Do you support direct payment in ETH for bounty? (POLL)

[hase0278]

Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?

I think that bounty campaigns paying ETH directly is nice, but I think paying 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens is better. It will be convenient not only for the bounty participants but also to the developer as well. It will benefit developers since the dump that will be caused by bounty participants would be lessened and at the same time, bounty participants does not need to worry about fees when transferring to and from ETH wallet to exchange.

[shinharu10282016]

I would rather choose ETH if I see that the project is not going to be that profitable in the near future. You don't hold tokens for more than a year thats absurd. Lol

But if I can see profitability in a year or less why not hold half tokens and receive eth?

[Olatunjex]

Payment with their token or coin is the best but the only negative effect of that is the hunter dumping their tokens or coins. Though not only hunter does that many ico participants also dump their bonus. I prefer payment in their token in full.

[Crumple Cat]

Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?

This is good but it is impossible to happen because the ICO are promoting their own altcoin too in which they should promote their token more in order for them to be known that is why some ICO are giving their token for free in we called this air drops. They are using the ethereum but limited to platform only so that investors could easily trade at the cheaper price.

Thanks for your opinion. You know, a few bounty campaign examples of 50\50 already exist, probably the founders of these projects found this solution beneficial. Likely that this approach may be even more effective influence on the promotion of the token.

[residivis]

if in my opinion if the token and eth price is very far is not fair if such a process is done because it can harm half of the work of the participants bounty.sebab eth very much berberbeda with the price of the tokens.
that's my view.

[lovesybitz]

Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?

For me it is much better to pay in token than direct eth, it is because there is a big instances that the token can multiply the value more than 5x  than to be pay at eth at once.

[Mizan007]

Payment with their token or coin is the best but the only negative effect of that is the hunter dumping their tokens or coins. Though not only hunter does that many ico participants also dump their bonus. I prefer payment in their token in full.

If direct payment in ethereum for bounty it is not good for new altcoin. Because everyone get eth so they do not use new token or coin .

[bananadines]

Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?

I think it would be great to pay in ETH for all the project that do bounty campaigns. A lot of investors are scared about good bounty payout and a huge dump after the ICO!

[redhondaxrm125]

Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?

p.s. If you know similar examples, share please in the comments

You are absolutely right. I couldn't agree more. Payments should be 50/50. Half etherium, and half of the token they are promoting or lesser. I don't know, but as long as it has etherium it will be great. Because this ensures value for the people who work for the project. At least if the price doesn't go up, the participants still receive the amount of etherium that they deserve.

[kemet jr]

I vote No. Developers have the intention to have their token made known and be circulated for it to gain traction. They will still be able to get a lot of bounty participants even if they don't pay on eth. 50 - 50 is more of an advantage to the bounty campaigners i guess.

[illiki23]

Bounties are generally in place to help raise funds for prospective coins so that they can develop and then market secure, stable, working product.

When a bounty campaign begins the project generally has little to no funding.  What the developers do have are tokens which hopefully will be worth something someday.  They can't offer ETH because they don't know if and how much ETH will be raised but they can offer their tokens.

This is very similar to traditional startups who offer equity to initial employees. 

Now later, either after raising money or the coin gains, they obviously can and do fund development in other ways.  By this time the bounty campaigns are generally long over.

Ask yourself:  would you rather be offered tokens which may end up worth a lot or a little or told "we may or may not give you ETH for your work depending on whether we raise enough or not"?

[bobq]

The best thing would be to give half of the bounties in ETH and half in the own issued tokens. This way perhaps the bounty hunters would not run to dump their tokens immediately.

[josephinerosdy]

what the investor feels if the money they invest by taking risks directly distributed to bounty participants.
50% eth 50% token just make hassle when distributed with a lot of participants

[Argoo]

Of course, I would like to pay for participation in the generosity campaigns to get an ethereum, and not cheaper, and token, but I think that this is impossible. To do this, you need the team to spend money, which they will not have. The whole point is for them to pay the tokenies they create.

[tradingcryptocoach]

it will never be happened ..else owner will become beggar

[Tamilson]

Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?

p.s. If you know similar examples, share please in the comments

ICOs will never do that, like what's the use of having ICO anyway? When you want is to pay you with eth.
Of course they're advertising their tokens and if they will pay us using their tokens we can help them to have a good coin circulation like when we dump it and if we decide to buy back again. And you know that their tokens can still be sell for eth.

[legenduim]

I suppose it is better to pay for Bounty with tokens, and most projects offer exactly this way of payment. However, ETH payments are also possible — probably not 50/50, but something like 80/20.

[jakagintiri]

Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?

p.s. If you know similar examples, share please in the comments

I prefer 50-50 payment. that way we will have both, and after that, we can exchange them according to the price we want. of course, we will be many different opinions. many people choose only by getting payments with tokens and some who want to get paid by ETH. it all depends on everyone.

[Crumple Cat]

it will never be happened ..else owner will become beggar

..and they will starve to death Are you seriously?

[chidrawarster]

In this case, i want be fair enough. I would suggest 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens as bounty hunters also should understand that money belongs to somebody else meant for investment purpose. I still see that would be the great way to bring in more participants for campaigning and make the ICO's more succesfull. I also feel ICO's become popular because of of healthy campaigning in place , so the devs should atleast think about paying some amount in ETH for motivation atleast.