Well it's a easy way to manipulate the market. Your tokens are 100% non mineable so no worrying about dumps from multipools and you get the benefit of 5% of the supply being in circulation but gaining the marketcap of 100% of the supply making their rankings on sites like
www.coinmarketcap.com over inflated. This to try gain attention of people thinking it's some great project.
This will imo kill off innovation when money is so easily made with just an idea and marketing.
Outside of bitcoin... ETH, Gulden and syscoin are the ones pushing blockchain innovation and these ICOs are beating these coins in rankings (Gulden and syscoin).
In the case of Gulden they have merchants being added daily in the Netherlands and still only ranking 90th.
I agree but there are many that are innovating.
I worry that easy access to cash is being exploited by many and since they get the money up front some (or most) no longer have the same motivation to go further.
I believe that tightening on ICO is a good thing. Besides, most of the time, ICO's are geared to benefit the wealthy anyway. I don't have $50,000 or $250,000 that most good ICO require. Based on my limited research, the ones that require less (and don't get sold out right away) are usually the bad ones. The poor usually get victimized.
JMHO