|
|
|
cebonl
|
 |
October 20, 2017, 11:43:46 PM |
|
"devv still no answer to my question ?? how are you doing with yobit? my coins are stuck there ??"
Please read the blog on our website. its states you will be fine.
SORRY DEV IT IS MY ERROR I have filled out the form on the site and sent it. I hope it's okay, despite the problem of yobit |
|
|
|
|
complexring
Member
 Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2017, 01:06:11 AM |
|
naw ... there was a different one that actually seemed work properly before the site went down (maybe it's back up). https://imgur.com/a/oigzo |
|
|
|
|
|
m3rt1x
|
|
October 21, 2017, 04:43:06 AM |
|
Thank you Raetsch for this.This is the screenshot of the real block explorer! It shows the real rich list.And the rich list shows an absolutely healthy coin.All rich lists of legit coins actually look like this. |
|
|
|
|
raetsch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
|
|
October 21, 2017, 09:18:34 AM |
|
naw ... there was a different one that actually seemed work properly before the site went down (maybe it's back up). https://imgur.com/a/oigzoit works properly and is manipulated in mongodb i guess. i am not an expert and it took me 60h to get iquidus running, BECAUSE 950k blocks syncing in wallet and indexed be explorer script needs 59h on a lowend vm. look at the fake top wallet and look at my screenshot and the amount top1-25. the numbers somewhat correlate. that is why the fake explorer has more than 100% coins  |
|
|
|
|
|
m3rt1x
|
|
October 21, 2017, 01:43:47 PM |
|
naw ... there was a different one that actually seemed work properly before the site went down (maybe it's back up). https://imgur.com/a/oigzothe block explorer connie posted was manipulated.not believing it shows that you didn't have many coins.because if the original dev had 46 million coins,then there would only be left a little bit more than 11mil for the rest of us.all of us.and this is not possible because I know more than 3 guys that had and still have way more than 11 million coins in their desktop wallets. connie paid aalborg and some other dude to make a fake/manipulated block explorer as an excuse for connie to bail out and put the blame on the original dev.it was a smooth way out.well played if you ask me.end of story. |
|
|
|
|
complexring
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
October 21, 2017, 03:05:18 PM |
|
naw ... there was a different one that actually seemed work properly before the site went down (maybe it's back up). https://imgur.com/a/oigzothe block explorer connie posted was manipulated.not believing it shows that you didn't have many coins.because if the original dev had 46 million coins,then there would only be left a little bit more than 11mil for the rest of us.all of us.and this is not possible because I know more than 3 guys that had and still have way more than 11 million coins in their desktop wallets. connie paid aalborg and some other dude to make a fake/manipulated block explorer as an excuse for connie to bail out and put the blame on the original dev.it was a smooth way out.well played if you ask me.end of story. Awesome. Well, then it remains for the "team" to provide a working block explorer that was not manipulated to prove their claims. |
|
|
|
|
1MExpodingSuns
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
October 21, 2017, 03:42:19 PM |
|
As if they know how.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m3rt1x
|
|
October 22, 2017, 07:57:21 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kaltun
|
|
October 22, 2017, 02:16:05 PM |
|
from the beginning when this coin came out i was an supporter of this coin , it was very fast coin and it gave nice stake and the dev was very active in the beginning he was also busy with developping some api/app for yobit but this is/was abondoned by the dev ( dont know why) , months was dev active yobit, He tried to let the coin in his worth ,there were many dumps still it didnt fall very below ( at that time dev was active and the price was between 40 and 60 sats) .... but the dev abondomed thic thread because all this fudding and everytime tried the dev defend his coin , i think he get tired of this so he let his coin down ..... I occasionally saw him on yobit .... the coin did get lower i think lowest were 7 or 8 , i was sure this coin was dead ..... i find it pity for my efforts and btc i spend for this coin...... but then out of nowhere came others with it idea to take over this coin and making an MN of it ... and then i saw the price rising again ... eventually it hit 269sats....... i liked the idea , but ive got question marks when they announced they gonna swap the coins for an eth assets  ? ( huh sinds when can you make an asset as an MN)....?? i didnt mind they changed the MN coins from 100k to 150K ( i allready had 170K ) . after a good think , i didnt trust it anymore , to much uncertainties came above , and the price was nice ( bought them at 50 sats ) and could not resist and sold them at 150sat ( if i had knew that the price went higher , i would waited  ) , and thought when its swapped and the masternode is an succes , i will rebuy it .... but when is this developments and people get scammed , its not nice .... my 2 cents ps : i still like cwxt coin .... if its arise from his dead i will buy it again.... |
|
|
|
|
Goodmens
Member
Offline
Activity: 170
Merit: 39
|
|
October 22, 2017, 02:20:31 PM |
|
They are real. I've spoken to the CEO. Please stop spreading fud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kaltun
|
|
October 22, 2017, 02:24:06 PM |
|
They are real. I've spoken to the CEO. Please stop spreading fud.
wow , how nice an newbie ( who registered today) spoke to them , how nice of you ....?? but WHO ARE YOU ? , if you man enough dont use your newbie account but use your higher account and tel us again please , who you spoke , when you spoke and why are they not replying here ??........ |
|
|
|
|
tokenzzz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
October 22, 2017, 10:12:19 PM |
|
I think maybe you have problem with 2 gangs, but who owns what? CWXT, CWX? Original development is not in development, now, so 2nd gang is the real development? It is not clear to me, and people said it would be a swap on Novaexchange, but what is swapped? Who is in charge, not the original man, so it must be the other gang you do not like. I can see original code is on Github.com, but where is new code? Also original code is SHA256D, it is not so modern, and like any coin clone. So you make me think that you are just ready to be here to say bad things about gang 2 or why say to people it was a great code and fast, if it is just copied? Maybe you bring the original man back, and he can work with the new people and everyone is happy? It is not so hard if you want the best. Original man who made the CWXT is only quiet, so maybe this means he is happy anyway or maybe he is just good to not get in fights with people. I do not believe much from this bitcointalk discussion and the other one is not much better. You just seem to hate each other. Try to work together or abandon project because it is not going to work with all the hate you have. |
|
|
|
|
complexring
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
October 22, 2017, 11:04:55 PM
Last edit: October 23, 2017, 02:27:00 PM by complexring |
|
I think maybe you have problem with 2 gangs, but who owns what? CWXT, CWX? Original development is not in development, now, so 2nd gang is the real development? It is not clear to me, and people said it would be a swap on Novaexchange, but what is swapped? Who is in charge, not the original man, so it must be the other gang you do not like. I can see original code is on Github.com, but where is new code? Also original code is SHA256D, it is not so modern, and like any coin clone. So you make me think that you are just ready to be here to say bad things about gang 2 or why say to people it was a great code and fast, if it is just copied? Maybe you bring the original man back, and he can work with the new people and everyone is happy? It is not so hard if you want the best. Original man who made the CWXT is only quiet, so maybe this means he is happy anyway or maybe he is just good to not get in fights with people. I do not believe much from this bitcointalk discussion and the other one is not much better. You just seem to hate each other. Try to work together or abandon project because it is not going to work with all the hate you have. How this was initially pitched was that the devs were going to do a 3:1 swap of the CWXT chain to masternodes. Then, they linked to a (manipulated) block explorer and said they were not wanting to do a swap because the amount of coins in the original dev's address was too high. The new team has even gone so far as to state that they never planned on having actual masternodes, but that they would have masternode-like features on the Ethereum blockchain -- token ticker CWX. This is contrary to numerous statements made in the past and even this paid for press-release : https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/crypto-world-x-masternodes-taking/In order to save face, they want to collect your personal information in order to "give" everyone in the community 35000 CWX. This is in addition to running their scammy ICO. Anyway, it's clear that they lack the simple understanding of the economic incentive structure as to why someone would actually run masternodes and be rewarded in the underlying coin to do so, i.e. providing network security and being compensated in the network's base currency. What's not to understand? Inflation for doing nothing for the network makes no sense economically. On the other hand, inflation through rewards for providing services to increase the value of a network makes sense. There's your Economics 101 lesson for the day folks. I suggest you read Chapters 2, 4, and 5 and answer the first 10 questions in Chapters 3 and 7 for homework. These topics will be on the final.  |
|
|
|
|
|
dellzxd
|
|
October 23, 2017, 01:46:09 PM |
|
so what will be ? nothing will happen ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anatoliyb50
|
|
October 23, 2017, 08:14:40 PM |
|
Read all the forum posts, but did not understand what the coin was waiting for ?! But still filled out the form on the site ...  |
|
|
|
|
tokenzzz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 11:06:13 PM |
|
I think maybe you have problem with 2 gangs, but who owns what? CWXT, CWX? Original development is not in development, now, so 2nd gang is the real development? It is not clear to me, and people said it would be a swap on Novaexchange, but what is swapped? Who is in charge, not the original man, so it must be the other gang you do not like. I can see original code is on Github.com, but where is new code? Also original code is SHA256D, it is not so modern, and like any coin clone. So you make me think that you are just ready to be here to say bad things about gang 2 or why say to people it was a great code and fast, if it is just copied? Maybe you bring the original man back, and he can work with the new people and everyone is happy? It is not so hard if you want the best. Original man who made the CWXT is only quiet, so maybe this means he is happy anyway or maybe he is just good to not get in fights with people. I do not believe much from this bitcointalk discussion and the other one is not much better. You just seem to hate each other. Try to work together or abandon project because it is not going to work with all the hate you have. How this was initially pitched was that the devs were going to do a 3:1 swap of the CWXT chain to masternodes. Then, they linked to a (manipulated) block explorer and said they were not wanting to do a swap because the amount of coins in the original dev's address was too high. The new team has even gone so far as to state that they never planned on having actual masternodes, but that they would have masternode-like features on the Ethereum blockchain -- token ticker CWX. This is contrary to numerous statements made in the past and even this paid for press-release : https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/crypto-world-x-masternodes-taking/In order to save face, they want to collect your personal information in order to "give" everyone in the community 35000 CWX. This is in addition to running their scammy ICO. Anyway, it's clear that they lack the simple understanding of the economic incentive structure as to why someone would actually run masternodes and be rewarded in the underlying coin to do so, i.e. providing network security and being compensated in the network's base currency. What's not to understand? Inflation for doing nothing for the network makes no sense economically. On the other hand, inflation through rewards for providing services to increase the value of a network makes sense. There's your Economics 101 lesson for the day folks. I suggest you read Chapters 2, 4, and 5 and answer the first 10 questions in Chapters 3 and 7 for homework. These topics will be on the final. I think most clear is you belong to gang number 1. You make many points but even if some are true you only say statements. When they have Block Explorer, it says on the other bitcointalk thread there is an identical number of tokenz with Yobit, but both gangs say it is 47 million. I think when it is higher as yobit reports, yobit is not lying. I find no wallet links, so why? I make one for myself should I? You are telling people your funny joke on Economics 101 well the funny joke is you have a token without a wallet, you have more tokenz than is said and you do not even make Block Explorer, so how can you be a reliable person to take instruction from? You talk my friend, but say just nothing that is about important things. This is political speak without any intent to be open. "Blame them, they are bad, this was bad, you are stupid, here is economics 101". You are not of value except to make it worse and you do it on purpose. I make jokes all the time and I said in other discussion I will make CWXX, new honest and no ICO but premine for victims if possible, then I make some more jokes but they are not so important. You can not make this token work and do not care and gang two is saying things but quiet suddenly, maybe you bully them to submit., I think so. I can make this token I have been to Github.com to see code and wallet but found only code there. It is very easy token to make. Maybe I make number 3 version and then start to say look you are bad. If nobody is responsible for anything then why waste time here you produce nothing. If you still acting like a big crying baby in 1 week I will make number 3 on better code with better way to make it fair. You piss me off with your Economics 101, you are nothing. |
|
|
|
|
tokenzzz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 11:32:11 PM |
|
Ha, I see in the 10 pages some bad people I know of but as other people.
You use this bitcointalk discussion to try dis-credit number 2 version and bring in people with another accounts name to make yourself look.
I see you and I know what you are doing now. You are not so clever maybe go to school for naughty children 101 for a long time and then come back like good children.
most of discusion here is fake.
|
|
|
|
|
tokenzzz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
October 24, 2017, 02:09:00 AM |
|
I am thinking someone will say something, nobody says one thing.
Number 2 developer say something about your own bitcointalk discussion.
Number 1 team (developer is maybe not involved), do what I said to 2.
Or am I right thinking you are not 1 and 2, but 1, play game to excuse yourself from disaster.
Go play 101 being honest, and not children scammers team.
I take this token from you in next 2 weeks unless you move.
Why?
No ICO happen, but maybe tiny sells, all tokenz own by team 1, so team 1 make team 2, so we have trouble and blaming going to each team
But nobody care, as no investment ever made. DSo they make a show thinking they are so clever and everyone in this world is reading these discussions.
I say in Bitcointalk words, Scam.
The same people are being 1 and 2, and make show to try and show a big battle. No, it is lie.
Old trick. But bad actors and nobody care about shit coin anyway apart from yobit people who bought it at high price.
Lies.
Anyone want me to take this shit coin, I take it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
