0.96.4 RC1

[Carsten83FFM]

It seems armory does not add the amount of the original UTXO (complete, so before subtracting fees) when signing the transaction. I fixed this in a small script: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2309673.0

[Brangdon]

I'm unable to set the preferred receive address type to P2SH-P2WPKH for my offline machine. I've just updated both my online and my offline to this release. My online, connected computer allows all the address types. The offline one has P2SH-P2WPKH disabled. Is there a reason for this?

PS I really think you should have a sticky post at the top of this forum pointing to https://btcarmory.com/docs/. I just tried searching ang got https://www.bitcoinarmory.com/ again. It's not clear which is the best site to use.

[goatpig]

https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/blob/testing/changelog.txt#L9

[Brangdon]

https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/blob/testing/changelog.txt#L9

Thanks. I'm surprised it needs a commandline option, given that SegWit is off by default.

Has Armory got slower to launch recently? I had it running and synced, closed it, then immediately restarted it. It's taken several minutes to build databases and now says an hour to scan transaction history. I'm sure it used to be much quicker just a few months ago.

[goatpig]

Thanks. I'm surprised it needs a commandline option, given that SegWit is off by default.

SegWit is off by default. Activation is detected by the node it is running against. Therefor an offline instance cannot detect SegWit activation, which is why you need to manually enable it.

Has Armory got slower to launch recently? I had it running and synced, closed it, then immediately restarted it. It's taken several minutes to build databases and now says an hour to scan transaction history. I'm sure it used to be much quicker just a few months ago.

Some event increased the address chain without registering the new addresses. On the next run, they have to be scanned.

[clarkcg7]

Is armory 0.96.4 RC1 the same as 0.96.3.99? I can't seem to find the download for 0.96.4 RC1. Sorry for the noob question.

[goatpig]

0.96.3.99 is 0.96.4 RC1

[Casimir1904]

An offline transactions with Input from Segwit addresses it not recognized by the signer.
Signer and online version are both on the 0.96.4 RC1 version

[goatpig]

There was a bug reported when using several SW inputs the process would choke. I'm working on it.

[Casimir1904]

There was a bug reported when using several SW inputs the process would choke. I'm working on it.

Exactly, I try to move inputs from an incoming wallet where lot inputs on different SW addresses comes in.
Guess have to use non segwit inputs then for now.

[goatpig]

If you're willing to build from the testing branch I could probably have this fixed today.

[Casimir1904]

If you're willing to build from the testing branch I could probably have this fixed today.

I can do that.

[goatpig]

Should be fixed, try it out.

[Casimir1904]

Should be fixed, try it out.

Nope, not working.
Does the signer need to be updated as well?

[goatpig]

Yes both the offline and online instance need the fix.

[Casimir1904]

Yes both the offline and online instance need the fix.

Ok build the signer as well but seems its still starting the old one or the version wasn't updated.
Have to figure out later, its not working with the new build but maybe somehow the old version is loaded so could be a problem on my side.

[goatpig]

I'll try with offline signing and let you know.

Edit: offline sign works too on my end. There is no version bump on the software, maybe you want to bootleg that to be sure you're running the right code:

https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/blob/master/armoryengine/ArmoryUtils.py#L71

[Casimir1904]

I'll try with offline signing and let you know.

Edit: offline sign works too on my end. There is no version bump on the software, maybe you want to bootleg that to be sure you're running the right code:

https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/blob/master/armoryengine/ArmoryUtils.py#L71

No luck for me so far. I'm back to an older version but currently rebuilding the DB.
Maybe its because I just have a lot inputs in such transactions.

[goatpig]

Maybe its because I just have a lot inputs in such transactions.

Shouldn't be related. If you're having errors, let me see the logs. The user who reported the issue confirmed the fix on his end, so you may be experiencing something different.

[Casimir1904]

Maybe its because I just have a lot inputs in such transactions.

Shouldn't be related. If you're having errors, let me see the logs. The user who reported the issue confirmed the fix on his end, so you may be experiencing something different.

Ok, but that would take some time... Can't just keep testing all the time as i usual need to make transactions.
Now i'm rebuilding the db with a old version, i can go back to newer version when i moved some coins after that.