Satoshi
NakaomotOuch.
Other than that, the article is awesome!
Meh. It's a positive article, which is always welcome in a world of "assault rifles stuffed with heroin" stories about
BTC.
However, I found the article irritating for at least two reasons. The first is that it reinforces the "not ready for grandma" meme. Ageism is rampant in the
BTC community, and, in my opinion, it leads one into making errors of judgment. I've mentioned here from time to time that I have teenage grandchildren, and I've used and mined
BTC since 2011 - it's no big deal. No age demographic is homogeneous in its skills, attitudes or behaviors.
A second irritant for me is the reinforcement of the "
BTC must be regulated" meme. I hold the view that "peer to peer" and "regulated" are incompatible notions. By all means regulate the fiat systems - they are regulators' property to manipulate, but once inside the world of
BTC all transactions must be peer to peer - otherwise it's just another regulators' tool, and regulation is "fiat" (let it be so) by definition.