frejo
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
June 27, 2013, 11:21:56 AM |
|
Nice work =) Can't wait to get my chips onto one of those units.
|
|
|
|
regular
|
|
June 28, 2013, 01:32:19 AM |
|
I would like to get 1 or 2 units as well if you still have any remaining. I would require the fully assembled unit with chips though.
|
|
|
|
strombom (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
June 29, 2013, 01:28:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
GandalfG
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
Dig your freedom
|
|
June 29, 2013, 04:08:25 AM |
|
390MHz ! very nice. Now I wait for shipping
|
Want to say thanks? 16ragydppe9QFRVhrdwEUjgfMS7KCfEFGY
|
|
|
bitrocket
|
|
June 29, 2013, 05:14:29 PM |
|
Hi Strombom, id like to order a unit, please check your PM
thx!
|
NEW Rocketpool Giveaway [POOL][DOGE] 10,000 Doge Block Finder Bonus on now: http://doge.rocketpool.org>50,000 Dogecoin bounty in blockfinder rewards
|
|
|
thorvald
|
|
July 02, 2013, 12:16:38 PM |
|
can you add the .bin file if you made some modifications to it I don`t know why but it it the only one that works on my board Regards Thor
|
|
|
|
strombom (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
July 02, 2013, 12:18:13 PM |
|
I don't understand, what should I add? Here is the info I provided:
|
|
|
|
thorvald
|
|
July 02, 2013, 12:45:12 PM |
|
hi , I`ve used your .bin 519b , it seems that for my fpga controller unit is the only one that works with any other bin Image higher then 519 I have 0 hash . my question was if you make modification to your bin image , can you please add it also to the download maybe there is something different in your build (that works with my controller v1.2) Regards Thor
|
|
|
|
strombom (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
July 02, 2013, 12:47:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
asically
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2013, 01:51:22 PM |
|
TLDR 390MHz ! very nice. Now I wait for shipping If ten chips then how comes 390MHz?
|
|
|
|
weaknesswaran
|
|
July 02, 2013, 01:54:40 PM |
|
TLDR 390MHz ! very nice. Now I wait for shipping If ten chips then how comes 390MHz? The chips are at 390MHz thats 3900MH/s for 10 chips The chips do one hash each cycle
|
|
|
|
silverserpent
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
July 07, 2013, 10:43:18 AM Last edit: July 07, 2013, 12:09:26 PM by silverserpent |
|
very impressive, Strombom! any updates on the chips shipping status/arrival date? I am still interested in the modules, maybe even a clone (waiting on price?) please advise on payment procedure too
thanks and congrats on all the progress
|
|
|
|
strombom (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
July 07, 2013, 04:23:31 PM |
|
I have sold all units in my first batch now. I'm currently producing a second batch, but only for a few bulk customers that do the assembly themselves. If someone is willing to assemble chips I can provide all required components... Unfortunately I don't have enough time to assemble more chips than for the units I have already sold. I don't know when the chips will arrive, like everyone else I'm waiting and hope they arrive soon...
|
|
|
|
GandalfG
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
Dig your freedom
|
|
July 08, 2013, 01:04:31 PM |
|
strombom, what type of jtag programmer You use ?
|
Want to say thanks? 16ragydppe9QFRVhrdwEUjgfMS7KCfEFGY
|
|
|
strombom (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
July 08, 2013, 01:11:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
BenTuras
|
|
July 08, 2013, 01:36:17 PM |
|
Out of curiosity, why is cgminer reporting MinerCount 24, while you seem to only have two boards connected ? MinerCount should be 2 ?!
|
|
|
|
cryptograd
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 08, 2013, 03:59:27 PM |
|
These are horrible numbers you are currently generating 48% hardware errors. What made you think 390mhz was stable on your current design?
|
|
|
|
BenTuras
|
|
July 08, 2013, 06:50:20 PM |
|
These are horrible numbers you are currently generating 48% hardware errors. What made you think 390mhz was stable on your current design? HW% = 100 * HW / (diff1shares + HW) 100 * 294 / (922 + 294) -> 24% Still not good tho, should be less than 2%. Must be because of high freq of 390! What HW% do you get at 300Mhz ?
|
|
|
|
GandalfG
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
Dig your freedom
|
|
July 08, 2013, 06:54:22 PM |
|
2013-06-29: I was supposed to have done this yesterday but now I have tested a full board with 10 chips. It seems to work well, running both modules at 390MHz for a few minutes is a good sign. These are horrible numbers you are currently generating 48% hardware errors. What made you think 390mhz was stable on your current design? This happens for several reasons: PCB not does not fit exactly to heatsink, no screws. To hot. Heatsink is not cooled, the lack of air flow. Efficiency of the inverter circuit can be reduced, coil used different from original Avalon.
|
Want to say thanks? 16ragydppe9QFRVhrdwEUjgfMS7KCfEFGY
|
|
|
cryptograd
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
July 08, 2013, 07:14:11 PM |
|
These are horrible numbers you are currently generating 48% hardware errors. What made you think 390mhz was stable on your current design? HW% = 100 * HW / (diff1shares + HW) 100 * 294 / (922 + 294) -> 24% Still not good tho, should be less than 2%. Must be because of high freq of 390! What HW% do you get at 300Mhz ? I base my number on a direct ratio between accepted and HW errors. This is beyond just not good. This is a travesty. Might as well attempt to mine with a GPU with those numbers
|
|
|
|
|