Banning Butthurt People/ Trolls

[aTriz]

Hello, everyone, I've had some instances with a couple of new accounts, where they are spamming my campaign thread and also my personal thread. It is getting a bit annoying now since they are quoting OP, spamming the thread with insults and basically making life difficult. Is this to be considered trolling, and if that is a bannable offense
Accounts in question.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1193745

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1174000 (This one hasn't posted anything yet)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1173973

[1714094798]

1714094798

[1714094798]

1714094798

[hilariousandco]

Handling trolling will be taken on a case by case basis. Trizgayboy is proxy banned and I nuked the other two since they're obviously just throwaway troll accounts of butthurt shitposters who you rejected.

[Lauda]

Handling trolling will be taken on a case by case basis. Trizgayboy is proxy banned and I nuked the other two since they're obviously just throwaway troll accounts of butthurt shitposters who you rejected.

The forum should be doing that more often IMO. Allowing stuff like this is just damaging for everyone, the people who are being bullied, the users, the services and ultimately the forum (which is already in a bad state).

[aTriz]

Handling trolling will be taken on a case by case basis. Trizgayboy is proxy banned and I nuked the other two since they're obviously just throwaway troll accounts of butthurt shitposters who you rejected.

Thank you! I will keep pming you about any more cases of this, instead of making new threads, and thank you for deleting their posts.

[Moniro]

Handling trolling will be taken on a case by case basis. Trizgayboy is proxy banned and I nuked the other two since they're obviously just throwaway troll accounts of butthurt shitposters who you rejected.

The forum should be doing that more often IMO. Allowing stuff like this is just damaging for everyone, the people who are being bullied, the users, the services and ultimately the forum (which is already in a bad state).

@OP don't expect 'butthurt people/trolls' to get banned if you have full-blown criminals on this site who are not banned yet. The above poster (LAUDA) is a good example of people that continue to be here despite having been caught in illegal schemes: Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt . Given the fact that this is a serious crime, trolls are probably the least to worry about.

[aTriz]

Handling trolling will be taken on a case by case basis. Trizgayboy is proxy banned and I nuked the other two since they're obviously just throwaway troll accounts of butthurt shitposters who you rejected.

The forum should be doing that more often IMO. Allowing stuff like this is just damaging for everyone, the people who are being bullied, the users, the services and ultimately the forum (which is already in a bad state).

@OP don't expect 'butthurt people/trolls' to get banned if you have full-blown criminals on this site who are not banned yet. The above poster (LAUDA) is a good example of people that continue to be here despite having been caught in illegal schemes: Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt . Given the fact that this is a serious crime, trolls are probably the least to worry about.

You know your argument is over when you use quickseller to prove a point.

Nuff said.

[Moniro]

Handling trolling will be taken on a case by case basis. Trizgayboy is proxy banned and I nuked the other two since they're obviously just throwaway troll accounts of butthurt shitposters who you rejected.

The forum should be doing that more often IMO. Allowing stuff like this is just damaging for everyone, the people who are being bullied, the users, the services and ultimately the forum (which is already in a bad state).

@OP don't expect 'butthurt people/trolls' to get banned if you have full-blown criminals on this site who are not banned yet. The above poster (LAUDA) is a good example of people that continue to be here despite having been caught in illegal schemes: Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt . Given the fact that this is a serious crime, trolls are probably the least to worry about.

You know your argument is over when you use quickseller to prove a point.

Nuff said.

Your argument is invalid.

Just because person X posts about crime Y doesn't make crime Y any less severe. The extortion happened and it is illegal in both Austria (where Lauda lives now) as well as in Croatia (where he was born).  If/when convicted jail time is the consequence. Quickseller or any other scammer/defrauder posting about it doesn't change the hard facts in the slightest.

As mentioned bad cases of trolls are dealt with by the moderators of this forum and I have seen it happening efficiently. Scammers, however, are not banned.

[Lauda]

As mentioned bad cases of trolls are dealt with by the moderators of this forum and I have seen it happening efficiently.

Ironically, you prove this not to be the case given that you're a troll derailing this thread with fake information about something that isn't even relevant.

* Lauda takes a sip of Marsian wine.

You know your argument is over when you use quickseller to prove a point.

Nuff said.

When all you got left is the criminal card.

[aTriz]

Your argument is invalid.

Just because person X posts about crime Y doesn't make crime Y any less severe. The extortion happened and it is illegal in both Austria (where Lauda lives now) as well as in Croatia (where he was born).  If convicted jail time is the consequence.

To be honest, I think Lauda actually lives on Mars, wouldn't you agree Lauda?
That extortion attempt was blown heavily out of proportion by Quickseller and his legion of alt accounts.

Quickseller or any other scammer/defrauder posting about it doesn't change the hard facts in the slightest.

So you're admitting to a knowing that a known scammer reported someone? Doesn't that seem a bit incorrect to you?

Known scammer--- Reports trusted person---- Must be true!!!  
 
As it's said. It was blown out of proportion.

Now, just because person X negs you for being a deep onion shill, doesn't make the crime any less true.

[Moniro]

As mentioned bad cases of trolls are dealt with by the moderators of this forum and I have seen it happening efficiently.

Ironically, you prove this not to be the case given that you're a troll derailing this thread with fake information about something that isn't even relevant.

* Lauda takes a sip of Marsian wine.

Please refer me to false information.

I think Lauda actually lives on Mars, wouldn't you agree Lauda?

In light of facts it is not important what you think.

That extortion attempt was blown heavily out of proportion by Quickseller and his legion of alt accounts.

This is your personal opinion and not a fact.

So you're admitting to a knowing that a known scammer reported someone? Doesn't that seem a bit incorrect to you?

I do not fully understand your sentence. I was simply proving that your argument is invalid.

[Lauda]

Please refer me to false information.

If I were to tell you everything that was wrong, then you'd might actually get closer to finding out where I am but aTriz got it pretty much figured out. Then again, Mars is pretty big.

Quickseller or any other scammer/defrauder posting about it doesn't change the hard facts in the slightest.

So you're admitting to a knowing that a known scammer reported someone? Doesn't that seem a bit incorrect to you?

He/she/they don't care about a well known and chronic criminal such as Quickseller yet try to play the moral/legal card here. Obviously they have no standing ground whatsoever considering their absurd and outright pathetic bias. A type of concern trolling that isn't being banned, unfortunately.

[Moniro]

Please refer me to false information.

If I were to tell you everything that was wrong, then you'd might actually get closer to finding out where I am but aTriz got it pretty much figured out. Then again, Mars is pretty big.

This reply is completely worthless. First you claim that there is false information and immediately after you claim that you can not say what is false or what is true.

He/she/they don't care about a well known and chronic criminal such as Quickseller yet try to play the moral/legal card here. Obviously they have no standing ground whatsoever considering their absurd and outright pathetic bias.

As a known extortionist you sure have a big mouth. Have you not yet realized the very same applies to you?

[aTriz]

As mentioned bad cases of trolls are dealt with by the moderators of this forum and I have seen it happening efficiently.

Ironically, you prove this not to be the case given that you're a troll derailing this thread with fake information about something that isn't even relevant.

* Lauda takes a sip of Marsian wine.

Please refer me to false information.

I think Lauda actually lives on Mars, wouldn't you agree Lauda?

In light of facts it is not important what you think.

That extortion attempt was blown heavily out of proportion by Quickseller and his legion of alt accounts.

This is your personal opinion and not a fact.

So you're admitting to a knowing that a known scammer reported someone? Doesn't that seem a bit incorrect to you?

I do not fully understand your sentence. I was simply proving that your argument is invalid.

Honestly, mate if you're so mad about this  Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt, you might as well just go find a couple of lawyers and sue them. This fact your complaining on a forum about something about this just shows how it is completely false.

[Lauda]

This reply is completely worthless. First you claim that there is false information and immediately after you claim that you can not say what is false or what is true.

Why should or shouldn't I tell you anything for free? Maybe, someone else will pop up and claim they've been dealing with me. Try buying information from them (again).

He/she/they don't care about a well known and chronic criminal such as Quickseller yet try to play the moral/legal card here. Obviously they have no standing ground whatsoever considering their absurd and outright pathetic bias.

As a known extortionist you sure have a big mouth. Have you not yet realized the very same applies to you?

It doesn't even remotely apply to me. Learn the definition of chronic offender. Education doesn't seem to be one of your strong features.

Honestly, mate if you're so mad about this  Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt, you might as well just go find a couple of lawyers and sue them. This fact your complaining on a forum about something about this just shows how it is completely false.

Minifrij has absolutely nothing to do with it, and Quickseller still refuses to change that title. Even shorena stated that minifrij is not involved, and they're literally the only *legitimate* person standing on the wrong side with the criminal & his alts. Such a lying hypocrite, that Quickseller.

[botany]

Hello, everyone, I've had some instances with a couple of new accounts, where they are spamming my campaign thread and also my personal thread. It is getting a bit annoying now since they are quoting OP, spamming the thread with insults and basically making life difficult. Is this to be considered trolling, and if that is a bannable offense
Accounts in question.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1193745

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1174000 (This one hasn't posted anything yet)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1173973

Just create self-moderated threads (at least for your personal thread).
That would reduce clutter and take care of this problem as well.

[Moniro]

He/she/they don't care about a well known and chronic criminal such as Quickseller yet try to play the moral/legal card here. Obviously they have no standing ground whatsoever considering their absurd and outright pathetic bias.

As a known extortionist you sure have a big mouth. Have you not yet realized the very same applies to you?

It doesn't even remotely apply to me. Learn the definition of chronic offender. Education doesn't seem to be one of your strong features.

The point is that you are trying to play the 'moral/legal card' (as stated countlessly by yourself) despite being a known extortionist = criminal. Whether you are a chronic or habitual offender is of little importance. Comments like these do not help your case but make it worse.

Why should or shouldn't I tell you anything for free?

If you claim there is fake/false information it is your job to prove it wrong. Anything else is gibberish.

Honestly, mate if you're so mad about this  Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt, you might as well just go find a couple of lawyers and sue them. This fact your complaining on a forum about something about this just shows how it is completely false.

Thank you for this suggestion. Rest assured there are more than one persons working on preparing the lawsuit indeed.

[aTriz]

Thank you for this suggestion. Rest assured there are more than one persons working on preparing the lawsuit indeed.

You're a funny guy. I'll also invite Satoshi to come watch Lauda get arrested.

[maeusi]

I would urgently reccommend, also to delete this thread with proven false accusation.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2243173.0

[Lauda]

Whether you are a chronic or habitual offender is of little importance.

Stating that there's almost no difference between single time criminal offender and a chronic just shows your lack of education and your bullshit. Keep drinking the kool-aid, but that ain't gonna help you get a better degree than high school.

Thank you for this suggestion. Rest assured there are more than one persons working on preparing the lawsuit indeed.

You're a funny guy. I'll also invite Satoshi to come watch Lauda get arrested.

I would urgently reccommend, also to delete this thread with proven false accusation.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2243173.0

I take it that it has not been removed because so many people already replied to it.

[Moniro]

Whether you are a chronic or habitual offender is of little importance.

Stating that there's almost no difference between single time criminal offender and a chronic just shows your lack of education and your bullshit. Keep drinking the kool-aid, but that ain't gonna help you get a better degree than high school.

Classic argumentum ad hominem. Playing stupid on purpose, are we?

It is indeed of little importance whether you are a habitual or chronic criminal as the point is that you, 'LaudaM', are a proven extortionist (criminal). What sort of offender is important regarding your prosecution only, not regarding the issue or argument.