Bitcoin Forum
December 18, 2017, 09:48:58 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [Official] So what happened to Elacoin?  (Read 6870 times)
Milkshake
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


Milkshake


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:36:47 AM
 #161

Quote
static CBigNum bnProofOfWorkLimit(~uint256(0) >> 10000000); // Elacoin: starting difficulty

Wait... this doesn't make sense. There's only 256 bits. Shifting right by ten million bits would result in zero. So the value of the above is zero.

On the other hand I have no idea what that variable means so feel free to ignore me if I'm talking out of my ass.

Just doubling my chances of the OP seeing this in case it's a bug... sorry to repeat myself.
Well, the value of it is not zero as you can see by debug.log

TradeFortress has left me negative trust and has provided no proof to substantiate his claim. He has done this to discredit me as I am investigating him.
1513590538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513590538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513590538
Reply with quote  #2

1513590538
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513590538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513590538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513590538
Reply with quote  #2

1513590538
Report to moderator
1513590538
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513590538

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513590538
Reply with quote  #2

1513590538
Report to moderator
dentldir
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 324



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:39:15 AM
 #162

If it was not Hazard, then it was  dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope.  Wasn't me.  I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch.  I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source.  However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes.  Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.


1DentLdiRMv3dpmpmqWsQev8BUaty9vN3v
com911
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:39:35 AM
 #163

Such an alt-drama here.  Smiley

JohnDorien
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:40:37 AM
 #164

If it was not Hazard, then it was  dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope.  Wasn't me.  I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch.  I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source.  However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes.  Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.



well let's hope milkshake changed the sentence for genesis hash after the first source distibution
nerdcustoms
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:41:43 AM
 #165

well 3:40 AM here now.... should I sleep, take a dump, or get coffee?  or all of the above?

 *Image Removed*
Reputation Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=202142
coinerd
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:42:18 AM
 #166

If it was not Hazard, then it was  dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope.  Wasn't me.  I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch.  I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source.  However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes.  Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.



how many coinds has it generated in 5k blocks of 2 Mh?
r3animation
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:42:22 AM
 #167

If it was not Hazard, then it was  dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope.  Wasn't me.  I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch.  I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source.  However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes.  Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.



So you're releasing the windows binaries?
arjay45
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:42:53 AM
 #168

Quote
static CBigNum bnProofOfWorkLimit(~uint256(0) >> 10000000); // Elacoin: starting difficulty

Wait... this doesn't make sense. There's only 256 bits. Shifting right by ten million bits would result in zero. So the value of the above is zero.

On the other hand I have no idea what that variable means so feel free to ignore me if I'm talking out of my ass.

Just doubling my chances of the OP seeing this in case it's a bug... sorry to repeat myself.
Well, the value of it is not zero as you can see by debug.log

Well I guess in C++ you can override the >> operator so it doesn't mean "shift right N bits" any more. But if that is still what it means then I would think there's a bug. But I don't know the source code very well. I am way too sleepy to go source diving at this hour. I'm helping with the mining of the genesis block though just in case it will speed this process up.
nerdcustoms
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:44:26 AM
 #169

Not sure how the genesis block works, but is it something we can point the pool at and get it knocked out fast?  I don't mind throwing hashing power at it.

 *Image Removed*
Reputation Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=202142
Boxman90
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:46:08 AM
 #170

Yeah I'd much like to know how to help getting the genesis block. 3MH/s ready to go here. 6Mh/s if someone uploads a windows client, I can't build that.

LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC   BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
tytanick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


Simplemining.net Admin


View Profile WWW
May 14, 2013, 07:47:38 AM
 #171

is it normal that i get now (but elacoind is running for sure)
Code:
Every 2,0s: ./elacoind getinfo                          Tue May 14 09:47:42 2013

error: couldn't connect to server



and in debug:
Code:
nonce 000B1000: hash = 06356f8425dd36908d3e124b34ed1636a2214c6ac0a243aaf6926d1e727a5302 (target = 00000ffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
nonce 000B2000: hash = 564f23a9d3630274319a1b32095a0f4f87e45961e4017c3beb95961c03df927b (target = 00000ffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
nonce 000B3000: hash = 895a23ab37830e58062824e89eac245f003214cd6a850d5c45bed092152162fd (target = 00000ffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
nonce 000B4000: hash = 9ae87a856be3e232f4975bad08661ee26c6cda43008b8a39e572bd9725efffd7 (target = 00000ffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
nonce 000B5000: hash = 5f38ae94695dfe74865434142c5349b6bc9b5fc06bef02b1e2fa00b210a3c761 (target = 00000ffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
nonce 000B6000: hash = e4f3ed5edd43857fb196fd0f759aeb8d8880d2a075db5f8718026e6d6ec17ff6 (target = 00000ffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
nonce 000B7000: hash = fa50248a9d2d0e52920f914d643a97fdc9f70db644bb6a7332725919770116c1 (target = 00000ffff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)


I DONT REPLY to PRIVATE MESSAGES ON FORUM
Ask on forum or if you cant find answer then: admin@simplemining.net
Easy mining OS from Pendrive and SimpleRigResetter: simplemining.net
tytanick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


Simplemining.net Admin


View Profile WWW
May 14, 2013, 07:48:23 AM
 #172

Yeah I'd much like to know how to help getting the genesis block. 3MH/s ready to go here. 6Mh/s if someone uploads a windows client, I can't build that.
Also 5MH/s from me

I DONT REPLY to PRIVATE MESSAGES ON FORUM
Ask on forum or if you cant find answer then: admin@simplemining.net
Easy mining OS from Pendrive and SimpleRigResetter: simplemining.net
dentldir
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 324



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:49:30 AM
 #173

how many coinds has it generated in 5k blocks of 2 Mh?

I think it's one coin per block.

1DentLdiRMv3dpmpmqWsQev8BUaty9vN3v
JohnDorien
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:49:36 AM
 #174

Yeah I'd much like to know how to help getting the genesis block. 3MH/s ready to go here. 6Mh/s if someone uploads a windows client, I can't build that.
Also 5MH/s from me

here's the windows daemon: https://mega.co.nz/#!P0hxFLjI!NtvycGW2xAZPmoXrGywnDHRoBwUmH0igQzhNw0zhEvU

just let it run if it crashes --> good! genesis block @ debug.log
tytanick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


Simplemining.net Admin


View Profile WWW
May 14, 2013, 07:50:57 AM
 #175

Elacoin relaunched !!!!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=204823.0

I DONT REPLY to PRIVATE MESSAGES ON FORUM
Ask on forum or if you cant find answer then: admin@simplemining.net
Easy mining OS from Pendrive and SimpleRigResetter: simplemining.net
WindMaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347


View Profile
May 14, 2013, 07:52:35 AM
 #176

If it was not Hazard, then it was  dentldir. I haven't said his name because I believe he was innocent until now, but Hazard is still denying it and I think it may have being the other guy I gave the source to.

Nope.  Wasn't me.  I didn't even see that you sent me the final source until 5 minutes before it was supposed to launch.  I just now got it to compile after plowing through a rather verbose boost error that was actually the same pthread_t error I PMed you about on the public git source.  However, the Windows client crashes after running for about 5 minutes.  Not ready for launch.

That being said, the linux client gets connections and doesn't download blocks.

However, the Windows client reported almost 137MH/s on the first run when I did getmininginfo.

Currently:
{
"blocks" : 5287,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00167116,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 2012400,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Whoever is mining this thing is still going strong.

I've left the original leaked elacoind running and have been watching it and using it for mining testing.  The block count you're seeing above indicates it's the same block chain I'm watching.  When I first started it, blocks were ~600 or so, so it doesn't appear to be the same block chain Hazard reported.  I also have slightly short of 1/2 of the coins minted on that block chain at the moment.  Appears the mining hash rate info is being calculated incorrectly, I have about 6MH/sec pointed at it which has mint roughly half the coins, so there's probably about 12MH/sec still on that chain.

{
    "version" : 60300,
    "protocolversion" : 60001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 2264.00000000,
    "blocks" : 5486,
    "connections" : 3,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00167116,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1368517353,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}
barwizi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 08:00:29 AM
 #177

stuck at syncing 162 blocks
dentldir
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 324



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 08:07:22 AM
 #178

So you're releasing the windows binaries?

I shared my experience with Milkshake in building the Windows binary since I noticed he was stuck and I've been playing around with other alts recently.  The binary I have right now crashes hard when running as a server.  Probably because I built against the latest Bitcoin dependencies and not the ones in the original makefile.

Maybe I'm willing to help with a final release, but not inside all this drama.  I've already been called out because I tried to help and was sent source.  So far, not a great environment to jump into.

Either way, it shouldn't happen in a hurry.  It was ready for alpha today and testing by a limited experienced group.  Its clear the difficulty was too low as well.  

1DentLdiRMv3dpmpmqWsQev8BUaty9vN3v
dentldir
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 324



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 08:15:50 AM
 #179


I've left the original leaked elacoind running and have been watching it and using it for mining testing.  The block count you're seeing above indicates it's the same block chain I'm watching.  When I first started it, blocks were ~600 or so, so it doesn't appear to be the same block chain Hazard reported.  I also have slightly short of 1/2 of the coins minted on that block chain at the moment.  Appears the mining hash rate info is being calculated incorrectly, I have about 6MH/sec pointed at it which has mint roughly half the coins, so there's probably about 12MH/sec still on that chain.

{
    "version" : 60300,
    "protocolversion" : 60001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 2264.00000000,
    "blocks" : 5486,
    "connections" : 3,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00167116,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1368517353,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}


I guess the new chain is up now.  Orphan city with around 2MH/s with 31 connections.



1DentLdiRMv3dpmpmqWsQev8BUaty9vN3v
theking
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154



View Profile
May 14, 2013, 08:30:36 AM
 #180

need some more nodes

WIN: WQvqPASu4ffjfupfwkZCX2zECLAedBfSxT /// TheSmurfsCoin. TgKhTqtEe2NRQXKzUNL6TXs9NNSXTvxg26 /// [ANN] PixxCoin | PoS | Wallet with built in Exchange Dice Game And Fa | Free IPO. PLncxuyTOpsdASEAIweeoweKSJASJDNZETR /// CoolCoin - Free+IPO POS. CJG2g8CDkTrj5TMHHzi9ynkAvHamuUiKhC /// Get GiveawayCoin(GC)? (Free 100%NO IPO NO POW,PURE POS. G********* /// Let's flower the moon. Shjtq1XLnjgpbzSK3SvqMhQpK9CeAYLCPZ /// FootballCoin(FBC):FiaYuHEWhoS8v5dPbGLRDh7FBtcDV7TdnA /// Freebiescoin- 100% FREE Distribution FKDJUQ4Ybzdno2hoAP2NuYh1VAaTwMq1y2 /// ShareCoin Free and Fair Distribution. SR8eG4bhC2CzKnN2PfBz7vtj3zrcyXAuWr /// Energycoin - Save Energy, Pure POS (Free IPO). eCvsqEW2oFaSRq4XozfrHP8XuZ9kvrfQ5W /// Tagbond Rewards - My TAG ID is 5834 - Tag someone today with a reward, get your own TAG ID # (www.tagbond.com/5834)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!