[ANN] ** NEW SITE bitgem.pw ** BTG BitGem 0.4.9.ALPHA1 | COLORED COINS | FAUCET

[MobGod]

Is there any reason bitgemd doesn't support the networkhashps or netmhashps property of getmininginfo?

If I'm correct all pow coins do this not sure why. On another note anyway you can answer my above question ?

[1715013195]

1715013195

[1715013195]

1715013195

[1715013195]

1715013195

[1715013195]

1715013195

[1715013195]

1715013195

[mineral]

Getting checkpoint is too old messages after updating the client and redownloading the blockchain.

Added checkpoints in https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.

For gemwallet, I am finishing some developments, so you can rebuild the 'classic' client or wait a little with the WARINING message.

Remember it is needed to update to 0.4.1.5 version before 15 Jul and  block #14,200. It is planned new rounded fix be from #14,200 block.

Some possible next directions of BTG include:

- tagged-coins,
- sticky transactions,
- true colored-coins.

I will write a more detailed post about it.

[MobGod]

Getting checkpoint is too old messages after updating the client and redownloading the blockchain.

Added checkpoints in https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.

For gemwallet, I am finishing some developments, so you can rebuild the 'classic' client or wait a little with the WARINING message.

Remember it is needed to update to 0.4.1.5 version before 15 Jul and  block #14,200. It is planned new rounded fix be from #14,200 block.

Some possible next directions of BTG include:

- tagged-coins,
- sticky transactions,
- true colored-coins.

I will write a more detailed post about it.

thanks for the info mineral but only question I have right now is what can we do with the diamonds etc... is it something for us to have instead of coins ? also for pos do i need to keep my wallet running for that to work coreect ?

[mineral]

Getting checkpoint is too old messages after updating the client and redownloading the blockchain.

Added checkpoints in https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.

For gemwallet, I am finishing some developments, so you can rebuild the 'classic' client or wait a little with the WARINING message.

Remember it is needed to update to 0.4.1.5 version before 15 Jul and  block #14,200. It is planned new rounded fix be from #14,200 block.

Some possible next directions of BTG include:

- tagged-coins,
- sticky transactions,
- true colored-coins.

I will write a more detailed post about it.

thanks for the info mineral but only question I have right now is what can we do with the diamonds etc... is it something for us to have instead of coins ? also for pos do i need to keep my wallet running for that to work coreect ?

I will depend on if they are considered as tagged or colored coins.

[MobGod]

Getting checkpoint is too old messages after updating the client and redownloading the blockchain.

Added checkpoints in https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.

For gemwallet, I am finishing some developments, so you can rebuild the 'classic' client or wait a little with the WARINING message.

Remember it is needed to update to 0.4.1.5 version before 15 Jul and  block #14,200. It is planned new rounded fix be from #14,200 block.

Some possible next directions of BTG include:

- tagged-coins,
- sticky transactions,
- true colored-coins.

I will write a more detailed post about it.

thanks for the info mineral but only question I have right now is what can we do with the diamonds etc... is it something for us to have instead of coins ? also for pos do i need to keep my wallet running for that to work coreect ?

I will depend on if they are considered as tagged or colored coins.

Ok so if I exchange my coins for diamonds or anything like that could I exchange them back to coins do they keep the same value or that does change with what gem you get?

[sterob]

Getting checkpoint is too old messages after updating the client and redownloading the blockchain.

Added checkpoints in https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.

For gemwallet, I am finishing some developments, so you can rebuild the 'classic' client or wait a little with the WARINING message.

Remember it is needed to update to 0.4.1.5 version before 15 Jul and  block #14,200. It is planned new rounded fix be from #14,200 block.

Some possible next directions of BTG include:

- tagged-coins,
- sticky transactions,
- true colored-coins.

I will write a more detailed post about it.

how do i update check point for the windows qt client?

[mullick]

Getting checkpoint is too old messages after updating the client and redownloading the blockchain.

Added checkpoints in https://github.com/bitgem/bitgem.

For gemwallet, I am finishing some developments, so you can rebuild the 'classic' client or wait a little with the WARINING message.

Remember it is needed to update to 0.4.1.5 version before 15 Jul and  block #14,200. It is planned new rounded fix be from #14,200 block.

Some possible next directions of BTG include:

- tagged-coins,
- sticky transactions,
- true colored-coins.

I will write a more detailed post about it.

how do i update check point for the windows qt client?

You can either compile from sources or wait until the next QT release. Im not sure if its giving out the checkpoint warning still. Try redownloading the blockchain.

Close your client delete everything in appdata/roaming/bitgem except wallet.dat and bitgem.conf if you have one and restart the client

[sterob]

uninstalled bitgem client, delete all except my wallet file. Still  same warning.

[tupacshomey]

Yes are there any other pools besides those two. The first has it maximum users reached and btg.binarycoins.eu, well I gave up about 2 days of work when it opened and had ~30 gem payout, then bam stats restarted and left me with 0.

I do and did understand the risks in a new pool, but damn did it hurt. There was also no announcement on their news tab about apologies or compensation, what a waste of hashing power. Hope i atleast helped the gentleman advance his coding techniques or something.

[mullick]

Yes are there any other pools besides those two. The first has it maximum users reached and btg.binarycoins.eu, well I gave up about 2 days of work when it opened and had ~30 gem payout, then bam stats restarted and left me with 0.

I do and did understand the risks in a new pool, but damn did it hurt. There was also no announcement on their news tab about apologies or compensation, what a waste of hashing power. Hope i atleast helped the gentleman advance his coding techniques or something.

btg.binarycoins.eu is back up. My balance was still in my account. I would reccomend contacting the pool owner about that

[mullick]

uninstalled bitgem client, delete all except my wallet file. Still  same warning.

Yep you will need to wait for the update. Dot worry about the warning for now. It will be fixed with the next release. Doesnt affect anything

[rovchris]

Quite a few of the blocks I have mined recently  - 1 in 5 is showing as Amount 0 in my wallet.

Take these transactions for example

http://btg.webboise.com:2750/chain/Bitgem

5ea59e2d3b3183e92292b81de71fdf1b1e32d1a5ec1cfdee7abdf3e83f0f3009

03cf49387a7b1951a808be79804b4b04de8590e824428b2d4a1939a50adf45e1

56a89210e81bf4cedaeb9c700fb194d232887791f4ced81de8bce734ff2ba5f1

f64659d821895ec5c75dfa52cc9a411839e8f711a7ca113b5f3f0af43282aa72

db294c2beb2d12b15aae462eee30c47b2046a9ee332ac0f36d31d50ca4bcf347


They are not showing as rejected by the network and are being confirmed but have zero amount.

Any ideas?

[mullick]

Quite a few of the blocks I have mined recently  - 1 in 5 is showing as Amount 0 in my wallet.

Take these transactions for example

http://btg.webboise.com:2750/chain/Bitgem

5ea59e2d3b3183e92292b81de71fdf1b1e32d1a5ec1cfdee7abdf3e83f0f3009

03cf49387a7b1951a808be79804b4b04de8590e824428b2d4a1939a50adf45e1

56a89210e81bf4cedaeb9c700fb194d232887791f4ced81de8bce734ff2ba5f1

f64659d821895ec5c75dfa52cc9a411839e8f711a7ca113b5f3f0af43282aa72

db294c2beb2d12b15aae462eee30c47b2046a9ee332ac0f36d31d50ca4bcf347


They are not showing as rejected by the network and are being confirmed but have zero amount.

Any ideas?

The blocks that are showing as 0 are PoS blocks. he current ROI for PoS is .0015% and rewards are being rounded to 0 the recent update applied a fix to this which will be active on July 15th

[rovchris]

Thanks for responding!

At least I know what is going on now.

[mineral]

Stake reward round fix has been succesfull.

Last stake rewards from previous month are being mined still, so it is provided current month RoI next.

[snaidervp]

Stake reward round fix has been succesfull.

Last stake rewards from previous month are being mined still, so it is provided current month RoI next.

good to know, keep up the good work mate

(show some love to the BTG community and keep us updated more frequently )

[svost]

fresh install (git clone)

/bin/bitgem/src> ./bitgemd getinfo
{
    "version" : "v0.4.1-nvc-23-g92f265d-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60006,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 13536,
    "moneysupply" : 17717.25413800,
    "connections" : 2,
    "proxy" : "XXXXXXXXXXX",
    "ip" : "XXXXXXX",
    "difficulty" : 1.37620748,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1374060342,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "errors" : "WARNING: Checkpoint is too old. Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers."
}
/bin/bitgem/src> 

[mineral]

fresh install (git clone)

/bin/bitgem/src> ./bitgemd getinfo
{
    "version" : "v0.4.1-nvc-23-g92f265d-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60006,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 13536,
    "moneysupply" : 17717.25413800,
    "connections" : 2,
    "proxy" : "XXXXXXXXXXX",
    "ip" : "XXXXXXX",
    "difficulty" : 1.37620748,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1374060342,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "errors" : "WARNING: Checkpoint is too old. Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers."
}
/bin/bitgem/src>  

The warning message is go out with last checkpoints.

You should  to add secure nodes, delete database, rescan database.

I will rebuild gemWallet with last checkpoints.

Code:

{
    "version" : "v0.4.1-nvc-23-g92f265d-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60006,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 13899,
    "moneysupply" : 17805.56815800,
    "connections" : 8,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "",
    "difficulty" : 1.85588469,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1368696291,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Code:

[
    {
        "addr" : "188.126.8.14:7692",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1374089092,
        "lastrecv" : 1374089092,
        "conntime" : 1374087818,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 13895,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "97.86.15.238:7692",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1374089093,
        "lastrecv" : 1374089093,
        "conntime" : 1374087825,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 13895,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "178.32.218.153:7692",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1374089093,
        "lastrecv" : 1374088241,
        "conntime" : 1374087826,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 13536,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "50.89.148.247:7692",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1374088244,
        "lastrecv" : 1374089092,
        "conntime" : 1374087855,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 13896,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "70.98.114.229:7692",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1374089093,
        "lastrecv" : 1374088654,
        "conntime" : 1374087856,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 13536,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "192.81.209.17:7692",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1374089093,
        "lastrecv" : 1374089093,
        "conntime" : 1374087875,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 13536,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "199.192.205.46:7692",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1374089093,
        "lastrecv" : 1374089093,
        "conntime" : 1374088009,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 13896,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "93.96.132.70:7692",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1374089093,
        "lastrecv" : 1374089093,
        "conntime" : 1374088210,
        "version" : 60006,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 13898,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]

[Kosmatik]

Anyone else notice that it's stuck on block 14064?

[mullick]

Anyone else notice that it's stuck on block 14064?

I pushed it through. At block 14093 now