da2ce7 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1222
Merit: 1016
Live and Let Live
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:01:00 PM |
|
MagicalTux,
As a bitcoin member that has dealt with you before, I want to say that over time you have built up my trust.
I want to offer you my support for to help make MtGox great again!
Please know that many of the older members of this community are here to support you and appreciate the tireless work that you put into the success of bitcoin.
Best of Luck, and Godspeed da2ce7
|
One off NP-Hard.
|
|
|
Herodes
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:03:46 PM |
|
I can only too agree with this. Too many people angry just for the sake of being angry. At this stage being angry helps nobody.
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:06:21 PM |
|
Finally, a rational, calm post. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
klaus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1004
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:06:26 PM |
|
+1
100% with you
|
bitmessage:BM-2D9c1oAbkVo96zDhTZ2jV6RXzQ9VG3A6f1 threema:HXUAMT96
|
|
|
foxmulder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:07:06 PM |
|
Yes let's not forget the time he bring out the first exchanger & pioneer who given out the possibility bitcoin reaching ~31$/btc, we should not bring out more drama,dilemma, trickery, greed to bitcoin community, our enemy is lots, together we will prevail!.
|
|
|
|
WesleyK
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:09:30 PM |
|
+1
|
|
|
|
foo
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:09:44 PM |
|
Yes let's not forget the time he bring out the first exchanger
No he didn't, he bought it from the guy who did.
|
I know this because Tyler knows this.
|
|
|
BCEmporium
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:11:57 PM |
|
Yes let's not forget the time he bring out the first exchanger
No he didn't, he bought it from the guy who did. Wrong, wrong, the first exchange was actually dwdollar's bitcoinmarket.
|
|
|
|
speeder
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:12:23 PM |
|
I want to help MtGox too
|
|
|
|
Oldminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:30:19 PM |
|
MtGox will still be going strong long after the cretins in this forum have all but forgotten about Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
wumpus
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:33:10 PM |
|
+1
I'm sure it will all be ok. Thanks for putting up with all the crap MT.
|
Bitcoin Core developer [PGP] Warning: For most, coin loss is a larger risk than coin theft. A disk can die any time. Regularly back up your wallet through File → Backup Wallet to an external storage or the (encrypted!) cloud. Use a separate offline wallet for storing larger amounts.
|
|
|
|
The_Duke
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Lead Core BitKitty Developer
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:34:44 PM |
|
MtGox will still be going strong long after the cretins in this forum have all but forgotten about Bitcoin.
MtGox will live strong for about 12 hours after it goes online again, since thats about the time we'll all need to transfer the money out of there.
|
NOT a member of the so called ''Bitcoin Foundation''. Choose Independence!
Donate to the BitKitty Foundation instead! -> 1Fd4yLneGmxRHnPi6WCMC2hAMzaWvDePF9 <-
|
|
|
relative
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:37:47 PM |
|
As a bitcoin member that has dealt with you before, I want to say that over time you have built up my trust.
to stop lying would be a good start to rebuild trust. there was no one single 500kBTC account with a weak password. that is so far out of the reasonable that it is safe to say he is lying until he provides proof.
|
|
|
|
speeder
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:40:47 PM |
|
As a bitcoin member that has dealt with you before, I want to say that over time you have built up my trust.
to stop lying would be a good start to rebuild trust. there was no one single 500kBTC account with a weak password. that is so far out of the reasonable that it is safe to say he is lying until he provides proof. To do that he would have to reveal the user. He cannot do that. But look around in the forums, in very old posts, you will eventually see that in the age that MtGox was founded, people did handled some thousand of BTCs around.
|
|
|
|
relative
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:43:33 PM |
|
But look around in the forums, in very old posts, you will eventually see that in the age that MtGox was founded, people did handled some thousand of BTCs around.
I never said noone has 500kBTC. I said noone has 500 kBTC at mtgox, let alone with a weak password. mtgox wasnt around at that time either, so it cant be an abondonded account from back then. that someone got write access to MtGox' database as some claim and just created the 500k out of nothing is much more likely.
|
|
|
|
Batouzo
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:44:15 PM |
|
MagicalTux, As a bitcoin member that has dealt with you before, I want to say that over time you have built up my trust.
Well I can say that services from mtgox where good as far as I know (but this leak clusterfuck is horrible shit). Obviously they need people that take take security as their life mission and are paranoid, not the "some hacks? well meh its probably the user fault" approach that was allegedly used.
|
|
|
|
chetrasho
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:45:05 PM |
|
I'm not mad at MtGox for getting hacked. They're a huge target and in some ways a hack was inevitable. They've handled the hack as well as possible with the shutdown, audit and rollback. However, I have a BIG PROBLEM with MtGox contacting the CIA or FBI or whoever. It's bad enough that I have to worry about whoever getting my information from the leaked database. Now I have to worry about the Feds looking through my account and coming for my bitcoins? Hell no... This isn't the first time that MtGx has considered running to the Feds: http://www.forexyard.com/en/news/Bitcoin-exchanges-offer-anti-money-laundering-aid-2011-06-15T220113ZIf you think that the Feds are friends of BTC or that their involvement is going to help the BTC community in any way, then you're sorely mistaken. MagicalTux, don't be a stupid snitch. Improve your security and learn your lesson, otherwise I'll be joining the tradehill exodus....
|
|
|
|
speeder
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:49:00 PM |
|
But look around in the forums, in very old posts, you will eventually see that in the age that MtGox was founded, people did handled some thousand of BTCs around.
I never said noone has 500kBTC. I said noone has 500 kBTC at mtgox, let alone with a weak password. mtgox wasnt around at that time either, so it cant be an abondonded account from back then. that someone got write access to MtGox' database as some claim and just created the 500k out of nothing is much more likely. MtGox is from July 2010 And many accounts of that era are abandoned and thus never got salted after MagicalTux bought MtGox and introduced salting. Thus if any of those accounts had absurd amounts of BTC (for our standards), something that is quite likely, they also happen to be the easiest accounts to break in using the leaked database. And never doubt people stupidity. I for example used the same password on mtgox and paypal, and it was a very crap password, and my paypal had access to several credit cards, this incident woke me up to reinforce those passwords, but if someone had broke in on my paypal that person probably would have some thousand USD of credit limit to destroy stuff around. (I have a high credit limit because I always pay credit cards in time, and I do that by never using them for more than the money I already have sitting on my bank account, thus this mean those cards also have lots of unused limit)
|
|
|
|
relative
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2011, 12:50:32 PM |
|
And many accounts of that era are abandoned and thus never got salted after MagicalTux bought MtGox and introduced salting. Thus if any of those accounts had absurd amounts of BTC (for our standards), something that is quite likely, they also happen to be the easiest accounts to break in using the leaked database.
MtGox claims it was ONE account. 500k is an absurd amount not only for our standards, but for early miners, too.
|
|
|
|
|