Loredo (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2013, 02:19:30 PM |
|
Is it just me, or does something seem cart ahead of horse, about all of this? BFL has a functional chip: no question. But even in Jally's, there was redesign required. They shipped a couple (?) SC prototypes in the last weeks (two weeks?), but unless I've missed something, true mass production is not yet occurring.
To their credit, they now release the schematics for the SC, which they've been working on for 12 months or more, and the community embraces that as the Holy Grail that will lead to functional DIY equipment from the chips.
My question is this: if BFL is stuck in some technical mud on the SC design, a year up the experience curve, how can the DIY community feel secure in using the furnished road maps to build out?
Personally, if I had a dog in the ring, before I'd commit, I'd want to see some eyeballs on the documents from some who can bring to the BFL DIY what BKKcoins represents to the Avalon DIY's: someone with unquestioned technical credentials, and no personal agenda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
DobZombie
|
|
June 17, 2013, 03:23:11 PM |
|
wot?
|
Tip Me if believe BTC1 will hit $1 Million by 2030 1DobZomBiE2gngvy6zDFKY5b76yvDbqRra
|
|
|
ScaryHash
|
|
June 17, 2013, 03:35:24 PM |
|
Would probably be a good idea.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinorama
|
|
June 17, 2013, 03:38:35 PM |
|
wot?
He wants someone with 'a quarter' to give the schematics a once over, because BFL's own irrational behaviour doesn't exactly inspire him with confidence...
|
Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful BTC Address ---> 1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
|
June 17, 2013, 05:15:02 PM |
|
Is that open source hardware?
|
|
|
|
titomane
|
|
June 17, 2013, 05:26:00 PM |
|
BFL has done very bad things in the past year. Who guarantees that will not last.
|
|
|
|
Loredo (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:02:19 PM |
|
Is that open source hardware?
You mean BFL? Of course not; they're a for-profit, and, up-to-now, proprietary IP company. But it they're going to sell chips, IMO they need to provide detailed guidance on enabling circuits and share their experiences -good and bad- in PCB design issues. Otherwise, why buy the chips?
|
|
|
|
minternj
|
|
June 17, 2013, 06:08:55 PM |
|
laredo they did this weekend.
|
|
|
|
zamazama
|
|
June 17, 2013, 08:22:43 PM |
|
How can they sell chips when all the pre-orders are not even half filled??
Everyone suddenly selling off chips makes me think something better is around the corner.
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2013, 08:41:11 PM |
|
How can they sell chips when all the pre-orders are not even half filled??
Everyone suddenly selling off chips makes me think something better is around the corner.
They have plenty of chips, but they ran into board issues, and their lack of boards is why they can't ship. They've already shipped 2 months worth of Jalapenos, but almost zero Singles.
|
|
|
|
eroxors
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Think. Positive. Thoughts.
|
|
June 17, 2013, 08:47:43 PM |
|
I am very skeptical... the delays make me think that it would be more difficult for the board designer to create a working prototype and their business position in general makes me worry that the chips might not happen or might happen 100, 200, 300 days too late. Is this a strategy to fund their current operations a bit longer? How deep in the red are they?
If some reputable forum members decided it was worth the risk and went down that road (like the steamboat/bkk group buy) I would be interested, but I doubt they will given BFL's history.
|
|
|
|
|