|
Capitalism Prevails (OP)
|
 |
June 17, 2013, 04:38:34 AM |
|
That would seem like a perfect match to me.
|
BTC: 1KX3MSyeHoubjvRMvkc4DXBXvEx9fr9cvV Strength In Numbers
LTC: LaGawfU1ZJu33Lj6CX6NJ5WXWsfjPbLLLW In Cryptography We Trust
NMC: N5EUwGbCNF1AYmZqNu9J7aYJVKxqbJoJG8 Cut Off One Node, Two More Will Take Its Place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
etotheipi
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1093
Core Armory Developer
|
|
June 17, 2013, 04:52:46 PM |
|
Short answer: yes
I was actually planning on getting in touch with them soon, to discuss some way we could help each other out.
|
|
|
|
casadebitcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
July 22, 2014, 02:17:53 AM |
|
Short answer: yes
I was actually planning on getting in touch with them soon, to discuss some way we could help each other out.
BUMP Any updates on the integration of (AWESOME) Armory and Trezor? BTW really enjoyed your talk at the MIT Bitcoin Expo, you did a great job presenting. |
|
|
|
|
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1347
Armory Developer
|
|
July 22, 2014, 04:57:41 PM |
|
Along with the BIP32 wallet version, so either 0.93 or 0.94.
|
|
|
|
m30188
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2014, 06:27:33 PM |
|
Along with the BIP32 wallet version, so either 0.93 or 0.94.
Any update on this? I have a Trezor, but I don't like using it with MyTrezor.com |
|
|
|
|
Newar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001
https://gliph.me/hUF
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:10:27 AM |
|
Along with the BIP32 wallet version, so either 0.93 or 0.94.
Any update on this? I have a Trezor, but I don't like using it with MyTrezor.com Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.
|
|
|
|
LordMord
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2014, 11:07:43 AM |
|
Trezor support at best in the next release, that's late October/early November if everything goes according to plan.
It is early November any update on this feature. |
|
|
|
|
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1347
Armory Developer
|
|
November 10, 2014, 11:27:29 AM |
|
We will come with a test build in the upcoming weeks, but there is no guaranty the new wallets will be ready by then. Our short term goal is to improve the robustness of the new backend, and then the new wallets when they are ready, so we won't be implementing support for Trezor while we aren't satisfied with the solidity of all this new code.
|
|
|
|
|
e4xit
|
|
November 17, 2014, 11:13:03 AM |
|
We will come with a test build in the upcoming weeks, but there is no guaranty the new wallets will be ready by then. Our short term goal is to improve the robustness of the new backend, and then the new wallets when they are ready, so we won't be implementing support for Trezor while we aren't satisfied with the solidity of all this new code.
Thanks goatpig. Is there by any chance an "Armory Roadmap" or similar that is publically available? |
Not your keys, not your coins.
CoinJoin, always.
|
|
|
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1347
Armory Developer
|
|
November 17, 2014, 08:48:01 PM |
|
We have a roadmap, but nothing public. You can still try your luck with etotheipi =P
|
|
|
|
|
7queue
|
|
November 17, 2014, 08:51:09 PM |
|
Excellent news!
|
8 )
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
December 10, 2014, 06:47:19 PM |
|
Very much looking forward to Armory/Trezor integration  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gweedo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 23, 2015, 01:08:44 AM |
|
Anything is better than that horrible wallet electrum which is the only desktop wallet that supports trezor besides a website.
|
|
|
|
|
goatpig
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1347
Armory Developer
|
|
June 23, 2015, 04:38:22 AM |
|
It's the same as it was before. We want to implement Trezor support, but we need to finish the new wallets first (our current wallet format is not compatible with Trezor).
|
|
|
|
Portnoy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1000
My money; Our Bitcoin.
|
|
July 08, 2015, 07:10:49 PM |
|
Very much looking forward to Armory/Trezor integration +1 |
|
|
|
|
|
PabloW
|
|
July 15, 2015, 05:05:44 AM |
|
It's the same as it was before. We want to implement Trezor support, but we need to finish the new wallets first (our current wallet format is not compatible with Trezor).
What will be the changes on the new wallets that will allow it to implement Trezor that the current wallet doesn't have? |
|
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3074
|
|
July 15, 2015, 06:36:06 AM |
|
It's the same as it was before. We want to implement Trezor support, but we need to finish the new wallets first (our current wallet format is not compatible with Trezor).
What will be the changes on the new wallets that will allow it to implement Trezor that the current wallet doesn't have? BIP32. All the wallet functions of BIP32 wallets are available to Armory users now, as it's wallet format already uses H/D address generation, but it currently uses Armory's own format (which won't operate with a Trezor directly). So it's just about inter-operating with standards defined outside Armory, basically. |
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3074
|
|
July 18, 2015, 10:46:07 AM |
|
Incidentally, I have discovered that out of all the options available, there is no possibility to use a Trezor with wallet software that protects your extended public key and/or public key seed (not sure which of those each piece of wallet software uses). This is as a result of the non-decentralised aspects of those wallets; even Multibit must reveal the pertaining extended public key to the bitcoin core nodes that it uses to validate each transaction.
Armory is the only prospect for using a Trezor privately, particularly important if you would also like to use the Trezor for authenticating logins. I'd like to use a hardware wallet for the long term, but if there's any question as to whether Trezor integration will happen, then I'll have to start thinking about alternatives. Can we get some kind of commitment that the integration will happen? I am willing to help test etc
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
|
AussieHash
|
|
July 18, 2015, 12:39:28 PM |
|
Incidentally, I have discovered that out of all the options available, there is no possibility to use a Trezor with wallet software that protects your extended public key and/or public key seed (not sure which of those each piece of wallet software uses). This is as a result of the non-decentralised aspects of those wallets; even Multibit must reveal the pertaining extended public key to the bitcoin core nodes that it uses to validate each transaction.
You could host your own full node, and electrum server (or jelectrum). I've been asking the folks at mycelium to allow a SPV connection to your own full node, this would also work |
|
|
|
|
|
