Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[ryzaadit]

-snip

100% relates.

I always things is based only waggering, but we just don't know how much number we need to reach for receive the full allocation amount depends on the rank we have. We just don't know those and agree with you too about unpredictable bonus.

It's hard to guess.

[Dunamisx]

🥇 [Over $9,000] Quest for Glory! | VIP Originals🔥



Win a bet on Slots - Scarab Spin with the highest multiplier that you can.
 
The minimum multiplier that you should get to qualify is 50x.
 
0.5 USD minimum bet amount (in any currency).

Giveaway's Topic: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/153412-%F0%9F%A5%87-over-9000-quest-for-glory-vip-originals%F0%9F%94%A5/

Interesting, this is all about customer's experience in playing, because they will always have new offers each time to unleashed for dedicated users playing, crab spin is another opportunity for the multiplier games  gamblers, let's watch out for more being unfolding, because offers like this are for big winning opportunities in the same direction.

[Mahdirakib]

However almost all bonuses in Stake are unpredictable, just like the VIP ladder bonus that I received several days ago which was something unexpected at all.

The VIP ladder bonus is extremely rare. The bonus amounts and timings are unpredictable. Only the weekly and monthly bonuses are guaranteed. Stake were giving pre or post monthly bonuses every month in the last year. We had received both of those bonuses for several months continuously. Which had increased the hopes of the users about those bonuses. And now they have made the pre and post monthly bonuses unpredictable by not giving them each month.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

However almost all bonuses in Stake are unpredictable, just like the VIP ladder bonus that I received several days ago which was something unexpected at all.

The VIP ladder bonus is extremely rare. The bonus amounts and timings are unpredictable. Only the weekly and monthly bonuses are guaranteed. Stake were giving pre or post monthly bonuses every month in the last year. We had received both of those bonuses for several months continuously. Which had increased the hopes of the users about those bonuses. And now they have made the pre and post monthly bonuses unpredictable by not giving them each month.

You are not new to stake, so you should know that pre and post monthly bonuses never came each month, not in the close past and also not long time ago. They just come when they come.
About the VIP latter, actually they are predictable, at least for the amount. Platinum 5 and 6 get 356$ exactly, platinum 3 and 4 get the same fixed amount and so do plat 1 & 2.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

It's not unpredicatble, It's easy to spot on.

Basically those bonuses are show up at the time we making a big progress % on the VIP we are made. Basically big waggering can trigered these bonus, and just don't know how much % waggering needed to trigered those.

But the special one from @panjul case. He was receive with monthly waggering, checking his stats Day, Weekly & other are not making waggering at all, only during the month he have a number;16,000$.

[Symphonized]

💰[$3,000] Royal Club of Originals | Tome of Life 🎰



Win a bet on Tome of Life with a minimum 90x multiplier.

0.03 USD minimum bet amount (in any currency).

Giveaway's Topic: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/153898-%F0%9F%92%B03000-royal-club-of-originals-tome-of-life-%F0%9F%8E%B0/#comment-3018420

[memehunter]

Post monthly bonus is out. Please check your emails for the link to redeem post monthly bonus. My post monthly is around $10 and it is not bad considering the amount I have wagered in last couple of weeks (almost zero lol). The timing to post monthly this time is on spot, at the exact month ending.
Now we can assume safely that monthly will be awarded for the October in the first week itself along with my crypto reward bonus (also due in the starting of October).
Now all I want is a max win on any slot hahah.

[Akbarkoe]

Post monthly bonus is out. Please check your emails for the link to redeem post monthly bonus. My post monthly is around $10 and it is not bad considering the amount I have wagered in last couple of weeks (almost zero lol). The timing to post monthly this time is on spot, at the exact month ending.
Now we can assume safely that monthly will be awarded for the October in the first week itself along with my crypto reward bonus (also due in the starting of October).
Now all I want is a max win on any slot hahah.

Congratulations on your monthly bonus, and enjoy it to the fullest.

Slot games are a lot of fun, but your bonus will run out quickly if you lose. However, we hope you get lucky this time, and don't forget to share it if you win big with your monthly bonus, friends.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Post monthly bonus is out. Please check your emails for the link to redeem post monthly bonus. My post monthly is around $10 and it is not bad considering the amount I have wagered in last couple of weeks (almost zero lol). The timing to post monthly this time is on spot, at the exact month ending.
Now we can assume safely that monthly will be awarded for the October in the first week itself along with my crypto reward bonus (also due in the starting of October).
Now all I want is a max win on any slot hahah.

Monthly in the first week? Nah man, it will be around 15th, as always. 15th is also a Wednesday so it is basically the perfect day/timing to release the regular monthly. If not on the exact date it will definitely be the week around it, 13th-17th.

Anyway, my bonus today was not worth mentioning.   Guess the one in about 2 weeks will just be the same.

[Bitinity]

Post monthly bonus is out. Please check your emails for the link to redeem post monthly bonus. My post monthly is around $10 and it is not bad considering the amount I have wagered in last couple of weeks (almost zero lol). The timing to post monthly this time is on spot, at the exact month ending.
Now we can assume safely that monthly will be awarded for the October in the first week itself along with my crypto reward bonus (also due in the starting of October).
Now all I want is a max win on any slot hahah.

Monthly in the first week? Nah man, it will be around 15th, as always. 15th is also a Wednesday so it is basically the perfect day/timing to release the regular monthly. If not on the exact date it will definitely be the week around it, 13th-17th.

Anyway, my bonus today was not worth mentioning.   Guess the one in about 2 weeks will just be the same.

Monthly sent in the first week of a month will only happen in special event only like in August as the time of birthday celebration, in normal month without special event then monthly will be on the middle of the month. Or if we use common timeframe 30 days after the previous monthly bonus which was sent on Sept 10 if I remember it correctly, so the possible earlier day for Stake to send the October's monthly bonus will be on 10th or max on 17th.

[Mahdirakib]

You are not new to stake, so you should know that pre and post monthly bonuses never came each month, not in the close past and also not long time ago. They just come when they come.

Well, Stake has sent either the pre-monthly bonus or the post-monthly bonus on each month of this year. I thought that Stake hadn't given the pre and post monthly bonus much this year. But I was surprised when I checked my mailbox. They haven't sent both of those bonuses in the same month though. But I remember that Stake had given both pre and post monthly bonuses on two to three months in the previous year. FYI, here is the date of pre or post monthly bonus of this year.

• 3 January - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 5 February - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 24 March - Post-monthly Bonus
• 24 April - Post-monthly Bonus
• 1 May - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 29 June - Post-monthly Bonus
• 24 July - Post-monthly Bonus
• 21 August - Post-monthly Bonus
• 30 September - Post-monthly Bonus

[Wakate]

You are not new to stake, so you should know that pre and post monthly bonuses never came each month, not in the close past and also not long time ago. They just come when they come.

Well, Stake has sent either the pre-monthly bonus or the post-monthly bonus on each month of this year. I thought that Stake hadn't given the pre and post monthly bonus much this year. But I was surprised when I checked my mailbox. They haven't sent both of those bonuses in the same month though. But I remember that Stake had given both pre and post monthly bonuses on two to three months in the previous year. FYI, here is the date of pre or post monthly bonus of this year.

• 3 January - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 5 February - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 24 March - Post-monthly Bonus
• 24 April - Post-monthly Bonus
• 1 May - Pre-monthly Bonus
• 29 June - Post-monthly Bonus
• 24 July - Post-monthly Bonus
• 21 August - Post-monthly Bonus
• 30 September - Post-monthly Bonus

Does it means you went to your mail and check the dates they were all sent to you? Wow, this is quite amazing for your smart move! I've not been checking my mail lately for this kind of mail but I think I will have to check for them too if I'm going to see similar mails like these ones. You must have been a old player on the Stake Casino for quite a long time.

[Hispo]

...

Well, isn't it always like that? Same for slots when you are gambling with play money. Suddenly you get like free spins and all that stuff you never see when you actually play with your own real money.  They always claim it's the same chance but seeing this all the time it's somehow hard to believe. Same with originals, "provable fair" or not, it's still a fact that once you raise the wager the losing run is inbound. Call me crazy but that's just my experience. 

It could be we all are biased and psychologically prepared to pay more attention to losses when we use real money rather then we use play money and pay more attention to having a good time and having more fun with nothing actually at risk of being taken away from us.

There is also a possibility of some small letter sections of the contract/ term of service of gams providers, stating the actual chances of winning money are applied when gamblers use real money, in the case they use fake/play money providers would enhance the chances of winning on their games, with the excuse of showing off animations and interactions on the demo mode.

[Jody.Drummer]

...

Well, isn't it always like that? Same for slots when you are gambling with play money. Suddenly you get like free spins and all that stuff you never see when you actually play with your own real money.  They always claim it's the same chance but seeing this all the time it's somehow hard to believe. Same with originals, "provable fair" or not, it's still a fact that once you raise the wager the losing run is inbound. Call me crazy but that's just my experience. 

It could be we all are biased and psychologically prepared to pay more attention to losses when we use real money rather then we use play money and pay more attention to having a good time and having more fun with nothing actually at risk of being taken away from us.

There is also a possibility of some small letter sections of the contract/ term of service of gams providers, stating the actual chances of winning money are applied when gamblers use real money, in the case they use fake/play money providers would enhance the chances of winning on their games, with the excuse of showing off animations and interactions on the demo mode.

A fair game doesn't mean a game with an equal chance of winning and losing. We must also recognize that gambling relies on luck. It's also important to remember that there will always be winners and losers, and for me, luck is the deciding factor.
Even in demo games, we'll lose more often, right? Therefore, before we gamble, we must understand the basics of gambling. And of course, once we understand this, we must be prepared for the potential losses.

[Dicbac]

whoever is coming up with these buy-in to prize pool ratios for poker must be off their rocker cus no, nein, нeт they do not make sense

...

Well, isn't it always like that? Same for slots when you are gambling with play money. Suddenly you get like free spins and all that stuff you never see when you actually play with your own real money.  They always claim it's the same chance but seeing this all the time it's somehow hard to believe. Same with originals, "provable fair" or not, it's still a fact that once you raise the wager the losing run is inbound. Call me crazy but that's just my experience. 

It could be we all are biased and psychologically prepared to pay more attention to losses when we use real money rather then we use play money and pay more attention to having a good time and having more fun with nothing actually at risk of being taken away from us.

There is also a possibility of some small letter sections of the contract/ term of service of gams providers, stating the actual chances of winning money are applied when gamblers use real money, in the case they use fake/play money providers would enhance the chances of winning on their games, with the excuse of showing off animations and interactions on the demo mode.

A fair game doesn't mean a game with an equal chance of winning and losing. We must also recognize that gambling relies on luck. It's also important to remember that there will always be winners and losers, and for me, luck is the deciding factor.
Even in demo games, we'll lose more often, right? Therefore, before we gamble, we must understand the basics of gambling. And of course, once we understand this, we must be prepared for the potential losses.

its annoying as all hell losing and every single time in my head im saying scam and wishing death upon everyone, though that lasts 5-10 minutes, after which i just be annoyed at myself for poor bankroll management or getting too strung up on a game that i just didnt stop when i shoulda. i understand how the provably fair system operates and have pulled json files filled with my bets and analysed them on several occasions and the proof is right there in front of you if you do this because it is undeniably not doing anything weird with the sequence or amounts being calculated for each bet. ive had both sides happen, extreme luck and extreme lack of luck. Guaranteed i do not remember half as many of the lucky times as i do the unlucky times. That isnt a sign of something being nefariously manipulated or anything, that is pretty much a textbook example of gamblers fallacy.

Anyhow, if you are playing a game you think is rigged and continue to play it anyway, or continue to play at that casino day after day regardless, you deserve the misfortune cus thats just lacking in intelligence and awareness, the worst combo to be lacking in.

[memehunter]

whoever is coming up with these buy-in to prize pool ratios for poker must be off their rocker cus no, nein, нeт they do not make sense

If you are comparing it to other poker platforms with hundreds of thousands of poker players, yes it is bonkas  . But you to keep in mind that competition is also very less, and there are more chances to win a $20 tournament with 60 players rather than 20$ tournament with 10,000 players. Bear in mind Stake is not poker specific platform and you will encounter many more loose players (tilted gamblers) which makes playing on Stake much more profitable. I am telling you this from my personal first hand experience.   

[Dicbac]

whoever is coming up with these buy-in to prize pool ratios for poker must be off their rocker cus no, nein, нeт they do not make sense

If you are comparing it to other poker platforms with hundreds of thousands of poker players, yes it is bonkas  . But you to keep in mind that competition is also very less, and there are more chances to win a $20 tournament with 60 players rather than 20$ tournament with 10,000 players. Bear in mind Stake is not poker specific platform and you will encounter many more loose players (tilted gamblers) which makes playing on Stake much more profitable. I am telling you this from my personal first hand experience.  

what are you waffling about exactly? cus it doesnt apply to the obvious thing i am getting at. currently the next several tournaments are as follows

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$10 buy-in → $400 prize

$1 buy-in → $75 prize

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$10 buy-in → $400 prize

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$5 buy-in → $200 prize

$5 buy-in → $100 prize

$2 buy-in → $200 prize

make it make sense

whoever is coming up with these buy-in to prize pool ratios for poker must be off their rocker cus no, nein, нeт they do not make sense

If you are comparing it to other poker platforms with hundreds of thousands of poker players, yes it is bonkas  . But you to keep in mind that competition is also very less, and there are more chances to win a $20 tournament with 60 players rather than 20$ tournament with 10,000 players. Bear in mind Stake is not poker specific platform and you will encounter many more loose players (tilted gamblers) which makes playing on Stake much more profitable. I am telling you this from my personal first hand experience.  

there is literally one poker platform that achieves over 100k frequently and that is ggpoker, just fyi. competition isnt less it is more. gamblers gambling is not easier than vs someone that knows how to play good poker. I know, ive won the freerolls twice so far. Much more luck required. where on earth did u come up with these outcomes of stake's experience vs something like pokerstars? baffling to say the least. do you play poker? any anyway, to round off dismissing your claims, stake makes way more than every poker platform, minus ggpoker, combined.

[memehunter]

whoever is coming up with these buy-in to prize pool ratios for poker must be off their rocker cus no, nein, нeт they do not make sense

If you are comparing it to other poker platforms with hundreds of thousands of poker players, yes it is bonkas  . But you to keep in mind that competition is also very less, and there are more chances to win a $20 tournament with 60 players rather than 20$ tournament with 10,000 players. Bear in mind Stake is not poker specific platform and you will encounter many more loose players (tilted gamblers) which makes playing on Stake much more profitable. I am telling you this from my personal first hand experience.   

what are you waffling about exactly? cus it doesnt apply to the obvious thing i am getting at. currently the next several tournaments are as follows

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$10 buy-in → $400 prize

$1 buy-in → $75 prize

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$10 buy-in → $400 prize

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$5 buy-in → $200 prize

$5 buy-in → $100 prize

$2 buy-in → $200 prize

make it make sense

Ok tell me what should be the preferred ratio? There are some premium tournaments (one or two per day) like, $20 buy in which has $1500 GTD prize and other normal tournaments. You will find the same theme almost everywhere. Dont compare it to poker platform with hundreds of thousands of players, hosting WSOP. I have already made my point regarding profitability which you don't seem to agree with but it is okay, your money your choices.

[Dicbac]

whoever is coming up with these buy-in to prize pool ratios for poker must be off their rocker cus no, nein, нeт they do not make sense

If you are comparing it to other poker platforms with hundreds of thousands of poker players, yes it is bonkas  . But you to keep in mind that competition is also very less, and there are more chances to win a $20 tournament with 60 players rather than 20$ tournament with 10,000 players. Bear in mind Stake is not poker specific platform and you will encounter many more loose players (tilted gamblers) which makes playing on Stake much more profitable. I am telling you this from my personal first hand experience.  

what are you waffling about exactly? cus it doesnt apply to the obvious thing i am getting at. currently the next several tournaments are as follows

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$10 buy-in → $400 prize

$1 buy-in → $75 prize

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$10 buy-in → $400 prize

$2 buy-in → $100 prize

$5 buy-in → $200 prize

$5 buy-in → $100 prize

$2 buy-in → $200 prize

make it make sense

Ok tell me what should be the preferred ratio? There are some premium tournaments (one or two per day) like, $20 buy in which has $1500 GTD prize and other normal tournaments. You will find the same theme almost everywhere. Dont compare it to poker platform with hundreds of thousands of players, hosting WSOP. I have already made my point regarding profitability which you don't seem to agree with but it is okay, your money your choices.

there is literally one poker platform that achieves over 100k frequently and that is ggpoker, just fyi. competition isnt less it is more. gamblers gambling is not easier than vs someone that knows how to play good poker. I know, ive won the freerolls twice so far. Much more luck required. where on earth did u come up with these outcomes of stake's experience vs something like pokerstars? baffling to say the least. do you play poker?  anyway, to round off dismissing your claims, stake makes way more than every poker platform, minus ggpoker, combined.

i feel like the question of my preferred ratio of prizes to buy-ins is too simple to waste my time explaining. here is an brief example.

assuming the same game and type - if $2 buy in has prize of $100, $4 should have $200. Linear. Not erratic. Starting to think you've played a part in coming up with this mess lmao.

[memehunter]

there is literally one poker platform that achieves over 100k frequently and that is ggpoker, just fyi.

Thanks for enhancing my knowledge about ggpoker, despite I am playing there for many years.

competition isnt less it is more. gamblers gambling is not easier than vs someone that knows how to play good poker.

So you are arguing no matter how skilled a player is make no difference? Definitely you will encounter more pro players at gg, correct me if I am wrong.

I know, ive won the freerolls twice so far. Much more luck required. where on earth did u come up with these outcomes of stake's experience vs something like pokerstars? baffling to say the least. do you play poker? 

I guess I have played a little bit, won some tournaments (luckily) at stakes and on many platforms. I have played many sessions of cash games as well at stake (for almost one year low to mid stakes) so all I was telling you was from my experience. I totally get it that you are not in agreement, which is okay mate.

anyway, to round off dismissing your claims, stake makes way more than every poker platform, minus ggpoker, combined.

Yes, but stake is not specialized in poker and that was precisely my point.