Bitcoin Forum
August 08, 2022, 08:13:04 PM
 Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
 News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 Home Help Search Login Register More
 Pages: [1]
 Author Topic: luck.. what's wrong with this math?  (Read 817 times)
mdude77
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001

 November 13, 2017, 06:48:01 PM

I'm overlooking something here, and I'm sure someone can point out to me where my error is.

If a pool finds a block on average every 60 minutes ("100%" luck), then...

1. If that pool finds a block in 1 minute, it's 60x better than expected?
2. Therefore, at the opposite end of luck, 60x worse than expected is 3600 minutes?
3. However the average of 1 and 3600 isn't 60.

Is #3 the flawed premise, or is something wrong with #1 and #2?  Or all the above?

Thanks.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1659989584
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1659989584

Ignore
 1659989584

1659989584
 Report to moderator
1659989584
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1659989584

Ignore
 1659989584

1659989584
 Report to moderator
1659989584
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1659989584

Ignore
 1659989584

1659989584
 Report to moderator
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 4088
Merit: 2900

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

 November 13, 2017, 06:52:21 PM

If a pool finds a block on average every 60 minutes ("100%" luck), then...

1. If that pool finds a block in 1 minute, it's 60x better than expected?
2. Therefore, at the opposite end of luck, 60x worse than expected is 3600 minutes?
3. However the average of 1 and 3600 isn't 60.

The average shouldn't be 60, because on average it took you 1800.5 minutes each to find the 2 blocks.

If it took 1 minute for the first and 119 minutes for the second, then you'd be looking at 100% luck.

 ..Stake.com.. ▄████████████████████████████████████▄   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██    ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██     ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ PlaySmarter ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  ██     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌█    ██████████    █ ▐  ██   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ ██     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌█                  █▐ ██                  █▐▐▌█                  █▐█▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ Leading Crypto Sports Betting&&&&& Casino Platform ▄▄█████████▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄██         ▐█▌         ██████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████████████▄███████████▄███████████▀    █████████████    ▀█████       ███████████       ██▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀▀███████         ███████▀▀█████▄       ▄█████▀▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ ..PLAY NOW..
mdude77
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001

 November 13, 2017, 06:57:15 PM

If a pool finds a block on average every 60 minutes ("100%" luck), then...

1. If that pool finds a block in 1 minute, it's 60x better than expected?
2. Therefore, at the opposite end of luck, 60x worse than expected is 3600 minutes?
3. However the average of 1 and 3600 isn't 60.

The average shouldn't be 60, because on average it took you 1800.5 minutes each to find the 2 blocks.

If it took 1 minute for the first and 119 minutes for the second, then you'd be looking at 100% luck.

Okay, that means #1 and #2 are invalid.

120 minutes is 2x as long 60 minutes.
30 minutes is 1/2 as long as 60 minutes.

Why isn't a block in 1 minute 60x better than expected?

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
QuintLeo
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030

 November 14, 2017, 11:04:43 PM

The issue isn't that 1 or 2 are invalid, the issues is the mathematics of calculating an average.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
 Pages: [1]
Jump to: