Bitcoin Forum
December 14, 2024, 11:45:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Solo each rig or pool  (Read 1902 times)
Mazakguy (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 21, 2013, 07:14:43 PM
Last edit: June 22, 2013, 12:40:03 AM by Mazakguy
 #1

hello all,

Looking for opinions on this.

Say you 4 mining rigs and want to solo mine.

 Is it better to point each one at the client, or make a private pool to point at the client.

It seems to me it would be better to do the private pool so the rigs don't work against eachother.

Is that how it works?

Just wondering, and yes I know 4 rigs is not much to solo mine, but wondering how the probabilitys work out.

Anyone know?

Edit:

I think I didn't state it clearly. My bad.

I mean having each rig point at MY bitcoin-qt, each rig solo mining by itself.

OR making my own pool with just MY rigs, and pointing the pool at MY bitcoin-qt, basicly solo mining with my OWN pool.

Maybe that states it better. Sorry for the mix-up Huh
farlack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1310
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 21, 2013, 09:16:49 PM
 #2

Probabilities work out instead of getting .01 bitcoin all the time, you get 25 every once and a while.
True___Blue
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 354
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 21, 2013, 10:32:53 PM
 #3

Probabilities work out instead of getting .01 bitcoin all the time, you get 25 every once and a while.

How can you calculate the probabilities. I have 300 Mhash and I was thinking its not enough to solo mine on btc but probably enough to solo mine on some altcoins.

legitnick
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 21, 2013, 11:50:10 PM
 #4

I would go with a pool, more easy and simple.

5 BITCOIN RAFFLE GIVEAWAY
"I dont lift" - Lord Furrycoat
bcpokey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 12:19:24 AM
 #5

Probabilities work out instead of getting .01 bitcoin all the time, you get 25 every once and a while.

How can you calculate the probabilities. I have 300 Mhash and I was thinking its not enough to solo mine on btc but probably enough to solo mine on some altcoins.

I still use http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/old_calculator.php to calculate probability

300MH/sec would have a 50% probability of finding a block after hashing continuously for 2221 days, 5 hours, 54 minutes (roughly 6 years) at current difficulty.
True___Blue
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 354
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 22, 2013, 04:16:46 AM
 #6

Probabilities work out instead of getting .01 bitcoin all the time, you get 25 every once and a while.

How can you calculate the probabilities. I have 300 Mhash and I was thinking its not enough to solo mine on btc but probably enough to solo mine on some altcoins.

I still use http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/old_calculator.php to calculate probability

300MH/sec would have a 50% probability of finding a block after hashing continuously for 2221 days, 5 hours, 54 minutes (roughly 6 years) at current difficulty.
Sweet! See you suckas in 6 years! 


  Grin  but really thanks. its a helpful site

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 07:46:30 AM
 #7

Probabilities work out instead of getting .01 bitcoin all the time, you get 25 every once and a while.
once and a while= never  Grin
unless you have a very large farm(not of gpu)
Perseus353
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 11:18:15 PM
 #8

But it's a serious question: what would -- at present difficulty level -- be a reasonable minimal level of hashing power, to make solo mining viable?

1CkV1H1CA67CjpG5QMxEgVU9tNto51DBHd
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 11:21:45 PM
 #9

Probabilities work out instead of getting .01 bitcoin all the time, you get 25 every once and a while.
once and a while= never  Grin
unless you have a very large farm(not of gpu)

or good luck...

donations not accepted
dakiller
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 174
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 26, 2013, 07:20:42 AM
 #10

But it's a serious question: what would -- at present difficulty level -- be a reasonable minimal level of hashing power, to make solo mining viable?
Comes down to how long are you willing to wait between finding blocks. I'd think that a block every 2 days would be what you want, that is 0.0035% of the network, at 197Th now, about 680Gh.
Meni Rosenfeld
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1054



View Profile WWW
June 26, 2013, 07:38:05 AM
 #11

It seems to me it would be better to do the private pool so the rigs don't work against eachother.

Is that how it works?
No. You can simply point all your rigs to your instance of bitcoin-qt and it will know to give different work units to each rig.

1EofoZNBhWQ3kxfKnvWkhtMns4AivZArhr   |   Who am I?   |   bitcoin-otc WoT
Bitcoil - Exchange bitcoins for ILS (thread)   |   Israel Bitcoin community homepage (thread)
Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems (thread, summary)  |   PureMining - Infinite-term, deterministic mining bond
Perseus353
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 26, 2013, 12:05:42 PM
 #12

But it's a serious question: what would -- at present difficulty level -- be a reasonable minimal level of hashing power, to make solo mining viable?
Comes down to how long are you willing to wait between finding blocks. I'd think that a block every 2 days would be what you want, that is 0.0035% of the network, at 197Th now, about 680Gh.

Interesting -- so if someone has two BFL minirigs it could be worth it.

1CkV1H1CA67CjpG5QMxEgVU9tNto51DBHd
Felipeo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 262


EOSABC


View Profile
June 26, 2013, 10:15:28 PM
 #13

I would go with a pool, more easy and simple.

+1

◆Telegram  ♠️ ♣️ ♥️ ♦️    www.eosabc.io   ♦️ ♣️ ♥️ ♠️  ◆Whitepaper
♠️   EOSABC redefine games with blockchain   ♠️
♥️  Win EOS on eosabc.io Everyday    ♥️
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 26, 2013, 10:56:26 PM
 #14

But it's a serious question: what would -- at present difficulty level -- be a reasonable minimal level of hashing power, to make solo mining viable?
Comes down to how long are you willing to wait between finding blocks. I'd think that a block every 2 days would be what you want, that is 0.0035% of the network, at 197Th now, about 680Gh.

Interesting -- so if someone has two BFL minirigs it could be worth it.

Yes, if you had 2 x 1.5TH/s = 3 TH/s you would currently be finding on average 1 or 2 blocks per day...

donations not accepted
Jaymax
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 11:10:17 AM
 #15

Simple math:

Block are found (averaged) every nine minutes.  

There are ( [24 hours per day] x [60 mins per hour] ) / [9 mins per block] = [160 blocks per day].

Therefore: ( [Network hashrate] / [Your hashrate] ) / [160 blocks per day] = [Payout days per block]

So if you've got e.g. 2x 60 GH/s BFL boxes on order, and you figure the network will be running at ≲ 400 TH/s when you get them, solo mining should return (initially)

( [400000 GH/s] / [120 GH/s] ) / [160 blocks per day] ≅ [21 days per block] (average)

Which, to me, is better than having a percentage skimmed of the top, but your mileage may vary.  Obviously there's a real risk of serious bad luck meaning no payout for a year - but then pure chance could also result in scoring a block on say three consecutive days.
Moogle
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


KUPO!


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2013, 09:32:44 PM
 #16

Unless you got some serious hashing power dont even think about solo. 300 is unfortunately nothing anymore :-(

polarhei
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


Firing it up


View Profile
July 01, 2013, 12:25:39 PM
 #17

Pool for this as the total rate is very horrible. Next years will be more and more
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!