deception of investors. In fact, this is no different from the ICO. If STO were truly regulated, only accredited investors would be able to participate in it, and this would significantly reduce the number of investors.

Why accredited investors?
Why do we have to always think about the past?
The crypto market is new and we will be the most accredited investors in about ten years. STO are very different from ICO. we have treated the token up to now as if it were the actions of a company, but it is not so! STO gives you the right to participate in that company. We are treading the stock market but with the huge difference being in the crypto market. we do not need institutions, only adoption and progress.

You can dream about the future as much as you want, but now the situation is that STO in fact is no different from the ICO. If non - accredited investors can participate in STO, it means that it has no legal protection for these investors. This ICO, which was called differently to collect more money from this market

True STO and ICO have the same outcome it all depends on the platform and devs that are working on it, its all the same if it fails investors lose money what we need are new platform not just copy pasted one. KICK is getting listed on many small exchanges looking at the twitter feeds.

[readyUP]

True STO and ICO have the same outcome it all depends on the platform and devs that are working on it, its all the same if it fails investors lose money what we need are new platform not just copy pasted one. KICK is getting listed on many small exchanges looking at the twitter feeds.

I saw the second step for the recap, and this team is making a lot of progress. I do not understand why investors are making the price fall. this is an example of how many people do not know how to invest and do not follow the projects. I really hope they sell at a loss.

[drwoo]

STO is another deception of investors. In fact, this is no different from the ICO. If STO were truly regulated, only accredited investors would be able to participate in it, and this would significantly reduce the number of investors.

Why accredited investors?
Why do we have to always think about the past?
The crypto market is new and we will be the most accredited investors in about ten years. STO are very different from ICO. we have treated the token up to now as if it were the actions of a company, but it is not so! STO gives you the right to participate in that company. We are treading the stock market but with the huge difference being in the crypto market. we do not need institutions, only adoption and progress.

You can dream about the future as much as you want, but now the situation is that STO in fact is no different from the ICO. If non - accredited investors can participate in STO, it means that it has no legal protection for these investors. This ICO, which was called differently to collect more money from this market

STO will be different from ICO because they give the investors rights while the tokens from ICO give you nothing.

[dampier007]

True STO and ICO have the same outcome it all depends on the platform and devs that are working on it, its all the same if it fails investors lose money what we need are new platform not just copy pasted one. KICK is getting listed on many small exchanges looking at the twitter feeds.

I saw the second step for the recap, and this team is making a lot of progress. I do not understand why investors are making the price fall. this is an example of how many people do not know how to invest and do not follow the projects. I really hope they sell at a loss.

Because the ico market is now in decline. The price of the token can not grow if the platform does not have a lot of successful ico

[dampier007]

STO is another deception of investors. In fact, this is no different from the ICO. If STO were truly regulated, only accredited investors would be able to participate in it, and this would significantly reduce the number of investors.

Why accredited investors?
Why do we have to always think about the past?
The crypto market is new and we will be the most accredited investors in about ten years. STO are very different from ICO. we have treated the token up to now as if it were the actions of a company, but it is not so! STO gives you the right to participate in that company. We are treading the stock market but with the huge difference being in the crypto market. we do not need institutions, only adoption and progress.

You can dream about the future as much as you want, but now the situation is that STO in fact is no different from the ICO. If non - accredited investors can participate in STO, it means that it has no legal protection for these investors. This ICO, which was called differently to collect more money from this market

STO will be different from ICO because they give the investors rights while the tokens from ICO give you nothing.

This is not the right, but only the promises of the developers. But we are well aware that promises are worthless. If the regulatory authorities do not monitor the project - it can at any time change the conditions and promises will not be fulfilled. In addition, such projects may be interested in the SEC. And if he finds any problems-the price of the token can fall very much no matter how the development progresses

[readyUP]

Because the ico market is now in decline. The price of the token can not grow if the platform does not have a lot of successful ico

yes, but it is also the fault of investors who sell the token instead of holding !! if you see that the project is proceeding well, why do you sell your investment on market minimums? this shows that this market is completely inexperienced in investments.

[CORNEL]

Because the ico market is now in decline. The price of the token can not grow if the platform does not have a lot of successful ico

yes, but it is also the fault of investors who sell the token instead of holding !! if you see that the project is proceeding well, why do you sell your investment on market minimums? this shows that this market is completely inexperienced in investments.

Everyone is here to become rich in short time but nobody have patience and it is very easy to create panic situation in this market and let people to sell. That is the reason why people are crying like this.

[dampier007]

Because the ico market is now in decline. The price of the token can not grow if the platform does not have a lot of successful ico

yes, but it is also the fault of investors who sell the token instead of holding !! if you see that the project is proceeding well, why do you sell your investment on market minimums? this shows that this market is completely inexperienced in investments.

The investors follow the sentiment of the market. It is difficult to blame them that they sell their tokens when the price falls tenfold

[drwoo]

STO is another deception of investors. In fact, this is no different from the ICO. If STO were truly regulated, only accredited investors would be able to participate in it, and this would significantly reduce the number of investors.

Why accredited investors?
Why do we have to always think about the past?
The crypto market is new and we will be the most accredited investors in about ten years. STO are very different from ICO. we have treated the token up to now as if it were the actions of a company, but it is not so! STO gives you the right to participate in that company. We are treading the stock market but with the huge difference being in the crypto market. we do not need institutions, only adoption and progress.

You can dream about the future as much as you want, but now the situation is that STO in fact is no different from the ICO. If non - accredited investors can participate in STO, it means that it has no legal protection for these investors. This ICO, which was called differently to collect more money from this market

STO will be different from ICO because they give the investors rights while the tokens from ICO give you nothing.

This is not the right, but only the promises of the developers. But we are well aware that promises are worthless. If the regulatory authorities do not monitor the project - it can at any time change the conditions and promises will not be fulfilled. In addition, such projects may be interested in the SEC. And if he finds any problems-the price of the token can fall very much no matter how the development progresses

If it's a purely blockchain based business model the profits will go to the token holders, but if it's a normal business that promises to distribute profits you are right.