BITMIXER.CO - Bitcoin Mixer & Tumbler - Anonymous Bitcoin Mixer

[pearlmen]

I would advise there is a change in the name because it might cause confusion that bitmixer is back in which is not in this case. Also, this should be moved to service discussion section of the forum and its about service provision. A self moderated for a service like this in my own opinion is not the right way to go.

[pixie85]

As a member of this forum when I see a self moderated thread for a service questions appear in my mind even knowing the main reason for

A self moderated thread created by the OP is basically to avoid spam and trolling. but you know better, I think after Bitmixer running away

To avoid getting arrested by the international law enforcements it was only the matter of time for someone quickly take their place, lets see

How the community welcomes this new Bitmixer.

Usually a self moderated thread is made to stop negative comments and trolling, which unfortunately implies the OP is expecting it.
We just had one bitmixer go down and another one is trying to ride the wave. It's not going to be easy to gain trust and find customers

[Loepuenkyou]

why domain use bitmixer, same with old bitcoin mixer service , bitmixer.io
or this thread same company with bitmixer.io, only use new domain

[TryNinja]

I don't think a mixer using a single address for every costumer and asking people to send a message with the tx id is going to work well. There is no way to prove that you are indeed the person who sent X bitcoins to the mixer address, and it's way too much work (and manual).

And as others pointed out, a self-moderated thread is not the best way to show up without any legacy of being trustable. Of course it's not a sign of scam, but it's not one of the best signs either.

why domain use bitmixer, same with old bitcoin mixer service , bitmixer.io
or this thread same company with bitmixer.io, only use new domain

It's not. It's a new service with a different team

[freebutcaged]

I don't think a mixer using a single address for every costumer and asking people to send a message with the tx id is going to work well. There is no way to prove that you are indeed the person who sent X bitcoins to the mixer address, and it's way too much work (and manual).

And as others pointed out, a self-moderated thread is not the best way to show up without any legacy of being trustable. Of course it's not a sign of scam, but it's not one of the best signs either.

why domain use bitmixer, same with old bitcoin mixer service , bitmixer.io
or this thread same company with bitmixer.io, only use new domain

It's not. It's a new service with a different team

I agree with your argument about the address and the process of mixing, that could and must be fixed, but a legendary member worth more

Than 0.01 or 0.02BTC don't you think? because if I ever want to use this mixer, I'd only send the minimum amounts at least for a month or two

Before trusting with 0.5+BTC in each transaction, however due to existence of other mixers such as chip and blender among other services the

Only thing standing on the OP's way to successfully replace and claim the number one rank of Bitmixer is the lack of advertisement. if you ask

Bitmixer.io's admin, I'm sure he'll tell you that he was sharing a huge percentage of his income with signature participants at least for the first

2 years and only his earnings started to grow exponentially in the last year of his running business which was 2016 and the first 4 months of 2017.

[Argwai96]

I wish you good luck, at this moment I'm also working on a new mixing service.

few advices:

you can't open a system which is still in beta. you're doing those mixing by yourself and it is not automated like it should be.

could storage --> hot storage ---> client address .

I also see you're using javascript which is the number one rule of not to.

You did not make TOR connection which the basic of mixing. USING TOR.

wish you good luck.

[Cluster2k]

First of all thanks to everyone for the feedback and suggestions.

I understand that a moderated thread sounds not-so-good for this kind of services but I'm not going to abuse of this feature in any way, negative comments and critics will be tolerated unless they become offensive, that's why I choose to use a moderated one. In my long experience here I've seen that trolling could go at its finest here,so better to prevent instead of fixing.

About the mixing process, this is just a beta because Crypto community lost Bitmixer.io few days ago, a service very useful for everyone, and I felt that something like this was needed.
I'm not the owner of the closed Bitmixer and I believe that privacy is a matter of human rights, so this is the reason why I started a mixing service.

I will update the software daily to improve the backend techniques and gain the trust of the community.

Hear soon.

[Cluster2k]

Bitmixer.io is currently under backend maintenance while I perform some upgrades and fix.

Hear soon.

[In the silence]

Oh a new bitcoin mixer, goodluck with your service. I think your thread should be here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=84.0 and improve the announcement.

[pikebu]

I'm happy to announce the new Bitcoin Mixer and Tumbler www.bitmixer.co

No logs, no accounts, no tracking.
Feel free to leave your feedback here.

The website is good could be accessed by smartphone and i like it, do you have plan to decrease the minimum of bitcoins to mix on your service? The minimum of bitcoins accepted on the service is 0.01 bitcoins, it is too much for the users who want try your service, i think you must decrease the minimum of transaction to 0.001 bitcoins, it will be more good to test mix the bitcoins on your service. Thank you

[twinstarrider72]

When is it back online again?

[btcton]

The fact that this BitMixer has the same name as the old one is cause for concern, in my opinion. It could be used to deceive people into thinking it is the same service as the old and trusted BitMixer that closed down recently. Those who are not aware of the fact that it closed could think this is the same service and even those who do know might believe that the site simply reopened for some reason. While I have no real use of a mixer myself other than to vouch for them, I would sit and wait for a bit before using this to make sure that it is legit and that trusted members of the community vouch for its legitimacy. The mixer itself seems to be backed by a Legendary member already, so that's a good start to begin with.

[tsaroz]

It certainly came to fulfill the void created by bitmixer.
Naming it similar to bitmixer is a simple strategy.
Hope this too gets similar success as bitmixer got.

[ChipMixer]

Trust cannot be created by naming your service the same as competition.
Naming your new service the same as old and reputable service is done to trick potential users to trust you.

[Argwai96]

Trust cannot be created by naming your service the same as competition.
Naming your new service the same as old and reputable service is done to trick potential users to trust you.

I agree! I would love giving new players their chances, but it must be gained from zero and not based on previous companies.

[freebutcaged]

Trust cannot be created by naming your service the same as competition.
Naming your new service the same as old and reputable service is done to trick potential users to trust you.

Trick is Chipmixer.io or .net mate, there is no competition, the previous Bitmixer is no longer in business, so it's not considered fooling trick.

Anyone having enough Bitcoins and in need of mixing them is smart and knows the difference. if this service becomes a reliable and trusted

One, I see no reason why it shouldn't beat you(Chipmixer) in competition. only thing they need is more advertisements than you plus completing

Their platform. in my country an application which is for taxi calling spent $1M just to advertise their app even before earning $10,000.

Advertisement is the first and most important part of any business. if this mixer advertises much like you then your job will become harder to compete.

[Gleb Gamow]

Sorry for the little typo in the OP, now website link works fine.

Uhm, nope. I don't have too high hopes for as technical site as this, if the launch fails easily like this :/
The site should have at least been tested before announcing it anywhere.

Edit: Starting post still says bitcoinmixer.co instead of bitmixer.co

FWIW, at least the domain has its servers in the country of California where the feds won't be able to take it down: http://domainbigdata.com/192.64.119.120

[onnz423]

FWIW, at least the domain has its servers in the country of California where the feds won't be able to take it down: http://domainbigdata.com/192.64.119.120

Im not that familiar with US laws, but could this potentially be considered laundering at most states? However i do not think that USA is best place to host such service at, hidden service would have been way better option IMO.
Hosting the servers on one of the nordic countries would have probably been alot better to the site. For example when piratebay was hosting  the servers still at sweden, they were protected by the laws. I hope OP is not a US citizen because if service as this is not protected by law, the justice system at states i consider inhuman for some certain crimes.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Bitmixer.io is currently under backend maintenance while I perform some upgrades and fix.

Hear soon.

Is this a typo  And for the record the bitmixer website name has had several copy cats during its time how will you ensure users do not get scammed by phishing sites posing to be the real BITMIXER.CO
All the best OP in the tumbling business  we need this competition

[shield132]

Oh guys, whatever will happem, no one can believe me that your mixer is really mixer and not a shit scam. Cmon man, you create website with very known name: Bitmixer. And you do this after they closed. Changing .io to .co don't means you are like new company.
Don't want to be rude but I think this thread must be closed and removed. Site which claims to be safe mixer and uses another mixer's name, isn't something to trust.