DragonCoinZ
Member
 Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 33
|
 |
January 10, 2018, 09:46:34 PM |
|
Don't believe the FUDs you read here. The project is active and ongoing.
Where do you know it? Are you in contact with the devs? Maybe you can say them, they should give some news about their project. So we can destroy all these accusations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptoagrr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
January 10, 2018, 11:08:50 PM |
|
Don't believe the FUDs you read here. The project is active and ongoing.
Where do you know it? Are you in contact with the devs? Maybe you can say them, they should give some news about their project. So we can destroy all these accusations. ^ This |
|
|
|
|
ardia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 1
|
|
January 10, 2018, 11:22:22 PM |
|
It just seems like the stupidest exit scam in the history of exit scams... If the Devs DID do this (and we will find out soon enough), be forgiving. They have had a very hard life.  |
|
|
|
|
drilldown
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
January 11, 2018, 01:18:28 AM |
|
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
|
|
|
|
|
sultanadnan
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
January 11, 2018, 01:42:19 AM |
|
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
Exactly this! |
|
|
|
|
ardia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 1
|
|
January 11, 2018, 02:31:51 AM |
|
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
Could you give us some etherscan addresses to back up your statements? |
|
|
|
|
rlm41
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
January 11, 2018, 07:01:50 AM |
|
I saw that we have an announcements Telegram but do we have a Telegram for discussion? If not someone should make one!
|
|
|
|
|
ardia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 1
|
|
January 11, 2018, 07:28:09 AM |
|
I saw that we have an announcements Telegram but do we have a Telegram for discussion? If not someone should make one!
Go make one! |
|
|
|
|
rlm41
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
January 11, 2018, 07:37:59 AM |
|
I saw that we have an announcements Telegram but do we have a Telegram for discussion? If not someone should make one!
Go make one! Ok i did: http://t.me/ethgasdiscussion |
|
|
|
|
drilldown
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
January 11, 2018, 08:05:13 AM |
|
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
Could you give us some etherscan addresses to back up your statements? look at the transfers in from etherdelta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ardia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 1
|
|
January 11, 2018, 10:22:42 AM |
|
Doesn't seem to allow discussions... |
|
|
|
|
Seasonic
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
January 11, 2018, 10:22:58 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2018, 07:34:57 AM by Seasonic |
|
Ok and what about the 16 000$ in Ethereum that were transfered from etherdelta to private wallets 3 day after 1 000 000 eGas were placed on the market ? (When the price of the token was around 0,01c$ so make your calculations)
What are you still doing here after you said you have sold your tokens and advised others to do the same? Oh you wanted them to sell so that you can buy their tokens cheap? @Muffin17, you are a bloody FUDers, a very shameless and evil one indeed. |
|
|
|
|
Seasonic
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
|
|
January 11, 2018, 10:25:39 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2018, 07:35:51 AM by Seasonic |
|
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
Could you give us some etherscan addresses to back up your statements? look at the transfers in from etherdelta You guys should remember there was a hack in Etherdelta, and the management advised users to move their tokens from old addresses to another. |
|
|
|
|
ardia
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 1
|
|
January 11, 2018, 10:28:12 AM |
|
What are you still doing here after you said you have sold your tokens and advised others to do the same? Oh you wanted them to sell so that you can buy their tokens cheap? @Muffin17, you are a bloody FUDers, a very shameless and evil one indeed.
Id give him the benefit of the doubt... he seems to have sold his 35K tokens as he said. Its on the EGAS Etherdelta page: 0.000065000 35300.000 2.295 Or https://etherscan.io/tx/0x8878e2fbd49926e3b86045d9e036ae89247fa81d1f25dab5d9fbfed215537720 |
|
|
|
|
Jan_dG
Member
Offline
Activity: 144
Merit: 10
|
|
January 11, 2018, 10:31:16 AM |
|
The FUD is apparently still going on.
To all doubters:
There are no red flags, there is no fake whitepaper (it is just a first draft version), there are no dubious transactions from the team.
This team does not communicate much, which is a pity but not a problem.
The DEV of Chainlink hardly ever speaks, and see the result.
The eGAS team once said that trading in their tokens is not their responsibility. That is fair, clear, and it gives me confidence.
They just continue working on the SAaS project and we can expect a first demo soon. That is what they have promised, and I believe that.
So far they have kept their promises.
This is not a pep talk ... for me it does not matter if this project fails. I do not lose much.
But my intuition says that this is a fair and an absolutely good project.
|
|
|
|
|
DragonCoinZ
Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 33
|
|
January 11, 2018, 03:14:01 PM |
|
The FUD is apparently still going on.
To all doubters:
There are no red flags, there is no fake whitepaper (it is just a first draft version), there are no dubious transactions from the team.
This team does not communicate much, which is a pity but not a problem.
The DEV of Chainlink hardly ever speaks, and see the result.
The eGAS team once said that trading in their tokens is not their responsibility. That is fair, clear, and it gives me confidence.
They just continue working on the SAaS project and we can expect a first demo soon. That is what they have promised, and I believe that.
So far they have kept their promises.
This is not a pep talk ... for me it does not matter if this project fails. I do not lose much.
But my intuition says that this is a fair and an absolutely good project.
Are you in contact with the devs? It would be nice to just hear something from them. Just a sign that there still alive and the work continues on their project. |
|
|
|
|
cryptovagas
Member
Offline
Activity: 341
Merit: 10
@cryptovagas
|
|
January 11, 2018, 04:25:25 PM |
|
Yes it will be great to meet them, or eve hear from them
Market is showing some interest to this project if its not artificial pump
Dev can use the current situation in favour of project if it is still important
|
For Sale....
PM me!
|
|
|
erentils
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
January 11, 2018, 04:28:49 PM
Last edit: January 11, 2018, 04:48:40 PM by erentils |
|
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
Exactly this! The large price increase was me buying 6ETH (about 190k) worth from $0.02 to $0.06, and telling my coworkers to buy some too. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1f9ca523464ab3084f6d8dd3768d239f661e7b4fdbf929f4fcfc57df33f42806 |
|
|
|
|
Jan_dG
Member
Offline
Activity: 144
Merit: 10
|
|
January 11, 2018, 04:45:11 PM |
|
The FUD is apparently still going on.
To all doubters:
There are no red flags, there is no fake whitepaper (it is just a first draft version), there are no dubious transactions from the team.
This team does not communicate much, which is a pity but not a problem.
The DEV of Chainlink hardly ever speaks, and see the result.
The eGAS team once said that trading in their tokens is not their responsibility. That is fair, clear, and it gives me confidence.
They just continue working on the SAaS project and we can expect a first demo soon. That is what they have promised, and I believe that.
So far they have kept their promises.
This is not a pep talk ... for me it does not matter if this project fails. I do not lose much.
But my intuition says that this is a fair and an absolutely good project.
Are you in contact with the devs? It would be nice to just hear something from them. Just a sign that there still alive and the work continues on their project. I have no contact with the developers. I work in psychiatry and have some life experience. Based on that, I estimate a project. I do research and read between the lines. It is too complicated to explain everything, but my feeling says that we are here in a damn good project. In the last 8 years all my predictions have been correct. Now I can be wrong for the first time, so do not hold on to me. I believe in ETHGAS, and I hope that this will not be my first mistake. Just wait for their next announcement, which can come any moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
