BITMIXER.CO - Bitcoin Mixer & Tumbler - Anonymous Bitcoin Mixer

[Cluster2k]

I'm happy to announce the new Bitcoin Mixer and Tumbler www.bitmixer.co

No logs, no accounts, no tracking.
Feel free to leave your feedback here.

[1715644404]

1715644404

[1715644404]

1715644404

[1715644404]

1715644404

[1715644404]

1715644404

[1715644404]

1715644404

[mikandri]

I'm happy to announce the new Bitcoin Mixer and Tumbler bitcoinmixer.co

No logs, no accounts, no tracking.
Feel free to leave your feedback here.

Website not working for me

[onnz423]

Nice job However problems with DNS of your site.
Do you offer same kind of chipping of the funds as chipmixer does?
And also, what are your fees and are you planning to make a site on i2p or tor as well?
The main reason people want to mix, is to minimize their digital footprint and if you host the mixer on clearnet, it will not attract as many customers probably.

[Need Escrow Today]

This site can’t be reached

bitcoinmixer.co’s server DNS address could not be found.

Is anything different from ex(Bitmixer) and from Chipmixer, please mention the difference, improvement.

[Cluster2k]

Sorry for the little typo in the OP, now website link works fine.

[onnz423]

Sorry for the little typo in the OP, now website link works fine.

Uhm, nope. I don't have too high hopes for as technical site as this, if the launch fails easily like this :/
The site should have at least been tested before announcing it anywhere.

Edit: Starting post still says bitcoinmixer.co instead of bitmixer.co

[Need Escrow Today]

Sorry for the little typo in the OP, now website link works fine.

Update the main post, the link is still the old one, update it to: BITMIXER.CO

[Cluster2k]

Nice job However problems with DNX of your site.
Do you offer same kind of chipping of the funds as chipmixer does?
And also, what are your fees and are you planning to make a site on i2p or tor as well?
The main reason people want to mix, is to minimize their digital footprint and if you host the mixer on clearnet, it will not attract as many customers probably.

Thanks for the encouraging words.

Bitmixer.co offers:

- wide funds pool from clean transactions, regularly updated every day.

- completely offline and automated procedure. Coins are always safe during the entire mixing process.

- nothing is stored on the webserver, neither your personal infos which are sent through an encrypted connection to a secure webmail.

- we do not use cookies, no javascript plugins or any other injectable code, making Bitmixer.co ideal for i2p and tor websites.

TOR and I2P websites mirror will come soon.

Fees are 0.25% and 0.0005 BTC for each different output address other than the 1st.

[Cluster2k]

Sorry for the little typo in the OP, now website link works fine.

Uhm, nope. I don't have too high hopes for as technical site as this, if the launch fails easily like this :/
The site should have at least been tested before announcing it anywhere.

Edit: Starting post still says bitcoinmixer.co instead of bitmixer.co

I edited the OP with the correct links. We can take the drama off now.

[Cluster2k]

You are encouraged to try the service with smaller amount (over 0.01 BTC) and test it.

[mobnepal]

You should ask for signed message from the sending address because everybody can check the given deposit address (I assume it will remain same for whole day for everyone) and than claim the sending address is his/her.

[Cluster2k]

You should ask for signed message from the sending address because everybody can check the given deposit address (I assume it will remain same for whole day for everyone) and than claim the sending address is his/her.

Users can first complete the form, send it, and then mix BTCs.

No need to use a signed message and compromise even more your anonimity.

[bL4nkcode]

Good job will you implement like the letter of guarantee which the past bitmixer.io and [banned mixer] does? And I bet you should make its ANN thread on service announcement. And BTW are you going have signature campaign for this like what mixers do here.

[MrCrank]

Wow, it's like my favorite bitmixer.io.
This useful service for many users.
Do you plan run signature campaign?

[Arcteryx]

Would like to know the same thing.

Is this the same site just a new owner?

[exstasie]

Nice job However problems with DNX of your site.
Do you offer same kind of chipping of the funds as chipmixer does?
And also, what are your fees and are you planning to make a site on i2p or tor as well?
The main reason people want to mix, is to minimize their digital footprint and if you host the mixer on clearnet, it will not attract as many customers probably.

Thanks for the encouraging words.

Bitmixer.co offers:

- wide funds pool from clean transactions, regularly updated every day.

- completely offline and automated procedure. Coins are always safe during the entire mixing process.

- nothing is stored on the webserver, neither your personal infos which are sent through an encrypted connection to a secure webmail.

- we do not use cookies, no javascript plugins or any other injectable code, making Bitmixer.co ideal for i2p and tor websites.

TOR and I2P websites mirror will come soon.

Fees are 0.25% and 0.0005 BTC for each different output address other than the 1st.

Awesome. As expected, new services are springing up to replace Bitmixer. I'm really glad to see that, and would like to support your service. I suggest starting a thread in the Service Announcements subforum and continually updating users regarding features and service issues to get some more exposure.

I'll give your service a try when I get home later and have access to my local wallet. Good luck!

[OmegaStarScream]

If the address used for mixing is the same, how anonymous the process is going to be? I tried to access the site from different devices and what you call 'ACTIVE MIXING ADDRESS' doesn't seem to be changing, instead, It changes every 24 hours but a lot of people will be using it, shouldn't you consider generating unique addresses?

[matthona]

I'm happy to announce the new Bitcoin Mixer and Tumbler www.bitmixer.co

No logs, no accounts, no tracking.
Feel free to leave your feedback here.

Are you planning to start signature campaign again?

[DarkStar_]

Why self-moderate your ANN thread? It's a huge red flag as you probably know, as you can easily censor bad comments.

Also, why have 1 public mixing address that only changes daily? Seems somewhat like a security risk, since I can easily write a script that scrapes the address every day, logs it, and then if I think someone used your mixer, I could see if they sent a tx to one of those addresses, and know instantly that they sent their coins to Bitmixer.co. I wouldn't know the output, but it would bring me closer.

Service seems quite shady.

[freebutcaged]

As a member of this forum when I see a self moderated thread for a service questions appear in my mind even knowing the main reason for

A self moderated thread created by the OP is basically to avoid spam and trolling. but you know better, I think after Bitmixer running away

To avoid getting arrested by the international law enforcements it was only the matter of time for someone quickly take their place, lets see

How the community welcomes this new Bitmixer.

[pearlmen]

I would advise there is a change in the name because it might cause confusion that bitmixer is back in which is not in this case. Also, this should be moved to service discussion section of the forum and its about service provision. A self moderated for a service like this in my own opinion is not the right way to go.

[pixie85]

As a member of this forum when I see a self moderated thread for a service questions appear in my mind even knowing the main reason for

A self moderated thread created by the OP is basically to avoid spam and trolling. but you know better, I think after Bitmixer running away

To avoid getting arrested by the international law enforcements it was only the matter of time for someone quickly take their place, lets see

How the community welcomes this new Bitmixer.

Usually a self moderated thread is made to stop negative comments and trolling, which unfortunately implies the OP is expecting it.
We just had one bitmixer go down and another one is trying to ride the wave. It's not going to be easy to gain trust and find customers

[Loepuenkyou]

why domain use bitmixer, same with old bitcoin mixer service , bitmixer.io
or this thread same company with bitmixer.io, only use new domain

[TryNinja]

I don't think a mixer using a single address for every costumer and asking people to send a message with the tx id is going to work well. There is no way to prove that you are indeed the person who sent X bitcoins to the mixer address, and it's way too much work (and manual).

And as others pointed out, a self-moderated thread is not the best way to show up without any legacy of being trustable. Of course it's not a sign of scam, but it's not one of the best signs either.

why domain use bitmixer, same with old bitcoin mixer service , bitmixer.io
or this thread same company with bitmixer.io, only use new domain

It's not. It's a new service with a different team

[freebutcaged]

I don't think a mixer using a single address for every costumer and asking people to send a message with the tx id is going to work well. There is no way to prove that you are indeed the person who sent X bitcoins to the mixer address, and it's way too much work (and manual).

And as others pointed out, a self-moderated thread is not the best way to show up without any legacy of being trustable. Of course it's not a sign of scam, but it's not one of the best signs either.

why domain use bitmixer, same with old bitcoin mixer service , bitmixer.io
or this thread same company with bitmixer.io, only use new domain

It's not. It's a new service with a different team

I agree with your argument about the address and the process of mixing, that could and must be fixed, but a legendary member worth more

Than 0.01 or 0.02BTC don't you think? because if I ever want to use this mixer, I'd only send the minimum amounts at least for a month or two

Before trusting with 0.5+BTC in each transaction, however due to existence of other mixers such as chip and blender among other services the

Only thing standing on the OP's way to successfully replace and claim the number one rank of Bitmixer is the lack of advertisement. if you ask

Bitmixer.io's admin, I'm sure he'll tell you that he was sharing a huge percentage of his income with signature participants at least for the first

2 years and only his earnings started to grow exponentially in the last year of his running business which was 2016 and the first 4 months of 2017.

[Argwai96]

I wish you good luck, at this moment I'm also working on a new mixing service.

few advices:

you can't open a system which is still in beta. you're doing those mixing by yourself and it is not automated like it should be.

could storage --> hot storage ---> client address .

I also see you're using javascript which is the number one rule of not to.

You did not make TOR connection which the basic of mixing. USING TOR.

wish you good luck.

[Cluster2k]

First of all thanks to everyone for the feedback and suggestions.

I understand that a moderated thread sounds not-so-good for this kind of services but I'm not going to abuse of this feature in any way, negative comments and critics will be tolerated unless they become offensive, that's why I choose to use a moderated one. In my long experience here I've seen that trolling could go at its finest here,so better to prevent instead of fixing.

About the mixing process, this is just a beta because Crypto community lost Bitmixer.io few days ago, a service very useful for everyone, and I felt that something like this was needed.
I'm not the owner of the closed Bitmixer and I believe that privacy is a matter of human rights, so this is the reason why I started a mixing service.

I will update the software daily to improve the backend techniques and gain the trust of the community.

Hear soon.

[Cluster2k]

Bitmixer.io is currently under backend maintenance while I perform some upgrades and fix.

Hear soon.

[In the silence]

Oh a new bitcoin mixer, goodluck with your service. I think your thread should be here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=84.0 and improve the announcement.

[pikebu]

I'm happy to announce the new Bitcoin Mixer and Tumbler www.bitmixer.co

No logs, no accounts, no tracking.
Feel free to leave your feedback here.

The website is good could be accessed by smartphone and i like it, do you have plan to decrease the minimum of bitcoins to mix on your service? The minimum of bitcoins accepted on the service is 0.01 bitcoins, it is too much for the users who want try your service, i think you must decrease the minimum of transaction to 0.001 bitcoins, it will be more good to test mix the bitcoins on your service. Thank you

[twinstarrider72]

When is it back online again?

[btcton]

The fact that this BitMixer has the same name as the old one is cause for concern, in my opinion. It could be used to deceive people into thinking it is the same service as the old and trusted BitMixer that closed down recently. Those who are not aware of the fact that it closed could think this is the same service and even those who do know might believe that the site simply reopened for some reason. While I have no real use of a mixer myself other than to vouch for them, I would sit and wait for a bit before using this to make sure that it is legit and that trusted members of the community vouch for its legitimacy. The mixer itself seems to be backed by a Legendary member already, so that's a good start to begin with.

[tsaroz]

It certainly came to fulfill the void created by bitmixer.
Naming it similar to bitmixer is a simple strategy.
Hope this too gets similar success as bitmixer got.

[ChipMixer]

Trust cannot be created by naming your service the same as competition.
Naming your new service the same as old and reputable service is done to trick potential users to trust you.

[Argwai96]

Trust cannot be created by naming your service the same as competition.
Naming your new service the same as old and reputable service is done to trick potential users to trust you.

I agree! I would love giving new players their chances, but it must be gained from zero and not based on previous companies.

[freebutcaged]

Trust cannot be created by naming your service the same as competition.
Naming your new service the same as old and reputable service is done to trick potential users to trust you.

Trick is Chipmixer.io or .net mate, there is no competition, the previous Bitmixer is no longer in business, so it's not considered fooling trick.

Anyone having enough Bitcoins and in need of mixing them is smart and knows the difference. if this service becomes a reliable and trusted

One, I see no reason why it shouldn't beat you(Chipmixer) in competition. only thing they need is more advertisements than you plus completing

Their platform. in my country an application which is for taxi calling spent $1M just to advertise their app even before earning $10,000.

Advertisement is the first and most important part of any business. if this mixer advertises much like you then your job will become harder to compete.

[Gleb Gamow]

Sorry for the little typo in the OP, now website link works fine.

Uhm, nope. I don't have too high hopes for as technical site as this, if the launch fails easily like this :/
The site should have at least been tested before announcing it anywhere.

Edit: Starting post still says bitcoinmixer.co instead of bitmixer.co

FWIW, at least the domain has its servers in the country of California where the feds won't be able to take it down: http://domainbigdata.com/192.64.119.120

[onnz423]

FWIW, at least the domain has its servers in the country of California where the feds won't be able to take it down: http://domainbigdata.com/192.64.119.120

Im not that familiar with US laws, but could this potentially be considered laundering at most states? However i do not think that USA is best place to host such service at, hidden service would have been way better option IMO.
Hosting the servers on one of the nordic countries would have probably been alot better to the site. For example when piratebay was hosting  the servers still at sweden, they were protected by the laws. I hope OP is not a US citizen because if service as this is not protected by law, the justice system at states i consider inhuman for some certain crimes.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Bitmixer.io is currently under backend maintenance while I perform some upgrades and fix.

Hear soon.

Is this a typo  And for the record the bitmixer website name has had several copy cats during its time how will you ensure users do not get scammed by phishing sites posing to be the real BITMIXER.CO
All the best OP in the tumbling business  we need this competition

[shield132]

Oh guys, whatever will happem, no one can believe me that your mixer is really mixer and not a shit scam. Cmon man, you create website with very known name: Bitmixer. And you do this after they closed. Changing .io to .co don't means you are like new company.
Don't want to be rude but I think this thread must be closed and removed. Site which claims to be safe mixer and uses another mixer's name, isn't something to trust.

[btcton]

Oh guys, whatever will happem, no one can believe me that your mixer is really mixer and not a shit scam. Cmon man, you create website with very known name: Bitmixer. And you do this after they closed. Changing .io to .co don't means you are like new company.
Don't want to be rude but I think this thread must be closed and removed. Site which claims to be safe mixer and uses another mixer's name, isn't something to trust.

Not necessarily. I do agree that it is a shady business practice as I explained in my previous post in this thread, but it could also purely have been named the same for the business part of it-- that is garnering all the previous BitMixer uses. What I am warning about is mostly that this should be considered a completely new unrelated service and that previous customers should not get confused. Sure, the liability might not fall directly on BitMixer.co's lap, but they do know what they are doing and whether they want to clear it up on their website or not is strictly under their control. That is really the only part of concern. Their legitimacy as a mixer is still to be tested, but so far it is not tainted since no scam accusations have appeared. Once some feedback comes in, the situation might change. It is too early to call it a scam.

[ChipMixer]

Trust cannot be created by naming your service the same as competition.
Naming your new service the same as old and reputable service is done to trick potential users to trust you.

Trick is Chipmixer.io or .net mate, there is no competition, the previous Bitmixer is no longer in business, so it's not considered fooling trick.

Old Satoshi is no longer is business, so it does not fool anyone to impersonate him?

[shield132]

Oh guys, whatever will happem, no one can believe me that your mixer is really mixer and not a shit scam. Cmon man, you create website with very known name: Bitmixer. And you do this after they closed. Changing .io to .co don't means you are like new company.
Don't want to be rude but I think this thread must be closed and removed. Site which claims to be safe mixer and uses another mixer's name, isn't something to trust.

Not necessarily. I do agree that it is a shady business practice as I explained in my previous post in this thread, but it could also purely have been named the same for the business part of it-- that is garnering all the previous BitMixer uses. What I am warning about is mostly that this should be considered a completely new unrelated service and that previous customers should not get confused. Sure, the liability might not fall directly on BitMixer.co's lap, but they do know what they are doing and whether they want to clear it up on their website or not is strictly under their control. That is really the only part of concern. Their legitimacy as a mixer is still to be tested, but so far it is not tainted since no scam accusations have appeared. Once some feedback comes in, the situation might change. It is too early to call it a scam.

Imagine google decided to stop their search engine website and after some days someone comes and says: google.io is new and trustful search engine service.
Is this logical? We don't have to see scam accusations for proofs, it's worst situation because someone loses huge amount and everything becomes clear after that.
That's all I wanted to say.

[btcton]

Oh guys, whatever will happem, no one can believe me that your mixer is really mixer and not a shit scam. Cmon man, you create website with very known name: Bitmixer. And you do this after they closed. Changing .io to .co don't means you are like new company.
Don't want to be rude but I think this thread must be closed and removed. Site which claims to be safe mixer and uses another mixer's name, isn't something to trust.

Not necessarily. I do agree that it is a shady business practice as I explained in my previous post in this thread, but it could also purely have been named the same for the business part of it-- that is garnering all the previous BitMixer uses. What I am warning about is mostly that this should be considered a completely new unrelated service and that previous customers should not get confused. Sure, the liability might not fall directly on BitMixer.co's lap, but they do know what they are doing and whether they want to clear it up on their website or not is strictly under their control. That is really the only part of concern. Their legitimacy as a mixer is still to be tested, but so far it is not tainted since no scam accusations have appeared. Once some feedback comes in, the situation might change. It is too early to call it a scam.

Imagine google decided to stop their search engine website and after some days someone comes and says: google.io is new and trustful search engine service.
Is this logical? We don't have to see scam accusations for proofs, it's worst situation because someone loses huge amount and everything becomes clear after that.
That's all I wanted to say.

Yeah, and I agree with you for the most part. As I mentioned, this is mostly a deceiving technique used to obtain the previous customers of BitMixer.io. Where I disagree with you is that it is hands down a scam. It may not be one, as fishy as it could sound. That could just be their business plan for obtaining customers. And of course, anyone putting any significant amount of bitcoins into this mixer definitely sounds like a terrible idea, but I doubt anyone with a significant amount of money would use this mixer instead of a reputable and trusted one like ChipMixer. We can still just wait and see what happens. It is still not a good enough reason to close the thread. Even confirmed scam services do not have their threads closed.

[Cluster2k]

Bitmixer.co was first an investment in domain names. Then i came up with the closure of bitmixer.io and I thought to start this service.

Unfortunately I have bigger fish to catch for business so i stopped the website and will keep back on with a new backend script to manage the mixing when i'll have time.

I'm in no need to scam anyone and I was just trying to offer a service with a recognisable brand like name. I'm not stealing anything to anyone.
If bitmixer.io would still be active I would have never started the project.