-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2011, 05:09:41 AM |
|
Try decreasing --queue to 1 if you start getting more rejects. I'm not sure 2 is better than 1. More testing needed.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Naven
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2011, 05:33:16 AM |
|
Why it is impossible to mine now without supported gpu?
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2011, 11:47:39 AM |
|
Updated tree:
I've fixed a logic error in the queuing of extra work that would generate more rejects. No new windows binary as yet, sorry.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
burp
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2011, 12:53:45 PM Last edit: July 02, 2011, 01:12:28 PM by burp |
|
Best results ever, you are surpassing poclbm now ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I have a hard time getting rejected shares now ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) [2011-07-02 14:52:59] [619.41 | 617.64 Mhash/s | eff.: 626.28 Mhash/s] [296 Accepted] [0 Rejected] [0 HW errors] eff is accepted * 2^32 / (total_time * 1E6) EDIT: Somehow mining stopped after ca. 400 blocks, I will try again (but it ran with 0 rejected shares!).
|
|
|
|
ulee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2011, 01:20:11 PM |
|
If I use minerd on two different GPU's (5830+5770), the second one always produces 100% HW-Errors. This doesn't happen with other mining software.
EDIT: No, not always, can't reproduce it reliably.
|
|
|
|
ulee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2011, 01:30:29 PM |
|
Updated tree:
Attribute correct GPU for accepted/rejected shares. [...]
This doesn't work for me, shares from both GPU's show up with "GPU: 0" at the beginning of the line.
|
|
|
|
dc740
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2011, 02:43:07 PM |
|
Tried setting 1 gpu thread and 1 cpu thread and got a segmentation fault: Works: ./minerd --gpu-threads 2 --url --pass --user Segmentation fault: ./minerd -a sse2_64 -t 1 --gpu-threads 1 --url --pass --user [2011-07-02 11:37:12] Init GPU thread 0 [2011-07-02 11:37:12] List of devices: [2011-07-02 11:37:12] 0 GeForce 8600 GT [2011-07-02 11:37:12] Selected 0: GeForce 8600 GT [2011-07-02 11:37:23] Initialising kernel poclbm.cl without BFI_INT patching, 1 vectors and worksize 512 [2011-07-02 11:37:32] initCl() finished. Found GeForce 8600 GT [2011-07-02 11:37:32] 1 gpu miner threads started [2011-07-02 11:37:32] 1 cpu miner threads started, using SHA256 'sse2_64' algorithm. [2011-07-02 11:37:34] Long-polling activated for http://pit.deepbit.net:8332/listenChannel *** glibc detected *** ./minerd: corrupted double-linked list: 0x00007f8bb4586020 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x76bb6)[0x7f8bbf21fbb6] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x7a931)[0x7f8bbf223931] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x7b112)[0x7f8bbf224112] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(realloc+0xf9)[0x7f8bbf225b19] ./minerd[0x420610] ./minerd[0x41f44d] ./minerd[0x41fd5e] ./minerd[0x41fd69] ./minerd[0x42013e] ./minerd[0x405fd5] ./minerd[0x403229] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x6d8c)[0x7f8bbf748d8c] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f8bbf28f04d] BTW... the help lists -g as a valid option to set gpu threads, but if you use -g 1 it says it's invalid.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2011, 02:44:58 PM |
|
Sorry for some reason short options and invalid options are broken at the moment. Please use the long option names.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
burp
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2011, 10:21:16 AM Last edit: July 03, 2011, 10:35:35 AM by burp |
|
OK, I can confirm my previous result that somehow mining for one or multiple GPUs just stops. There is no indication of a crash, and no overheating possible. I can just restart minerd for normal operation. [2011-07-03 12:18:58] [310.07 | 391.56 Mhash/s | eff.: 385.04 Mhash/s] [4016 Accepted] [3 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:11:53] GPU: 0 Accepted: 830 Rejected: 2 HW errors: 0 [2011-07-03 03:11:56] [618.30 | 617.98 Mhash/s | eff.: 582.11 Mhash/s] [1623 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:01] [619.46 | 617.98 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.87 Mhash/s] [1623 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:03] GPU: 0 Accepted: 831 Rejected: 2 HW errors: 0 [2011-07-03 03:12:06] [617.86 | 617.98 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.98 Mhash/s] [1624 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:07] GPU: 1 Accepted: 794 Rejected: 0 HW errors: 0 [2011-07-03 03:12:12] [435.91 | 617.85 Mhash/s | eff.: 582.07 Mhash/s] [1625 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:17] [390.26 | 617.72 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.82 Mhash/s] [1625 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:22] GPU: 1 Accepted: 795 Rejected: 0 HW errors: 0 [2011-07-03 03:12:22] [346.60 | 617.58 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.93 Mhash/s] [1626 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:27] [329.83 | 617.46 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.69 Mhash/s] [1626 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:32] [318.97 | 617.33 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.45 Mhash/s] [1626 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:34] GPU: 1 Accepted: 796 Rejected: 0 HW errors: 0 [2011-07-03 03:12:37] [313.34 | 617.20 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.56 Mhash/s] [1627 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:42] [308.59 | 617.07 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.32 Mhash/s] [1627 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:47] [309.94 | 616.94 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.07 Mhash/s] [1627 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:52] GPU: 1 Accepted: 797 Rejected: 0 HW errors: 0 [2011-07-03 03:12:52] [309.93 | 616.81 Mhash/s | eff.: 581.19 Mhash/s] [1628 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:12:57] [309.95 | 616.68 Mhash/s | eff.: 580.94 Mhash/s] [1628 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors] [2011-07-03 03:13:03] [306.25 | 616.55 Mhash/s | eff.: 580.70 Mhash/s] [1628 Accepted] [2 Rejected] [0 HW errors]
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2011, 10:28:47 AM |
|
Yeah thanks. There is likely a logic error in the queueing of extra requests. I'm currently completely rewriting all that to preemptively request work before it's needed to help cope with dodgy network connectivity and other goodies. Actually it's complete but I'm testing it before pushing it.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2011, 03:15:43 PM |
|
Updated tree and windows binary: After an extensive period of poor connectivity with my pool I decided to make minerd much more robust with respect to networking and caching of work items. I modified to code to find when a worker thread is 2/3 of the way through completing that search and will then queue a new work request in advance at that point. This allows getting work over slow or intermittent connections asynchronously from the worker thread without having to have a large buffer of increasingly stale work. Then I added code to flush out all the old items of work when a longpoll is detected -and- queue a whole new set of work for each and every thread in advance since they'll all need new work. I've also updated the cpumining code to properly work to the end of a work item (and not be counted as inefficient mining), and made some of the log updates more robust. Minerd should cope better with spotty connections under periods of server stress now, and rejects across longpolls should be rarer. New windows binary: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cpuminer-ycros-2011-07-04.zipKnown bugs: It does not work with short options (only --long time options), and will crash with invalid options. Sometimes there's a crash deep within libcurl that looks like this: *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame *** This happens deep within the libcurl code and appears to be not related to minerd at all. The only thing it seems I can do about it is move to a different library. This is the only recurring problem and because of it I put minerd to auto-restart for myself though it's quite rare (sometimes happens immediately on starting on windows).
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Tartarus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2011, 05:22:12 PM |
|
With 17faaea and a local network interrupt (I think anyhow, VoIP call hung-up, ssh/etc stuff recovered fine) minerd stopped getting new work or doing anything else on the network for at least 5 minutes (then I ^C'd it). Retry was the default value.
|
|
|
|
ulee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2011, 05:22:46 PM |
|
I tried this ↑ new version of minerd, but I still get 100% HW-Errors on my second GPU. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) This bug doesn't occur with an old Version of minerd.
|
|
|
|
jgarzik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1099
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2011, 05:29:14 PM |
|
Can you change the name to something other than the now-misleading "cpuminer"?
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2011, 11:05:48 PM |
|
I tried this ↑ new version of minerd, but I still get 100% HW-Errors on my second GPU. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) This bug doesn't occur with an old Version of minerd. What does the output look like with -D until it has started getting HW errors?
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
ulee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 03, 2011, 11:58:56 PM |
|
What does the output look like with -D until it has started getting HW errors?
Output from minerdI didn't set --queue, --gpu-threads or --intensity, so these were at default values. These lines look interesting: [2011-07-04 01:42:48] GPU 1 found something? [2011-07-04 01:42:48] No best_g found! Error in OpenCL code? This only happens with the last few versions of of minerd, an older version (before your "What next..." post) worked fine with both GPUs. Unfortunately I don't know at which exact version it stopped working.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 04, 2011, 12:53:51 AM |
|
What does the output look like with -D until it has started getting HW errors?
Output from minerdI didn't set --queue, --gpu-threads or --intensity, so these were at default values. These lines look interesting: [2011-07-04 01:42:48] GPU 1 found something? [2011-07-04 01:42:48] No best_g found! Error in OpenCL code? This only happens with the last few versions of of minerd, an older version (before your "What next..." post) worked fine with both GPUs. Unfortunately I don't know at which exact version it stopped working. Thanks. I'm pretty sure I know what that is. The different cards need different kernels and they're both loading the same binary. I'll get to fixing that.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 04, 2011, 01:06:56 AM |
|
Can you change the name to something other than the now-misleading "cpuminer"? I'll get around to it sooner or later. Trying to consolidate everything now to make sure it's all actually working :s
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 04, 2011, 03:51:47 AM |
|
Thanks. I'm pretty sure I know what that is. The different cards need different kernels and they're both loading the same binary. I'll get to fixing that.
Updated tree: The binary kernel stored now includes the GPU name in the filename. This will allow separate binary kernels to be saved for each unique GPU type on the same machine which should fix this problem.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 04, 2011, 05:37:53 AM |
|
Updated tree:
I put a careful counter on the number of queued items to ensure we don't fall between the cracks during an updated block and clearing of work that we end up without any work and one ore more threads idle. Also, since minerd now pre-queues work before the previous work is finished, there is no need to have extra queued work by default, so I've changed the default queue value to 0 and made it mean extra queued work instead.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
|