faraway
|
|
May 15, 2013, 08:43:44 PM |
|
Looks like I'm going to have to wait for a decent pool to be created.
Even with my 7 Mhash/s I'm getting no where.
I have only like 3MH dedicated to this and I am getting a few blocks every so often... you get any blocks yet? Once, e.g. cgminer is well configured with good options (like. --queue| 0), and using the p2pool, that work. I've tested the pool a moment before, letting it be available on line and I get the expected block rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
thekidcoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
FlutterCoin Developer
|
|
May 15, 2013, 08:46:46 PM |
|
Just saw the difficulty increased a bit. Still sub < 1 though. Good thing at least is that the reward looks like it stays pretty high for a while. Still getting a block here and there.
|
1MYL967PR52xiNtqSP9WphRvPzKZDjBdxn
|
|
|
Giskard
|
|
May 15, 2013, 08:47:37 PM |
|
The hash rate has reached 138 Mhs.
|
|
|
|
sumantso
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2013, 08:51:40 PM |
|
The hash rate has reached 138 Mhs.
Will wait for a PPLNS pool then. Night all and thanks again for the donation.
|
|
|
|
AZIZ1977
|
|
May 15, 2013, 08:55:28 PM |
|
EEfVE2mT7kUC57ELZpt48t8XR7j8bmTRxn
Waiting for my donation. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Mike270
|
|
May 15, 2013, 08:57:18 PM |
|
EEfVE2mT7kUC57ELZpt48t8XR7j8bmTRxn
Waiting for my donation. Thanks.
With that attitiude? Erm.... no, thanks....
|
|
|
|
AZIZ1977
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:02:24 PM |
|
EEfVE2mT7kUC57ELZpt48t8XR7j8bmTRxn
Waiting for my donation. Thanks.
With that attitiude? Erm.... no, thanks.... lol
|
|
|
|
Mike270
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:04:37 PM |
|
I've added a new p2pool. Here are the parameters: cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p . statistics available here: http://next.afraid.org:81172% fee. ---- This one is up, tested, and fully reliable. Here's how to optimize for the fast block times we're having: cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p . --queue 0 --scan-time 1 <whatever gpu-tuning parameters you may have> If you have already solomined you can add your solomining parameters as fallback: cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p . <solo mining host/user/pass parameters> --queue 0 --scan-time 1 <whatever gpu-tuning parameters you may have> If you want something else to mine as fallback: cgminer --fallback-only --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p . <host/user/pass for fallback> --queue 0 --scan-time 1 <whatever gpu-tuning parameters you may have> The --fallback-only is necessary if it's another coin than gldcoin, otherwise cgminer might assume it's different credentials for the same blockchain and tries to do some optimizations based on that
|
|
|
|
Kyune
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:06:45 PM |
|
I'm running the linux-qt, and I noticed that my default receive address starts with an E:
ECPGG1zAcZB6GH799ne8aU9yZReaTCLPxT
but when I generated a new receiving address it started with a D:
DzgQyN6n5R4VGC6oJxSfiumhJNsPZNYmqX
Is this expected behavior?
|
BTC: 1K4VpdQXQhgmTmq68rbWhybvoRcyNHKyVP
|
|
|
Magic8Ball
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:07:27 PM |
|
Any tips into my can please?
EG6i6ghsRs2g5hHQqpAonr2JgV9c7NVuQJ Thanks
|
|
|
|
AZIZ1977
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:12:47 PM |
|
I'm running the linux-qt, and I noticed that my default receive address starts with an E:
ECPGG1zAcZB6GH799ne8aU9yZReaTCLPxT
but when I generated a new receiving address it started with a D:
DzgQyN6n5R4VGC6oJxSfiumhJNsPZNYmqX
Is this expected behavior?
It is normal.
|
|
|
|
Mike270
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:13:24 PM |
|
I'm running the linux-qt, and I noticed that my default receive address starts with an E:
ECPGG1zAcZB6GH799ne8aU9yZReaTCLPxT
but when I generated a new receiving address it started with a D:
DzgQyN6n5R4VGC6oJxSfiumhJNsPZNYmqX
Is this expected behavior?
Sent 100 to first and 111 to second so you can see whether both are legit.
|
|
|
|
Oldie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:15:26 PM |
|
I put one of my meager 250k machines at this, so not expecting much. I haven't been a big fan of scrypt mining, tried Litecoin but never really got the hang of it.
Humming along though, and by the looks of it there was no pre-mine that doomed other alts. This may work out.
I should change my profile to "AndNMe":
E2cvXbLUgkVKAndNMeH88pHJv4ybN9DAUW
lol
|
|
|
|
Mike270
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:16:05 PM |
|
I really like the way how all versions of p2pool seem to have trouble calculating the fees that go to operator correctly:
Expected after mining for 24 hours: 740 GLD per block.
So the miners have to pay 240 GLD according to their hash rates for each block they find? :-)
|
|
|
|
AZIZ1977
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:16:22 PM |
|
I've added a new p2pool. Here are the parameters: cgminer --scrypt -o next.afraid.org:8117 -u yourGLDaddress -p . statistics available here: http://next.afraid.org:81172% fee. ---- This one is up, tested, and fully reliable. getting lot of rejects.
|
|
|
|
Boxman90
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:16:59 PM |
|
What is the diff retarget rate? How many blocks?
|
LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
|
|
|
Rannasha
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:19:21 PM |
|
What is the diff retarget rate? How many blocks?
The value wasn't published afaik. I jumped in at around block 2000. Since then the difficulty has gone up 4 times (factor 4 each time, so 4^4 = 256) and we're now at block 10300. So I'd guess around 2000 blocks per retarget give or take a few hundred. Check the source to be sure.
|
|
|
|
faraway
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:20:51 PM |
|
I really like the way how all versions of p2pool seem to have trouble calculating the fees that go to operator correctly:
Expected after mining for 24 hours: 740 GLD per block.
So the miners have to pay 240 GLD according to their hash rates for each block they find? :-)
This is a buggy displayed value, not the real payout, the p2pool code is not fixed yet.
|
|
|
|
faraway
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:21:48 PM |
|
What is the diff retarget rate? How many blocks?
The value wasn't published afaik. I jumped in at around block 2000. Since then the difficulty has gone up 4 times (factor 4 each time, so 4^4 = 256) and we're now at block 10300. So I'd guess around 2000 blocks per retarget give or take a few hundred. Check the source to be sure. { "blocks" : 10312, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 0.25000000, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 95941190, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false }
|
|
|
|
Rannasha
|
|
May 15, 2013, 09:23:31 PM |
|
What is the diff retarget rate? How many blocks?
The value wasn't published afaik. I jumped in at around block 2000. Since then the difficulty has gone up 4 times (factor 4 each time, so 4^4 = 256) and we're now at block 10300. So I'd guess around 2000 blocks per retarget give or take a few hundred. Check the source to be sure. { "blocks" : 10312, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 0.25000000, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 95941190, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } Doesn't say what the retarget-rate is. Also, almost 100 MHash/s on the network, pretty cool.
|
|
|
|
|