Make it 11, I'm just not mining right now cause I'm busy compiling(or trying to)
1. I vote that we wait and do some thinking first, then have a put-together update instead of something just thrown together quicklike. I don't want to yeah or nay anything without some reasoned discussion.
2. I'm not really for or against any of your proposed changes right now, except that it's going to cause a fork(it is, right?) and I don't want to see an update that only has a linux client and no windows client. I can compile a headless elacoind.exe at the moment but I'm having trouble getting it to compile with the QT frontend too.
3. again, I'm not for or against any of those changes really, but at the same time I don't really see any point in changing them except to fill some psychological need to see big numbers. the faster block time really isn't that big of a change but... is it necessary? is a 2.5 min block time that bad?
mat5x is working on it... so, just wait and let's have something that we can feel more sure about. join the #elacoin chat on freenode if you want(probably not anyone on right now...)
that's the thing, if the hasrate goes below a certain number, the chain will literary die out, i've tried keeping the convo going but it seems only mat5x is responding. yes it is a psychological thing, but it works..
if you will take the windows side, that would be great, i run all my machines on various versions of linux, i barely remember how to work windows.
things is, the community is 4 guys who are mining this on the pool, and by day's end, there may be noone there. Action is required fast and strong to bring the chain back to life and get miners working. As you know there are new altcoins everyday, and if this coin falls into that sesspool, it will never get out.