[ANN][CHIPS] KMD platform's LN app with realtime betting+decentralized shuffling

[komodomining]

./chips-cli getblocksubsidy
error code: -32601
error message:
Method not found


no getblocksubsidy right?

[jl777B]

./chips-cli getblocksubsidy
error code: -32601
error message:
Method not found


no getblocksubsidy right?

it is a recent BTC fork

[jl777B]

n41r0j [10:32 PM]
@jl777 CHIPS has been bartered with KMD, add this to coins file: {\"coin\":\"CHIPS\", \"name\": \"chips\", \"rpcport\":57776,\"pubtype\":60, \"p2shtype\":85, \"wiftype\":188, \"txfee\":1000}

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
SWAP completed! 3678262194-3477173309 {"requestid":3678262194,"quoteid":3477173309,"txs":[],"sentflags":["alicespend", "bobspend", "bobpayment", "alicepayment", "bobdeposit", "bobrefund"],"values":[19.99950999, 19.99969999, 19.99960999, 19.99979999, 22.49955998, 0, 0, 22.49945998, 0, 0, 0],"result":"success","status":"finished","paymentspent":"fa82f6c6559b09cc035f9ad9b832a6b606861027701b04a1eda0946a7f619f28","Apaymentspent":"6bee5834c253903a8ff43888f3fdea37c2980afc17f736fa855f0f6e22bd8e11","depositspent":"b9ac559f59bf4fa539b084313693234c8691d3b144d6c8a92835d22460257bcd"}

[marte1982]

"difficulty": 3195527.840196703,

[jl777B]

"difficulty": 3195527.840196703,

No need for that hash in testnet even dev said in op that he is not sure if this blockchain will become real chips.

  "difficulty": 7089627.304768353,

hashrate is right around 3 petahash.

This is all really quite unexpected. I did apply for exchange listing, we should hear back in about a week, but I cant control the timing.

we will soon have an up to date explorer and then maybe even a basic website. If you want to be a key contributor for a hot new coin, now is the time to get in involved.

[jl777B]

It seems we are above 10 petahash now?
  "difficulty": 16977993.36874614,

does anybody have an estimate for market price based on the hashrate?

[Birka]

It seems we are above 10 petahash now?
  "difficulty": 16977993.36874614,

does anybody have an estimate for market price based on the hashrate?

I'll probably post an obvious thing most guys here understand, but to not do it would mean jeopardizing a lot of newbies' BTC in a week or so, which would consequently lead to a lot of unnecessary disappointment.



Hashrate hype is caused by 2-3 guys solomining from the beginning. For 80k blocks difficulty was low enough to mine with CPU. Guess who's renting now?
I see no point in mining CHIPS atm and would recommend everyone to stay away until they are tradeable for at least a month or two.

[draculacoin]

what is unique on this coin?

[shogun47]

What's the situation with a pool? Has there been any progress towards that goal?

[polycryptoblog]

what is unique on this coin?

First real-world Lightning Network implementation. 

[jl777B]

What's the situation with a pool? Has there been any progress towards that goal?

3 of them on OP

[barthe]

Hello,

Where is possible to buy any CHIP?

Thx

[jl777B]

What's the situation with a pool? Has there been any progress towards that goal?

3 of them on OP

now we are up to four pools

[jl777B]

Rusty massively reorganized the c-lightning repo, so it took some hours to merge the changes and get things put back together.

I got it running, but some initial connections are not being made now. Once that is fixed, I should be able to run it without many of the recent bugs in the lightning code as part of the massive changes were a bunch of bug fixes.

Separately, I have game state machines mostly generalized and I think it will work for a variety of games. Current simulation just goes through N rounds of random player actions. But it also does a "send all your money to the dealer" logic while simulating games.

So, the todo list is:

1. Get latest code working as it was before and make sure bugs are fixed
2. implement an actual game's statemachine
3. incorporate CHIPS betting into this game
4. allow user input (via curl) to affect betting/gameplay
5. implement the dealer payout to winning player(s)

It seems like a lot, but really it is a small percentage of what has already been achieved. I think knowledge of this by some miners explains the hashrate and to be fair to those not monitoring slack/github I post the details here

[shogun47]

What's the situation with a pool? Has there been any progress towards that goal?

3 of them on OP

now we are up to four pools

Oops ok, missed that. Will check it out now.

[komodomining]

We are proud to announce our NEW CHIPS POOL

Welcome to  http://chipspool.cloud a dedicated mining pool for CHIPS, the newest SuperNET LN technology with SHA256 ALGO!

- Anonymous mining
- Personal mining stats
- Address.workers for multiple stats
- Reward type: PROP (Proportional. When block is found, the reward is distributed among all workers proportionally to how much shares each of them has found)
- Stratum and auto vardiff for efficient mining
- BIG FARM PORT 3333  ( 65000 ~ 5000000 difficulty )
- Backup server cluster for high High Availability & Downtime
- No fee payout, auto payout 0.1 CHIPS
- 1% fees
- Support with Gitter chat

DOWNLOAD WHATEVER SOFTWARE YOU'D LIKE FOR CPU, GPU, OR ASIC MINING AND START MINING NOW!

stratum+tcp://chipspool.cloud:3333 ( Auto VarDiff from 65536 to 5000000 ) BIG FARM
stratum+tcp://chipspool.cloud:4444 ( Auto VarDiff from 8 to 32 ) Small Rigs
stratum+tcp://chipspool.cloud:5555 ( Auto VarDiff from 32 to 512 ) Medium Rigs
stratum+tcp://chipspool.cloud:6666 ( Auto VarDiff from 512 to 65536 ) Large Rigs


Cheers
http://miningpools.cloud

[ComputerGenie]

Code:

./bitcoin-qt
nonce.9250234
0000006e75f6aa0efdbf7db03132aa4e4d0c84951537a6f5a7c39a0a9d30e1e7 <- genesis
9bd1c477af8993947cdd9052c0e4c287fda95987b3cc8934b3769d7503852715 <- merkle
nonce.9250234
0000006e75f6aa0efdbf7db03132aa4e4d0c84951537a6f5a7c39a0a9d30e1e7 <- genesis
9bd1c477af8993947cdd9052c0e4c287fda95987b3cc8934b3769d7503852715 <- merkle
bitcoin-qt: chainparams.cpp:238: CTestNetParams::CTestNetParams(): Assertion `consensus.hashGenesisBlock == uint256S("0x000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943")' failed.
Aborted

[jl777B]

Code:

./bitcoin-qt
nonce.9250234
0000006e75f6aa0efdbf7db03132aa4e4d0c84951537a6f5a7c39a0a9d30e1e7 <- genesis
9bd1c477af8993947cdd9052c0e4c287fda95987b3cc8934b3769d7503852715 <- merkle
nonce.9250234
0000006e75f6aa0efdbf7db03132aa4e4d0c84951537a6f5a7c39a0a9d30e1e7 <- genesis
9bd1c477af8993947cdd9052c0e4c287fda95987b3cc8934b3769d7503852715 <- merkle
bitcoin-qt: chainparams.cpp:238: CTestNetParams::CTestNetParams(): Assertion `consensus.hashGenesisBlock == uint256S("0x000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943")' failed.
Aborted

seems you built/ran it for testnet
CHIPS is on mainnet

[ComputerGenie]

seems you built/ran it for testnet
...

I can't see how.

Used my boilerplate conf:

Code:

server=1
staking=0
rpcuser=MyUser
rpcpassword=MyPass
port=57777
rpcport=7777
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcallowip=192.168.1.8
daemon=1
gen=0
listen=1
algo=sha256d
maxconnections=25

Built it with:

   ./autogen.sh
   ./configure
   make

The daemon seems to work fine with that exact same conf and runs on main as expected:

Code:

./chips-cli getmininginfo
{
  "blocks": 201353,
  "currentblocksize": 1000,
  "currentblockweight": 4000,
  "currentblocktx": 0,
  "difficulty": 16592391.91971629,
  "errors": "This is a pre-release test build - use at your own risk - do not use for mining or merchant applications",
  "networkhashps": 5403234843940766,
  "pooledtx": 0,
  "chain": "main"
}

[jl777B]

seems you built/ran it for testnet
...

I can't see how.

Used my boilerplate conf:

Code:

server=1
staking=0
rpcuser=MyUser
rpcpassword=MyPass
port=57777
rpcport=7777
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcallowip=192.168.1.8
daemon=1
gen=0
listen=1
algo=sha256d
maxconnections=25

Built it with:

   ./autogen.sh
   ./configure
   make

The daemon seems to work fine with that exact same conf and runs on main as expected:

Code:

./chips-cli getmininginfo
{
  "blocks": 201353,
  "currentblocksize": 1000,
  "currentblockweight": 4000,
  "currentblocktx": 0,
  "difficulty": 16592391.91971629,
  "errors": "This is a pre-release test build - use at your own risk - do not use for mining or merchant applications",
  "networkhashps": 5403234843940766,
  "pooledtx": 0,
  "chain": "main"
}

bitcoin-qt: chainparams.cpp:238: CTestNetParams::CTestNetParams(): Assertion `consensus.hashGenesisBlock == uint256S("0x000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943")' failed.

it is checking against CTestNetParams, that is why i said you built/ran it for testnet somehow. not sure the details as I havent built the QT wallet, it could be I messed up the makefile for it?