[ANN][ICO] 📱 AppCoins - The New Blockchain-Based Protocol For The App Stores 🔋

[lorylore]

This project looks quite promising.Any airdrops available?

Currently, there is Appcoins bounty programs. You can have a look at here and see which campaign you are interested to join.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2295801.0

Cheers.

[BTCWise]

Hi AppCoins, I was wondering if you could please tell me how many tokens would you be willing to send me in exchange for the pin post and renting the cover image for one month in my two bitcoin related Facebook groups.

Group one: https://www.facebook.com/groups/bitcoinkings
Members - 43,297
Pin post - Not available till 23 December
Cover image - Available

Group two: https://www.facebook.com/groups/329207194121901
Members - 3,159
Pin post - Available
Cover image - Available

I look forward to your answer,
Kind regards

[klarki]

Very interesting project, especially because it's backed up by a real business. Looking forward to seeing the bounty campaign.

This does not always have a good effect on the price of the token.

[UpsilonTrooper]

Very interesting project, especially because it's backed up by a real business. Looking forward to seeing the bounty campaign.

This does not always have a good effect on the price of the token.

Yeah failure of the business can mean the coin price will tank hard as the backing for the coin is lost. But ehh wouldnt it generally be better though? Since like most coins lately are just erc20 shitcoins that are quickly pumped and dumped asap.

[lorylore]

Very interesting project, especially because it's backed up by a real business. Looking forward to seeing the bounty campaign.

This does not always have a good effect on the price of the token.

That can be  a good basis to have your judgement on. Comparing to other projects where they dont even have a working products, coins with backing company and work projects tends to have a better tanking of prices and good entry pt.

[xetorkaiba]

Does the login for this has a One Time Password(OTP) to be able to login to unknown device ? Just for security purposes. Thanks!

[defender77]

I gonna ask a question, the answer to which seems to be obvious at first sight. As far as I understand, users will have their own wallets in the service. Will the service leaders have access to them? I’d like to learn more about the safety guarantees)

[spacegt]

Hi, forum users! The most annoying thing concerning Google apps for me is that their quality often remains wanting. Sometimes there’s also malicious software. How do AppCoins developers plan to struggle against this?

[dayasinfo]

Hi, forum users! The most annoying thing concerning Google apps for me is that their quality often remains wanting. Sometimes there’s also malicious software. How do AppCoins developers plan to struggle against this?

Hello! Yeah, such a problem exists. But it's possible to minimize this problem due to blockchain or maybe even to eliminate it. It is introduced due to developers’ estimations, their ratings, and checks of apps before placing them and making available for everybody. 

[spacegt]

Hi, forum users! The most annoying thing concerning Google apps for me is that their quality often remains wanting. Sometimes there’s also malicious software. How do AppCoins developers plan to struggle against this?

Hello! Yeah, such a problem exists. But it's possible to minimize this problem due to blockchain or maybe even to eliminate it. It is introduced due to developers’ estimations, their ratings, and checks of apps before placing them and making available for everybody. 

That's the source of an opportunity for manipulation in the traditional system. I’d like to see more independently evaluated apps without cheating, see the “trustmarks” of developers.

[dayasinfo]

Hi, forum users! The most annoying thing concerning Google apps for me is that their quality often remains wanting. Sometimes there’s also malicious software. How do AppCoins developers plan to struggle against this?

Hello! Yeah, such a problem exists. But it's possible to minimize this problem due to blockchain or maybe even to eliminate it. It is introduced due to developers’ estimations, their ratings, and checks of apps before placing them and making available for everybody. 

That's the source of an opportunity for manipulation in the traditional system. I’d like to see more independently evaluated apps without cheating, see the “trustmarks” of developers.

You’re right noticing that. I’ll repeat it again, blockchain technology allows the project to be decentralized and, consequently, to increase the “transparency” of the developments placed. The opinion of the community will be the most important thing, so it means that everyone will receive understandable and honest ratings.

[spacegt]

Hi, forum users! The most annoying thing concerning Google apps for me is that their quality often remains wanting. Sometimes there’s also malicious software. How do AppCoins developers plan to struggle against this?

Hello! Yeah, such a problem exists. But it's possible to minimize this problem due to blockchain or maybe even to eliminate it. It is introduced due to developers’ estimations, their ratings, and checks of apps before placing them and making available for everybody. 

That's the source of an opportunity for manipulation in the traditional system. I’d like to see more independently evaluated apps without cheating, see the “trustmarks” of developers.

You’re right noticing that. I’ll repeat it again, blockchain technology allows the project to be decentralized and, consequently, to increase the “transparency” of the developments placed. The opinion of the community will be the most important thing, so it means that everyone will receive understandable and honest ratings.

Very well! If we continue elaborate on this topic, what documents or procedures will regulate the relationship between developers and users? I'm talking about the situation when someone gets disappointed, when there are arguments.

[dayasinfo]

Hi, forum users! The most annoying thing concerning Google apps for me is that their quality often remains wanting. Sometimes there’s also malicious software. How do AppCoins developers plan to struggle against this?

Hello! Yeah, such a problem exists. But it's possible to minimize this problem due to blockchain or maybe even to eliminate it. It is introduced due to developers’ estimations, their ratings, and checks of apps before placing them and making available for everybody. 

That's the source of an opportunity for manipulation in the traditional system. I’d like to see more independently evaluated apps without cheating, see the “trustmarks” of developers.

You’re right noticing that. I’ll repeat it again, blockchain technology allows the project to be decentralized and, consequently, to increase the “transparency” of the developments placed. The opinion of the community will be the most important thing, so it means that everyone will receive understandable and honest ratings.

Very well! If we continue elaborate on this topic, what documents or procedures will regulate the relationship between developers and users? I'm talking about the situation when someone gets disappointed, when there are arguments.

The project provides properly developed smart contracts, which solve the lion's share of problems from the very beginning. If it is impossible to solve the difficulties in the framework of a smart contract, they will be solved with the help of arbitrators within the system.

[spacegt]

Hi, forum users! The most annoying thing concerning Google apps for me is that their quality often remains wanting. Sometimes there’s also malicious software. How do AppCoins developers plan to struggle against this?

Hello! Yeah, such a problem exists. But it's possible to minimize this problem due to blockchain or maybe even to eliminate it. It is introduced due to developers’ estimations, their ratings, and checks of apps before placing them and making available for everybody. 

That's the source of an opportunity for manipulation in the traditional system. I’d like to see more independently evaluated apps without cheating, see the “trustmarks” of developers.

You’re right noticing that. I’ll repeat it again, blockchain technology allows the project to be decentralized and, consequently, to increase the “transparency” of the developments placed. The opinion of the community will be the most important thing, so it means that everyone will receive understandable and honest ratings.

Very well! If we continue elaborate on this topic, what documents or procedures will regulate the relationship between developers and users? I'm talking about the situation when someone gets disappointed, when there are arguments.

The project provides properly developed smart contracts, which solve the lion's share of problems from the very beginning. If it is impossible to solve the difficulties in the framework of a smart contract, they will be solved with the help of arbitrators within the system.

Ah, it's clear! Are these arbitrators something like an independent entity?

[BlockJohn]

Something makes me being worried. How the return of the funds invested is guaranteed in event of unsuccessful raise of finds at the start of the project?

AppCoins just reached the soft cap ($2.5m).

[Dr0idGuru]

Does the login for this has a One Time Password(OTP) to be able to login to unknown device ? Just for security purposes. Thanks!

You mean in the App Stores or in the ICO ?

[UpsilonTrooper]

Something makes me being worried. How the return of the funds invested is guaranteed in event of unsuccessful raise of finds at the start of the project?

That would probably be the risk you need to take. If you're not confident that people wont invest, putting your money in wouldn't be a good idea either

[hollybit]

Hello! I’ve heard that the project already has a lot of active users; this fact will undoubtedly help on the ICO. How many users are already there?

[newboi]

Hello! I’ve heard that the project already has a lot of active users; this fact will undoubtedly help on the ICO. How many users are already there?

Greetings! This will be the first ICO with more than 200 million users.

[slavonicpl]

What’s up! I’ve heard that the project is going to put tokens on the exchange. When and on which exchange will the coins finally appear?