Problem of nowadays ICOs

[Pleione527]

The projects of all ICO's in the market has a good quality the only reason why they experience lack of investors or not much given prioritize is because there's a lot of ICO introduce in the market and people tend to find it difficult recognizing the best one to invest. I think if they will put some limitations in making different ICO they can penetrate the market and earn good profit from it.

[Oo ako to]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

That is really the reason. Most of investors are in it because of the profit. They just want to multiply their money and you will notice that the people who made huge investment force devs to hasten their project. They really don't care what it will do, they only see it as a way of making a fortune.

[ASHLIUSZ]

These days people were much aware about the projects objective and used to spend time knowing about the backing support as well the roadmap. Only after that used to invest, also nowadays the developer teams too were much dedicated to the project success and ico going as scams has decreased drastically.

[ALT67890]

It can be blame both ways, ICO making is abused and too much of it make even crowded the market/forum that investors can’t focus on one or two alone. Because if they can the chances of the ICO is high but the reality is they make duplicates left and right to scam new investors.

Then those investors are too clueless of what an ICO scam looks like and even they have experienced it, they even tried to do it again. That’s is really a bad thing.

[Michae1k]

every day become more difficult to find a good projects, almost 50% are scam, and you just lose ur money. It's always risky, but sometimes it worth it

[Sid3d]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

I also believe that some investors do completely unnecessary projects that will not be of use. Sometimes they come to mind completely stupid thoughts or they copy other projects. And again, there are a lot of scammers who want to take care of someone else's account.

[slaman29]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

This has always been an old "problem", even with traditional public fundraising such as IPOs and the like. Non-professional and normal investors really do think with profit in mind. ICOs simply open up the market even wider, with students and others that banks wouldn't even look at all able to "invest".

Less than 1% of people are in crypto, and even less than 1% of that do their own research. And probably less than 1% of THAT have solid and reliable research.

[Warkop]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

That is really the reason. Most of investors are in it because of the profit. They just want to multiply their money and you will notice that the people who made huge investment force devs to hasten their project. They really don't care what it will do, they only see it as a way of making a fortune.

If they accelerate the ICO project, it may be true what you say, because big investors do not want to wait long and pay attention to the profits they will get, so they do not want to wait for the old project he invests. Because he wants everything will be done quickly.

[Kupid002]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

That is really the reason. Most of investors are in it because of the profit. They just want to multiply their money and you will notice that the people who made huge investment force devs to hasten their project. They really don't care what it will do, they only see it as a way of making a fortune.

If they accelerate the ICO project, it may be true what you say, because big investors do not want to wait long and pay attention to the profits they will get, so they do not want to wait for the old project he invests. Because he wants everything will be done quickly.

But if may continue the ICO that they already existed for maybe they may just continue on doing it and i may agree on it most investors as of now really want to have a quick money they want to get it easily so as long as the possibility of getting it quickly are good they may continue on this situation.

[Akash1243]

Yes i do think that investors dont know or care about the ICOs as they only want short term investment for which ICOs are great and quite profitable in short term.And there are many ICOs in which majority of them are scam or just fail coins,the quality of ICOs has surely fall very much.Investors just think altcoins as an easy and fast way to earn small profits with some investment and with that profit they usually invest in big coins like bitcoins or even ethereum.

[2Pac]

for me the biggest problem of ICOs is wrong behaviours of managers like acting just for the making money without demand of real success, steps which are not related the roadmap, deficient development or permanence.

[ValoremFoundation]

for me the biggest problem of ICOs is wrong behaviours of managers like acting just for the making money without demand of real success, steps which are not related the roadmap, deficient development or permanence.

Absolutely, you should definitely be able to measure previous success from the managers who promote their ICO's

[naughty1]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

I think there are too many ICOs out there that make it impossible for investors to find out about the projects, since they feel confused, they can not know where to invest. . It's like finding a bird in a forest.

[samysamy1]

Just don't invest anymore in silly ICO's. If you want to make some money, go trade some alts.

[tobs]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

In a way you are right. But it's also about number of ICO projects and technologies they want to deliver considering today's development of blockchain and cryptoworld. I mean it's still sort of underground community, yet the ICOs want to introduce tokens to every aspect of our lives. And we have really good and quality projects about insurance, healthcare, travel agencies, games, social medias. These are things we are using everyday, right? But mainstream users have no idea what blockchain and tokens are and why would they want to deal with them if they already have the same services. The problem with ICO in my opinion, is that everyone can issue it and they try to be the first ones to do this in their field, yet the whole crypto market is too young for so many blockchain services.

[Al Amin]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

I agree with that. Because most investors are now putting their passion rather than researching projects that are the place to invest. Or there is a problem about ICO itself which always claims that it is the best for the future.

[tomorow]

They dont care about the project, they care about the investment. Not to mention several ICOs here that don't fit in the blockchain tech and could be done with conventional systems years ago and are just recicled ideas. 

[Team Saske]

Don't you think that the problem of ongoing and upcoming ICOs is not the quality of projects (certainly there are scam projects, but there are also a great deal of really working projects backed with technology) but the problem is in the quality of investors who don't really make their research and mostly even don't care do read anything about the project they are going to invests in. They are in rush to buy any altcoins because it seems to be an easy way to make money for them.. What do you think?

You're absolutely right! Most "investors" are nothing more than gamblers looking to get-rich-quick. They do zero research, have zero discipline and, so, have zero commitment to the projects they put money into.

Honestly, they're better off taking their rolls of quarters to Vegas.

[Coenlogan]

Nowadays ICOs are unfortunately not setting the expectations right. They are claming their ICO will be the best one , most profitable one etc.. What i look for in an ICO is being realistic about the project and setting their project on strong pillars. I prefer doable projects ratherdan dream sellers.

Totally agree, some icos are promising life changing results but are giving extremely vague explanations on what it is they are actually doing.

Like a project tokenloyalty - i have asked them multiple times, what are you doing exactly? In response I get a video of a dog and random statements.

project like ASSETRON ENERGY - staright away i understood in simple terms that they will build a platform where people can invest into renewable energy projects using crypto, and vice versa, people can request to have their renewable projects invested into, so a peer to peer marketplace for renewable energy projects. As their tokens are the only ones that can be used on the system, the demand will grow as more projects are on the platform.

I dont need complex english on these ICOS, just to make them look "pro", they need to be able to explain to all investors, especially ones who may be foreign.
Just my 2 cents

[letecia012]

every day become more difficult to find a good projects, almost 50% are scam, and you just lose ur money. It's always risky, but sometimes it worth it

Yes too many ICO but if you read their introduction it looks like the same they keep posting that the have the cheapest fee in processing transaction the have fastest time compared to Bitcoin but in the end if you invest at their coin your money will put in limbo. If you want to invest better to go on coin that already have a track record