Gold Coin

[faraway]

Looks like I'm going to have to wait for a decent pool to be created.

Even with my 7 Mhash/s I'm getting no where.

I have only like 3MH dedicated to this and I am getting a few blocks  every so often... you get any blocks yet?

Once, e.g. cgminer is well configured with good options (like. --queue| 0), and using the p2pool, that work. I've tested the pool a moment before, letting it be available on line and I get the expected block rate.

[1713582743]

1713582743

[thekidcoin]

Just saw the difficulty increased a bit.  Still sub < 1 though.  Good thing at least is that the reward looks like it stays pretty high for a while.  Still getting a block here and there.

[Giskard]

The hash rate has reached 138 Mhs.

[sumantso]

The hash rate has reached 138 Mhs.

Will wait for a PPLNS pool then. Night all and thanks again for the donation.

[AZIZ1977]

EEfVE2mT7kUC57ELZpt48t8XR7j8bmTRxn

Waiting for my donation. Thanks.

[Mike270]

EEfVE2mT7kUC57ELZpt48t8XR7j8bmTRxn

Waiting for my donation. Thanks.

With that attitiude? Erm.... no, thanks....

[AZIZ1977]

EEfVE2mT7kUC57ELZpt48t8XR7j8bmTRxn

Waiting for my donation. Thanks.

With that attitiude? Erm.... no, thanks....

lol

[Mike270]

I've added a new p2pool.

Here are the parameters:

cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p .

statistics available here: http://next.afraid.org:8117

2% fee.

----
This one is up, tested, and fully reliable.

Here's how to optimize for the fast block times we're having:

cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p . --queue 0 --scan-time 1  <whatever gpu-tuning parameters you may have>

If you have already solomined you can add your solomining parameters as fallback:

cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p . <solo mining host/user/pass parameters> --queue 0 --scan-time 1  <whatever gpu-tuning parameters you may have>

If you want something else to mine as fallback:

cgminer --fallback-only --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p . <host/user/pass for fallback> --queue 0 --scan-time 1  <whatever gpu-tuning parameters you may have>

The --fallback-only is necessary if it's another coin than gldcoin, otherwise cgminer might assume it's different credentials for the same blockchain and tries to do some optimizations based on that

[Kyune]

I'm running the linux-qt, and I noticed that my default receive address starts with an E:

ECPGG1zAcZB6GH799ne8aU9yZReaTCLPxT

but when I generated a new receiving address it started with a D:

DzgQyN6n5R4VGC6oJxSfiumhJNsPZNYmqX

Is this expected behavior?

[Magic8Ball]

Any tips into my can please?

EG6i6ghsRs2g5hHQqpAonr2JgV9c7NVuQJ Thanks

[AZIZ1977]

I'm running the linux-qt, and I noticed that my default receive address starts with an E:

ECPGG1zAcZB6GH799ne8aU9yZReaTCLPxT

but when I generated a new receiving address it started with a D:

DzgQyN6n5R4VGC6oJxSfiumhJNsPZNYmqX

Is this expected behavior?

It is normal.

[Mike270]

I'm running the linux-qt, and I noticed that my default receive address starts with an E:

ECPGG1zAcZB6GH799ne8aU9yZReaTCLPxT

but when I generated a new receiving address it started with a D:

DzgQyN6n5R4VGC6oJxSfiumhJNsPZNYmqX

Is this expected behavior?

Sent 100 to first and 111 to second so you can see whether both are legit.

[Oldie]

I put one of my meager 250k machines at this, so not expecting much.  I haven't been a big fan of scrypt mining, tried Litecoin but never really got the hang of it.

Humming along though, and by the looks of it there was no pre-mine that doomed other alts.  This may work out.

I should change my profile to "AndNMe":

E2cvXbLUgkVKAndNMeH88pHJv4ybN9DAUW

lol

[Mike270]

I really like the way how all versions of p2pool seem to have trouble calculating the fees that go to operator correctly:

Expected after mining for 24 hours: 740 GLD per block.

So the miners have to pay 240 GLD according to their hash rates for each block they find? :-)

[AZIZ1977]

I've added a new p2pool.

Here are the parameters:

cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p .

statistics available here: http://next.afraid.org:8117

2% fee.

----
This one is up, tested, and fully reliable.

getting lot of rejects.

[Boxman90]

What is the diff retarget rate? How many blocks?

[Rannasha]

What is the diff retarget rate? How many blocks?

The value wasn't published afaik. I jumped in at around block 2000. Since then the difficulty has gone up 4 times (factor 4 each time, so 4^4 = 256) and we're now at block 10300. So I'd guess around 2000 blocks per retarget give or take a few hundred.

Check the source to be sure.

[faraway]

I really like the way how all versions of p2pool seem to have trouble calculating the fees that go to operator correctly:

Expected after mining for 24 hours: 740 GLD per block.

So the miners have to pay 240 GLD according to their hash rates for each block they find? :-)

This is a buggy displayed value, not the real payout, the p2pool code is not fixed yet.

[faraway]

What is the diff retarget rate? How many blocks?

The value wasn't published afaik. I jumped in at around block 2000. Since then the difficulty has gone up 4 times (factor 4 each time, so 4^4 = 256) and we're now at block 10300. So I'd guess around 2000 blocks per retarget give or take a few hundred.

Check the source to be sure.

{
    "blocks" : 10312,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.25000000,
    "errors" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "networkhashps" : 95941190,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : false
}

[Rannasha]

What is the diff retarget rate? How many blocks?

The value wasn't published afaik. I jumped in at around block 2000. Since then the difficulty has gone up 4 times (factor 4 each time, so 4^4 = 256) and we're now at block 10300. So I'd guess around 2000 blocks per retarget give or take a few hundred.

Check the source to be sure.

{
    "blocks" : 10312,
    "currentblocksize" : 1000,
    "currentblocktx" : 0,
    "difficulty" : 0.25000000,
    "errors" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "networkhashps" : 95941190,
    "pooledtx" : 0,
    "testnet" : false
}

Doesn't say what the retarget-rate is.

Also, almost 100 MHash/s on the network, pretty cool.