More successfully prepared coins, going to more serious exchanges had setbacks due to trivialities. And here wallet without a user-friendly interface, the prospects for development are very vague. Miners, one and a half disabled.
Or the developer, decided to go to the stock exchange and merge on the first pampa ??
do not apologize for Google translator
All the best for translation for what we write here:
You assumption that we will look for better exchange without a good wallet and stable progress is wrong.
We are here to stay, so we believe in steady steps rather then go exchange and make money, you have so many optional coins popping everyday, you might like those.
We have over 300 different miners on our pools, which means Sikka is already with more then 300 people, which is large considering state of the project.
It is difficult and long process to build eco system and community.
Rather then focusing on exchange we are waiting for more contributors to join and grow the project.
We have asked community to test wordpress plugin, none turned up.
We have asked your suggestion for whitepaper, none received.
You expect coin to grow on its own, is a myth, we are not a ICO that raised money and original team will only do. We encouraged and rewarded those who came forward and we will keep doing so as long as we can.
We again ask people to step up and contribute towards growth of this coin.
somehow we feel satoshi's decision to go away was right, otherwise people would have expected him to do anything with BTC. I think still people lack meaning of decentralization and open source development.
May be once we float more details about future and what uniqueness we bring to crypto, more people will associate.
