Phinnaeus Gage scammer tag request

[Welsh]

Nice attempt as deflecting people away from the fact that you blatantly stated you would not honor a commitment you made.  No one cares about your red herrings or how piss poor of a decision maker you are or that you lost $100k out of your own stupidity. 

This thread is about how you are trying to weasel out of your commitment to donate $200 once certain conditions were met, which they have been.  If you want to setup a fund, by all means, please do so... I don't care. It's not about the $200, it's about the fact that you're a dishonest person at your core and you provide nothing positive to the bitcoin community.  You are a parasite and an attention whore; the only thing that matters to you is how much attention you get, not what effects your attention seeking have on your victims.

You even prove my point in this post: You wouldn't want to delete a post because it would lower your post count and someone would pass you by!  Yep, that's an important reason to have a high post count.  It's all about attention for you, I understand that.  It doesn't matter who you hurt in the process, so long as you get the attention, right?

well actually what he has done doesn't warrant a scammer tag, since technically he didn't scam you. Did he fail on his promise? Yes. Did he scam you? No

Any promises of a donation made on the internet should be taken as a promise from a drunk friend.

The fact of the matter, people break promises. Imagine going to court because the TV promised me I would get thinner....jesus

[Inaba]

Nice attempt as deflecting people away from the fact that you blatantly stated you would not honor a commitment you made.  No one cares about your red herrings or how piss poor of a decision maker you are or that you lost $100k out of your own stupidity. 

This thread is about how you are trying to weasel out of your commitment to donate $200 once certain conditions were met, which they have been.  If you want to setup a fund, by all means, please do so... I don't care. It's not about the $200, it's about the fact that you're a dishonest person at your core and you provide nothing positive to the bitcoin community.  You are a parasite and an attention whore; the only thing that matters to you is how much attention you get, not what effects your attention seeking have on your victims.

You even prove my point in this post: You wouldn't want to delete a post because it would lower your post count and someone would pass you by!  Yep, that's an important reason to have a high post count.  It's all about attention for you, I understand that.  It doesn't matter who you hurt in the process, so long as you get the attention, right?

well actually what he has done doesn't warrant a scammer tag, since technically he didn't scam you. Did he fail on his promise? Yes. Did he scam you? No

Any promises of a donation made on the internet should be taken as a promise from a drunk friend.

I'm not disagreeing with you.  I'm just proving a point.

[nimda]

Welcome to dramatalk, where the scammer tags don't matter and everything is illegal

I want to thank Phin for always being absolutely ridiculous in his characteristic deadpan manner. I imagine if held at gunpoint, he would begin to talk about some failed deal involving 3 laptops and half a duck.

[r3wt]

Nice attempt as deflecting people away from the fact that you blatantly stated you would not honor a commitment you made.  No one cares about your red herrings or how piss poor of a decision maker you are or that you lost $100k out of your own stupidity. 

This thread is about how you are trying to weasel out of your commitment to donate $200 once certain conditions were met, which they have been.  If you want to setup a fund, by all means, please do so... I don't care. It's not about the $200, it's about the fact that you're a dishonest person at your core and you provide nothing positive to the bitcoin community.  You are a parasite and an attention whore; the only thing that matters to you is how much attention you get, not what effects your attention seeking have on your victims.

You even prove my point in this post: You wouldn't want to delete a post because it would lower your post count and someone would pass you by!  Yep, that's an important reason to have a high post count.  It's all about attention for you, I understand that.  It doesn't matter who you hurt in the process, so long as you get the attention, right?

well actually what he has done doesn't warrant a scammer tag, since technically he didn't scam you. Did he fail on his promise? Yes. Did he scam you? No

Any promises of a donation made on the internet should be taken as a promise from a drunk friend.

I'm not disagreeing with you.  I'm just proving a point.

Well consider your point proven. He broke the promise to donate. everyone's acknowledging that fact. Still doesn't make him a scammer. I once had a guy promise to donate 500 dollars on paypal for my website, and he did. problem is i don't have a verified pp. So i asked him if he would pay me in bitcoin instead and he said sure, deny the paypal donation and i will send you some btc. Never heard from him again.

[r3wt]

Welcome to dramatalk, where the scammer tags don't matter and everything is illegal

I want to thank Phin for always being absolutely ridiculous in his characteristic deadpan manner. I imagine if held at gunpoint, he would begin to talk about some failed deal involving 3 laptops and half a duck.

+1

[Inedible]

I would like to nominate Phinnaeus Gage for a scammer tag.

This is amazing! It's been a long time since I've ever been nominated for anything. I hope all my friends show up at the awards ceremony along with the gala afterwards if the nomination proves fruitful. I have first dibs to dance with Rassah, and I hope somebody remembers to bring a goat.

No need for theymos to check the logs, for whatever been recently send via PM to Josh, I will confirm, being the dishonest guy I am and all. That includes the one in the OP.

Yep, Josh is so correct. I deserve the scammer tag for currently breaking a promise of sending $200 for I is so dishonest. Nevermind the fact that I've never scammed a single satoshi from anybody, nor have or will even think of doing such. Yet, I'm currently out over $100K due to this Bitcoin thingy, $500+ of which pertaining to three hero members on this forum who've ordered custom tooled leather ware from my brother-in-law and never paid me, but I paid Martin. To this day they have yet to reply to my emails and PMs, but I wouldn't even think of ratting out their names, let along request scammer tags, of which no longer exist on this forum. But I digress, for that's neither here nor there.

I also confirm that what Josh has stated about it first being a $100 promise, converted to a $200 one is true, and the post was not deleted because I'm not crazy...that would've lowered my post count allowing some other to past me by. Thus, Josh was mistaken^TM when he penned his thinking that a post of mine may have gone AWOL.

I believe that it is so kind of Josh to offer up himself as a new toy for me to play with, even going so far as to creating a special thread for the occasion for all to read and enjoy. As a special perk to his obligations at BFL, he gets to do such on company time on Sonny K.'s (oops! wrong guy) dime. I have no way in knowing, but maybe he's doing such on his breaks or just passing time while waiting for the phone call from the FCC informing BFL that all systems are go.

I received a PM from a kind fellow Bitcoiner offering up to pay this debt. I haven't yet taking the time to reply to him, but I will be refusing his kind offer, for it's my obligation, one of which I will have no problem fulfilling--on my terms.

That said, I'll cave! I will be donating the $200 to a charity of BFL's choice in the future, for doing such in the past is too late. I will first recheck my posts to make sure that I do so within the specific time frame that I promised to do it in, that's if Josh didn't have the mods remove it because it was incorporated in some post he wanted deleted for being off-topic.

As the time approaches for me to dole out the dough, I will first set up some trust fund accompanied with a Bitcoin address so that I'll be able to accept donations to augment the pool. One could argue that this is akin to the sauce/goose/gander idiom.

Sonny: Josh, why are you crying?
Josh: He's...he's...playin' me! And I...I...always...win, but...
Sonny: Take it easy, bro! You just need a vacation.
Josh: May...be. Where?
Sonny: Got a conference coming up, and you'll be manning the booth. Sadly, once again we won't be mentioned on any of the official flyers, but you don't see me crying.
Josh: You's the bestest!
Sonny: I know! Now, suck my dick.

I can't see how awarding you with a scammer tag would be of benefit to anyone. It would just devalue the scammer tag.

Not keeping a commitment, now that's going to take a hit on your integrity.

[pheaonix]

Nice attempt as deflecting people away from the fact that you blatantly stated you would not honor a commitment you made.  No one cares about your red herrings or how piss poor of a decision maker you are or that you lost $100k out of your own stupidity. 

This thread is about how you are trying to weasel out of your commitment to donate $200 once certain conditions were met, which they have been.  If you want to setup a fund, by all means, please do so... I don't care. It's not about the $200, it's about the fact that you're a dishonest person at your core and you provide nothing positive to the bitcoin community.  You are a parasite and an attention whore; the only thing that matters to you is how much attention you get, not what effects your attention seeking have on your victims.

You even prove my point in this post: You wouldn't want to delete a post because it would lower your post count and someone would pass you by!  Yep, that's an important reason to have a high post count.  It's all about attention for you, I understand that.  It doesn't matter who you hurt in the process, so long as you get the attention, right?

its only fair that phin can go by the same rules you did for your "donation" because of a lost bet. Remember how you set up a donation fund for your own "company", so you could dodge paying out? phin should be able to set up the "inaba is a faggot" charity, where all proceeds go towards making inaba butthurt. Phin would be the sole recipient of the funds. Get to it!

[Inedible]

Phinnaeus, was a date set for the payment date?

[Minor Miner]

Josh;

I have only one thing to say about this.  I do not think, you of all the people on this forum, should post searchable words like scam or criminal behavior etc. with your name.   I think you should LIE LOW.   Very low.   You have pissed far too many people off through either, fraud or incompetence (or association with complete fraud or incompetence) and you probably do not want to keep building a searchable database where some authority actually finds your name(s) and then keeps searching....
And, then they find crime after crime after crime.   And then, they might actually get off their ass and do something that the taxpayers pay them to do.   That would not be so fun for you.    These searches are simple, even a computer moron like me successfully did them and found tax evasion, money laundering and fraud all publicly advertised by Inaba and Josh Zerlin.    Do not assume a government employee is incompetent.   Take my advice.   Lie low, shut your mouth and be glad you are currently free.

[r3wt]

I would like to nominate Phinnaeus Gage for a scammer tag.

This is amazing! It's been a long time since I've ever been nominated for anything. I hope all my friends show up at the awards ceremony along with the gala afterwards if the nomination proves fruitful. I have first dibs to dance with Rassah, and I hope somebody remembers to bring a goat.

No need for theymos to check the logs, for whatever been recently send via PM to Josh, I will confirm, being the dishonest guy I am and all. That includes the one in the OP.

Yep, Josh is so correct. I deserve the scammer tag for currently breaking a promise of sending $200 for I is so dishonest. Nevermind the fact that I've never scammed a single satoshi from anybody, nor have or will even think of doing such. Yet, I'm currently out over $100K due to this Bitcoin thingy, $500+ of which pertaining to three hero members on this forum who've ordered custom tooled leather ware from my brother-in-law and never paid me, but I paid Martin. To this day they have yet to reply to my emails and PMs, but I wouldn't even think of ratting out their names, let along request scammer tags, of which no longer exist on this forum. But I digress, for that's neither here nor there.

I also confirm that what Josh has stated about it first being a $100 promise, converted to a $200 one is true, and the post was not deleted because I'm not crazy...that would've lowered my post count allowing some other to past me by. Thus, Josh was mistaken^TM when he penned his thinking that a post of mine may have gone AWOL.

I believe that it is so kind of Josh to offer up himself as a new toy for me to play with, even going so far as to creating a special thread for the occasion for all to read and enjoy. As a special perk to his obligations at BFL, he gets to do such on company time on Sonny K.'s (oops! wrong guy) dime. I have no way in knowing, but maybe he's doing such on his breaks or just passing time while waiting for the phone call from the FCC informing BFL that all systems are go.

I received a PM from a kind fellow Bitcoiner offering up to pay this debt. I haven't yet taking the time to reply to him, but I will be refusing his kind offer, for it's my obligation, one of which I will have no problem fulfilling--on my terms.

That said, I'll cave! I will be donating the $200 to a charity of BFL's choice in the future, for doing such in the past is too late. I will first recheck my posts to make sure that I do so within the specific time frame that I promised to do it in, that's if Josh didn't have the mods remove it because it was incorporated in some post he wanted deleted for being off-topic.

As the time approaches for me to dole out the dough, I will first set up some trust fund accompanied with a Bitcoin address so that I'll be able to accept donations to augment the pool. One could argue that this is akin to the sauce/goose/gander idiom.

Sonny: Josh, why are you crying?
Josh: He's...he's...playin' me! And I...I...always...win, but...
Sonny: Take it easy, bro! You just need a vacation.
Josh: May...be. Where?
Sonny: Got a conference coming up, and you'll be manning the booth. Sadly, once again we won't be mentioned on any of the official flyers, but you don't see me crying.
Josh: You's the bestest!
Sonny: I know! Now, suck my dick.

I can't see how awarding you with a scammer tag would be of benefit to anyone. It would just devalue the scammer tag.

Not keeping a commitment, now that's going to take a hit on your integrity.

A hit on his integrity? among who, beggers and bums? I certainly don't think any less of him

[Inedible]

A hit on his integrity? among who, beggers and bums? I certainly don't think any less of him

Why doesn't someone who doesn't keep their commitments not bother you?

[Minor Miner]

Phinnaeus, was a date set for the payment date?

are you implying that since a hard date was not set by josh to donate 1000btc to charity that josh is free to do it "when hell freezes over?"

[moiraine]

I love the scam accusations section, it's like the new reddit for me.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Welcome to dramatalk, where the scammer tags don't matter and everything is illegal

I want to thank Phin for always being absolutely ridiculous in his characteristic deadpan manner. I imagine if held at gunpoint, he would begin to talk about some failed deal involving 3 laptops and half a duck.

It'll be a 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 duck.

Phinnaeus, was a date set for the payment date?

Yes. In the future.

Nice attempt as deflecting people away from the fact that you blatantly stated you would not honor a commitment you made.  No one cares about your red herrings or how piss poor of a decision maker you are or that you lost $100k out of your own stupidity.  

This thread is about how you are trying to weasel out of your commitment to donate $200 once certain conditions were met, which they have been.  If you want to setup a fund, by all means, please do so... I don't care. It's not about the $200, it's about the fact that you're a dishonest person at your core and you provide nothing positive to the bitcoin community.  You are a parasite and an attention whore; the only thing that matters to you is how much attention you get, not what effects your attention seeking have on your victims.

You even prove my point in this post: You wouldn't want to delete a post because it would lower your post count and someone would pass you by!  Yep, that's an important reason to have a high post count.  It's all about attention for you, I understand that.  It doesn't matter who you hurt in the process, so long as you get the attention, right?

I'm not deflecting. I'm caving.

Deflecting is when asked about FCC certs but avoiding the question. Or asking about Sonny K. of whom you claimed to have met but have yet produced.

Are you sure you're not looking in a mirror while you're posting on this wonderful thread?

Remind me to never go fishing with you, for you always take the bait. I baited you to start this thread, and baited you again to comment on my post count comment. I suggest you move to where there's more oxygen in the water unless, of course, it's a mercury issue.

It doesn't matter who you hurt in the process, so long as you get the attention, right?

WTF! Who am I hurting in the process while I'm amassing all this attention for myself?

[Inedible]

Phinnaeus, was a date set for the payment date?

are you implying that since a hard date was not set by josh to donate 1000btc to charity that josh is free to do it "when hell freezes over?"

I'm suggesting that I doubt anyone would be particularly upset if a commitment wasn't kept to someone else who seems to not understand what a commitment is.

[r3wt]

A hit on his integrity? among who, beggers and bums? I certainly don't think any less of him

Why doesn't someone who doesn't keep their commitments not bother you?

because lifes a bitch, people lie, stfu and get over it. aint gonna do you a bit of good to sit and dwell on it. <<this is the hardest lesson for most people to learn in life and the sooner you do the better you'll be. You'll learn to rely on yourself instead of relying on everyone else.

[Minor Miner]

Phinnaeus, was a date set for the payment date?

are you implying that since a hard date was not set by josh to donate 1000btc to charity that josh is free to do it "when hell freezes over?"

I'm suggesting that I doubt anyone would be particularly upset if a commitment wasn't kept to someone else who seems to not understand what a commitment is.

touche.

[r3wt]

touche.

I assume that's either a typo or someone switched the t and the d on your keyboard

[Inedible]

A hit on his integrity? among who, beggers and bums? I certainly don't think any less of him

Why doesn't someone who doesn't keep their commitments not bother you?

because lifes a bitch, people lie, stfu and get over it. aint gonna do you a bit of good to sit and dwell on it. <<this is the hardest lesson for most people to learn in life and the sooner you do the better you'll be. You'll learn to rely on yourself instead of relying on everyone else.

Who's dwelling and who's relying on anyone else?

[Inedible]

touche.

I assume that's either a typo or someone switched the t and the d on your keyboard

Can't tell if this is sarcasm or not but the impression I'm left with is you're not good with nuance or subtext.