do you think its good if whole world will have ICO regulations?

[anggriani]

I think the rules for ico are very unnecessary, I'm not sure if the rules made by the government can go well and correctly. Why? Because many opportunities can be misused by regulators or ico controllers.

[elbimbo012]

Yes it should be regulated to be fair in real IPO trading system. this will also protect investor from scammer. If it is not regulated many scammer developer would create coin over and over to raise fund and once they already get plenty of money they will abandon the project.

[CraigWrightBTC]

I don't think if the ICOs projects has regulations is something good because the regulations is for the traditional instrument of investment like IPO in stocks, we are in digital coins world, it is anonymous, decentralize and transparent.
The ICOs is new model fundings of businesses, they have uniqueness than others instrument of investment, the investors can be free to choose investment in the ICOs, no rules of bans from the government or other.

[danbitcoin1]

Yes, most ICOs are complete junk. People without even having a prototype raising 10s of millions of $s lol.

[NelfiNovita]

I think ICO should have rules because ICO is generally used as a fund raising of a company or project then at least the regulation should be set so that investors' investment is safer and of course it is also useful to save crypto from manipulation of people who are not responsible.

[saeyeen]

I think its okay and a good decision to have a regulations for ICO's because there are already a lot of scam ICO's that is popping so investors need to be protected.

[gribble]

some ICOs are seeking new ways to work around regulations in different countries, the regulations that deal with ICOs and other regulations dealing with distributed businesses. Below is a summary of three attempts to overcome regulation in a legal way, and how they might fare.
: Divide and conquer
: Buying your freedom
: SAFT
The explanation is here about  Three ways companies are working around regulation in the ICO and crypto space. https://t.co/7PKX56zHsH

[CoinSavvy]

Considering ICOs are decentralized and are mostly oriented to raise funds, there are no existing regulations, as far as I know.
Figuratively speaking, this coin has two sides. On the one hand, it could open new opportunities for crypto-community in general to apply the decentralized projects in reality, but on the other hand, regulations of any kind may have the adverse effect on the crypto-people. The whole point is in the fact that it doesn't require any regulations and works pretty much fine.

[honeyduckgoose]

It would completely depend on what regulations were implemented.

Regulations can either improve the overall level of the product / service, or just make it impossible to carry on.

I don't think there will ever be a world recognized regulation though, as some countries will take advantage of other countries regulating it. The world rarely comes together and agrees on legislation.

[Maveth13]

I think regulating ICOs is a good thing especially now that ICOs are popping out left and right. It would make it safer for investors to ensure that they won't be scammed. It would also be a way for people to have a general assessment wether a project is good or not. An ICO regulation should filter out possible good coins and shit coins.

[DanWalker]

Some kind of projects just need regulation! For examble BrickBlock or Swarm.Fund. They trying to interact with real assets market. It's can't be done without regulations. Moreover big money will come to the market of cryptocurrencies only when regulations will be.

[carrie_white]

I think that's a good thing, because if all ico been in the regulation, then the perpetrators of the scammers ico project will be in the comb. but this is still a lot of pros and cons of various parties, so it can not quickly be realized

[beerlover]

do you think its good if whole world will have ICO regulations?
do we want that?
why?
and what can be a solution for that?

It is best if you look at the positive side instead. I have never really liked regulation cause that is how most government has always been controlling everything. However, at this stage and the way some projects are using the ICO medium to scam, do we really have any choice ?

If they are not properly monitored, it is obvious things will get out of hand eventually and even put a negative tag on the crypto community.

All these are just as a result of lazy investors who don't do adequate diligence before just opting into a project and ends up getting scammed in the long run, only if everyone can be smart and be wise to know if a project could be a scam or not, some projects will not even make it past the pre-ico stage.

[senin]

I think it will be good if all states decide on the regulation of the ICO. However, the regulation itself should concern only the part that ensures the identification of the team that will conduct the ICO and regulate the transparency of this process. Regulation should not concern other ICO issues not related to security and collection of taxes.