Lauda keeps giving negative trust

[ripplehd1]

It seems that this lauda is trying to stop me from becoming reputable on this forum and for what reason untrustworthy scam attempts im about to become a senior member and still i feel that this user is abusing the trust system. 

[1713926916]

1713926916

[1713926916]

1713926916

[1713926916]

1713926916

[Zepher]

Threads such as this, along with your previous one, really don't help your case. Do you really think that constantly pressuring someone to remove a rating is going to make them do it? If so you're very wrong.

[Lauda]

You continue doing shady stuff -> I continue leaving negative ratings. Simple as that.

[ripplehd1]

You continue doing shady stuff -> I continue leaving negative ratings. Simple as that.

Me being scammed is me being shady 

[Lauda]

You continue doing shady stuff -> I continue leaving negative ratings. Simple as that.

Me being scammed is me being shady  

Trading Bitcointalk accounts is shady. I'd even say that getting scammed in such a deal is well deserved, but some might whine that I'm too blunt.
The real intention behind you attempting to buy a new account is to avoid your current negative ratings, which itself deserves yet another rating.

[DarkArmy]

You continue doing shady stuff -> I continue leaving negative ratings. Simple as that.

Me being scammed is me being shady 

What's shady is this type of behaviour. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2269217.msg22999130#msg22999130 (post by you stating you'll only deal with DT 1 & DT 2)

Wanting to deal with only one type of user (one that's able to grant + trust  ) when you could choose to use escrow with any other user.

[Lauda]

What's shady is this type of behaviour. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2269217.msg22999130#msg22999130 (post by you stating you'll only deal with DT 1 & DT 2)

Wanting to deal with only one type of user (one that's able to grant + trust  ) when you could choose to use escrow with any other user.

If someone leaves him positive trust after me, I'll negate it with a fresh rating. Those kind of childish evasion games don't work with me. However, thank you for pointing that link out as I was not aware of it.

[ripplehd1]

What's shady is this type of behaviour. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2269217.msg22999130#msg22999130 (post by you stating you'll only deal with DT 1 & DT 2)

Wanting to deal with only one type of user (one that's able to grant + trust  ) when you could choose to use escrow with any other user.

If someone leaves him positive trust after me, I'll negate it with a fresh rating. Those kind of childish evasion games don't work with me. However, thank you for pointing that link out as I was not aware of it.

Why the hell are you abusing the system if i haven't scam no one then its pointless you doing that; look for someone else not me because i can 100% assure you that i won't scam. watch next year i will still have zero scam attempts meaning you negative ink was pointless. ill even prove it to you that i haven't scammed

[DarkArmy]

What's shady is this type of behaviour. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2269217.msg22999130#msg22999130 (post by you stating you'll only deal with DT 1 & DT 2)

Wanting to deal with only one type of user (one that's able to grant + trust  ) when you could choose to use escrow with any other user.

If someone leaves him positive trust after me, I'll negate it with a fresh rating. Those kind of childish evasion games don't work with me. However, thank you for pointing that link out as I was not aware of it.

Why the hell are you abusing the system if i haven't scam no one then its pointless you doing that; look for someone else not me because i can 100% assure you that i won't scam. watch next year i will still have zero scam attempts meaning you negative ink was pointless. ill even prove it to you that i haven't scammed

I'm sure if you prove your innocence within a year and email an active bloke in the forum involved in many legitimate trades not created for the sole purpose of trade farming, Laura and more people will start to take you seriously.

[Lauda]

Why the hell are you abusing the system if i haven't scam no one then its pointless you doing that; look for someone else not me because i can 100% assure you that i won't scam. watch next year i will still have zero scam attempts meaning you negative ink was pointless. ill even prove it to you that i haven't scammed

There is no abuse happening from my side, but there are a few individuals that are helping their criminal accomplices with their position in the trust system. However, that's not the subject here. There is a *implied* forum etiquette around here. You don't have to explicitly scam anyone to receive a negative rating; we tag people for quite the number of reasons that are very legitimate.

[Zepher]

OP's latest attempt at buying trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2269217.msg22995888#msg22995888

[ripplehd1]

OP's latest attempt at buying trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2269217.msg22995888#msg22995888

Prove it that can mean anything, are you sure you are correct? no evidence of me scamming yet again i will continue to protest against my pointless negative feedback

[Lauda]

OP's latest attempt at buying trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2269217.msg22995888#msg22995888

Prove it that can mean anything, are you sure you are correct? no evidence of me scamming yet again i will continue to protest against my pointless negative feedback

If you continue with similar actions, the only way that your trust rating is going is down.

[posi]

I don't have much to say about this situation and the only I can say is that, the OP of this thread need to accept his/her fate because the modarator of this forum believe account sales encourage scamming and account farming.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

OP, you're making it obvious that you're looking to get green trust.  Everyone who's legit on bitcointalk wants it, but you have to go about it the right way, which means with no bullshit.  Asking the way you're asking is a huge red flag, and Lauda has you tagged appropriately.   It's easy to think that someone who asks for trust is a scammer, and 9/10 times it's probably true. 

Do deals honestly--and not solely for the feedback--and eventually it'll come.  Any other way is suspect.

[ripplehd1]

OP, you're making it obvious that you're looking to get green trust.  Everyone who's legit on bitcointalk wants it, but you have to go about it the right way, which means with no bullshit.  Asking the way you're asking is a huge red flag, and Lauda has you tagged appropriately.   It's easy to think that someone who asks for trust is a scammer, and 9/10 times it's probably true. 

Do deals honestly--and not solely for the feedback--and eventually it'll come.  Any other way is suspect.

im trying to do deals , like today i tried to put my origin account for rent and everybody is saying im a negative trust member 
and what to do now if im not making any bitcoins,  shall i offer a vouch or what?

[Lauda]

OP, you're making it obvious that you're looking to get green trust.  Everyone who's legit on bitcointalk wants it, but you have to go about it the right way, which means with no bullshit.  Asking the way you're asking is a huge red flag, and Lauda has you tagged appropriately.   It's easy to think that someone who asks for trust is a scammer, and 9/10 times it's probably true. 

Do deals honestly--and not solely for the feedback--and eventually it'll come.  Any other way is suspect.

im trying to do deals , like today i tried to put my origin account for rent and everybody is saying im a negative trust member 

Offer the use of escrow. However, selling accounts is a touchy matter as there are a lot of things that can go wrong for both sides even when escrow is used. For example, I wouldn't escrow such a deal.

and what to do now if im not making any bitcoins,  shall i offer a vouch or what?

That's another option.

[BTC-Graphicdesigns]

You continue doing shady stuff -> I continue leaving negative ratings. Simple as that.

You are a filthy shady scammer who was removed from default trust - simple as that.
Stop being Butthurt you german bratwurst!

[The Sceptical Chymist]

You continue doing shady stuff -> I continue leaving negative ratings. Simple as that.

You are a filthy shady scammer who was removed from default trust - simple as that.
Stop being Butthurt you german bratwurst!

Lauda isn't a scammer, and he/she is back on DT as far as I know.  Meanwhile,  you don't even have any feedback from him/her so I don't know where all that bile is coming from--And your feedback leaves much to be desired.

I aspire to be as despised by scammers and shitposters as Lauda is.  I'm working hard to achieve that.  lol

[Lauda]

You continue doing shady stuff -> I continue leaving negative ratings. Simple as that.

You are a filthy shady scammer who was removed from default trust - simple as that.
Stop being Butthurt you german bratwurst!

Lauda isn't a scammer, and he/she is back on DT as far as I know.  Meanwhile,  you don't even have any feedback from him/her so I don't know where all that bile is coming from--And your feedback leaves much to be desired.

What can I say about this user? Make the judgement call yourself.

I aspire to be as despised by scammers and shitposters as Lauda is.  I'm working hard to achieve that.  lol

Good luck.

* Lauda takes a sip of special-for-cats distilled, Marsian whiskey.