jackjack (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1257
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2013, 04:53:33 PM |
|
This block came 19 minutes 28 seconds after the previous one, and the miner didn't include any transaction Bastard ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2 Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
|
|
|
candoo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2013, 05:15:37 PM |
|
Sorry, my fault!
|
Einer trage des andern Last, so werdet ihr das Gesetz Christi erfüllen.
|
|
|
TalkingAntColony
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2013, 06:29:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 22, 2013, 12:16:13 PM |
|
Sorry, my fault!
mr. t has pity
|
|
|
|
akabmikua
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 22, 2013, 04:12:55 PM |
|
I think, that guy would have a pretty massive hashing power! But this much is next to impossible!
|
|
|
|
grue
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1434
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 22, 2013, 04:56:12 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 22, 2013, 05:06:51 PM |
|
That address belongs to a pool/entity/something called 'Eclipse' according to a search on the forums.
|
BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
|
|
|
scintill
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 06:43:29 AM |
|
That address belongs to a pool/entity/something called 'Eclipse' according to a search on the forums.
Yep, Eclipse Mining Consortium.
|
1SCiN5kqkAbxxwesKMsH9GvyWnWP5YK2W | donations
|
|
|
jdbtracker
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 12:56:12 PM |
|
hmmm they either made a typo or they are not sending just currency... I bet you it's porn.
|
If you think my efforts are worth something; I'll keep on keeping on. I don't believe in IQ, only in Determination.
|
|
|
Shevek
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 05:28:57 PM |
|
Why the other nodes accepted the block!? I think nodes/miners can have the power to reject such blocks that bother the whole system.
Bitcoin is about transactions. So, no transaction, no subsidy.
|
Proposals for improving bitcoin are like asses: everybody has one 1SheveKuPHpzpLqSvPSavik9wnC51voBa
|
|
|
leijurv
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
Vires in Numeris
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 05:33:18 PM |
|
I think nodes/miners can have the power to reject such blocks that bother the whole system.
+1
|
Firstbits 1Leijurv. Or, if you like cats, Firstbits 1Kittens and 1catcat as well. If you're a chemist, also 1Helium, 1Erbium, 1Copper, 1Cerium, and 1Nickel. If you like numbers, 123four, 12234, 12three. Keybase and onename user: leijurv.
|
|
|
jackjack (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1257
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 06:12:06 PM |
|
Why the other nodes accepted the block!? I think nodes/miners can have the power to reject such blocks that bother the whole system.
Bitcoin is about transactions. So, no transaction, no subsidy.
Another +1 A new block with less than 50% of your transactions pool? Block rejected Direct proof of your signature btw
|
Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2 Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
|
|
|
Shevek
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 06:36:01 PM |
|
Direct proof of your signature btw
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Well, in fact I don't stand for specific improve. I think, miners / nodes can reject such blocks within the actual protocol rules.
|
Proposals for improving bitcoin are like asses: everybody has one 1SheveKuPHpzpLqSvPSavik9wnC51voBa
|
|
|
|