[ANN][ICO]CREDITS - New Blockchain for financial industry [HARDCAP REACHED!]

[Filmmmakerr]

So 1 Billion tokens @ $.20 a coin?? seems bit high.

[NakiRR]

It is not possible to create a block chain that meets the technology they are talking about with that money. Millions of dollars are needed for this type of block chain. The things they mentioned are excellent. But in order to get a strong product out, they need collect serious amount of money. I think they have not reached that potential yet.

Why? Don't you remember giant corporations like Amazon as example, which were started from scratch. I think it's possible.

[NakiRR]

So 1 Billion tokens @ $.20 a coin?? seems bit high.

It seems like you didn't even read any info about this project but already asking a questions.

[seek4dream]

If you click on the LI logo on the team's website, some do not link back to LinkedIn.

Sergey Fedunishin, Anna Karasevich, Burkova Marina, Anton Ermakov, Dmitriy Pecherkin, Igor Korneev and more do not have a correct link to their LinkedIn profiles from their website.  https://credits.com/en/home/team   The links go back to their team page.

And why does a team need so many managers/directors? Almost everyone is a manager or director of some sort. I don't see the reasoning here.

Irrelevant stuff if you look those managers,cto etc are having blockchain development experience.What we should focus on Alpha version,github and is it actually 200K+ TPS or not in alpha version.

Yes, I agree. Alpha is make or break

I agree that they should release alpha version as promised.
In that case, I am in.

[cerealcreep]

If you click on the LI logo on the team's website, some do not link back to LinkedIn.

Sergey Fedunishin, Anna Karasevich, Burkova Marina, Anton Ermakov, Dmitriy Pecherkin, Igor Korneev and more do not have a correct link to their LinkedIn profiles from their website.  https://credits.com/en/home/team   The links go back to their team page.

And why does a team need so many managers/directors? Almost everyone is a manager or director of some sort. I don't see the reasoning here.

Irrelevant stuff if you look those managers,cto etc are having blockchain development experience.What we should focus on Alpha version,github and is it actually 200K+ TPS or not in alpha version.

Yes, I agree. Alpha is make or break

I agree that they should release alpha version as promised.
In that case, I am in.

It's pretty simple for me. No successful Alpha, I am not investing.

[deppil90]

That's really awesome that financial transactions can be made without a middleman. but whether this guarantee will create quality in the future, I hope this platform will continue to move forward

[TMoney508]

Hi Credits Team,

I applied for the white list Thursday night. It is now Sunday. Just wondering how long it usually takes to get white listed and will I still be able to before to opening of the ICO?

Thanks!

[victor br]

I don't get the 60% token allocation during the ICO. If 1 ETH = 5,000 CS and ETH as of now at $1,180 => ICO price of $1,180/5,000 = $0.236 per CS. With a hard cap of 20m => $20m / $0.236 = 84,745,763 CS which in turn represents some 8.47% of the total token number of 1bn. So a far cry from the 60% mentioned. And this is disregarding the $3m raised in the pre-ICO. This is a critical part of my evaluation model, so please what am I not getting here? Will the rest, i.e. some 500,000,000 tokens be burned to reach the 60%?

 Its odd that they’d allocate 600m tokens when their hard cap only allows ~84.7m tokens to be sold. Why do you think they’d do this?

[novaprime]

I don't get the 60% token allocation during the ICO. If 1 ETH = 5,000 CS and ETH as of now at $1,180 => ICO price of $1,180/5,000 = $0.236 per CS. With a hard cap of 20m => $20m / $0.236 = 84,745,763 CS which in turn represents some 8.47% of the total token number of 1bn. So a far cry from the 60% mentioned. And this is disregarding the $3m raised in the pre-ICO. This is a critical part of my evaluation model, so please what am I not getting here? Will the rest, i.e. some 500,000,000 tokens be burned to reach the 60%?

 Its odd that they’d allocate 600m tokens when their hard cap only allows ~84.7m tokens to be sold. Why do you think they’d do this?

I think you should join the telegram of the project to solve this problem because for me they will definitely have a good plan for early investors to make better profits. Only a few days will the project officially begin and we should calmly resolve everything because the potential of this project is huge.

[Apekool]

I don't get the 60% token allocation during the ICO. If 1 ETH = 5,000 CS and ETH as of now at $1,180 => ICO price of $1,180/5,000 = $0.236 per CS. With a hard cap of 20m => $20m / $0.236 = 84,745,763 CS which in turn represents some 8.47% of the total token number of 1bn. So a far cry from the 60% mentioned. And this is disregarding the $3m raised in the pre-ICO. This is a critical part of my evaluation model, so please what am I not getting here? Will the rest, i.e. some 500,000,000 tokens be burned to reach the 60%?

 Its odd that they’d allocate 600m tokens when their hard cap only allows ~84.7m tokens to be sold. Why do you think they’d do this?

Hmm yes indeed weird.

If you invested during the pre-ico, taking into account the ETH price going up and not taking into account the 60% bonus, you would already have doubled your investment, or almost doubled.

If I calculate my amount of CREDITS bought back then and with the rate of 1 ETH = 5000 CREDITS, I almost doubled my investment. But indeed, not seeing a 60% bonus in CREDITS in my token wallet.

edit: the amount of CREDITS received corresponds exactly to the applied rate of 1 ETH = 5000 CREDITS at the moment of payment, no bonus added (yet).

Thanks for mentioning

[cerealcreep]

I don't get the 60% token allocation during the ICO. If 1 ETH = 5,000 CS and ETH as of now at $1,180 => ICO price of $1,180/5,000 = $0.236 per CS. With a hard cap of 20m => $20m / $0.236 = 84,745,763 CS which in turn represents some 8.47% of the total token number of 1bn. So a far cry from the 60% mentioned. And this is disregarding the $3m raised in the pre-ICO. This is a critical part of my evaluation model, so please what am I not getting here? Will the rest, i.e. some 500,000,000 tokens be burned to reach the 60%?

 Its odd that they’d allocate 600m tokens when their hard cap only allows ~84.7m tokens to be sold. Why do you think they’d do this?

This is explained in their telegram group's pinned message

[cerealcreep]

There is red flag here, Credits says Nitin Gaur (Director at IBM Blockchain Labs) is advisor, but when I check his linkedin, nothing about Credits. I even send message to him at Linkedin, asking his confirmation as advisor at Credits, he do not answer.

I also sent him an Inmail on LinkedIn

He replied and confirmed

[NakiRR]

There is red flag here, Credits says Nitin Gaur (Director at IBM Blockchain Labs) is advisor, but when I check his linkedin, nothing about Credits. I even send message to him at Linkedin, asking his confirmation as advisor at Credits, he do not answer.

And what do you want to say? Do you think that he must to answer you only because it's you?)) i will open your eyes now, popular people have thousands of messages in their SM channels, and they are really busy and can npt reply to everyone.

How do you check Credits's claim about advisors is valid. Actually, Nintin Gaur did reply me but he did not answer me directly, I quote his reply message: "Apologies for delayed response, I was at WEF in Davos. Please send a note to rpalma@cr.ibm.com for a quick call." I wrote email to this addree, no reply.

Do you think short reply such as "yes" takes how many seconds?

I give you an example, http://ewm.network is rasing an ICO, the team and adivisor stated on their website is more impressive than Credits, but it is scam>

  I will open you another one secret: its not him. in the best case that was his secretary or someone from staff, of it was a just robot. But in any case i don't want to hurt you, i just want ti say that many professionals can be advisors in many projects in the same time and they can just ignore common people with their obvious questions. such things we should check through our trusted people. (if there is no info about it in SM channels, but even if it is, we should recheck it). Hope you understand about what i'm telling you.

[NakiRR]

If you click on the LI logo on the team's website, some do not link back to LinkedIn.

Sergey Fedunishin, Anna Karasevich, Burkova Marina, Anton Ermakov, Dmitriy Pecherkin, Igor Korneev and more do not have a correct link to their LinkedIn profiles from their website.  https://credits.com/en/home/team   The links go back to their team page.

And why does a team need so many managers/directors? Almost everyone is a manager or director of some sort. I don't see the reasoning here.

Irrelevant stuff if you look those managers,cto etc are having blockchain development experience.What we should focus on Alpha version,github and is it actually 200K+ TPS or not in alpha version.

Yes, I agree. Alpha is make or break

I agree that they should release alpha version as promised.
In that case, I am in.

It's pretty simple for me. No successful Alpha, I am not investing.

Waiting an alpha too, a bit nervous, coz invested already on pre-sale stage  But at that time i didn't expect it so soon

[cerealcreep]

There is red flag here, Credits says Nitin Gaur (Director at IBM Blockchain Labs) is advisor, but when I check his linkedin, nothing about Credits. I even send message to him at Linkedin, asking his confirmation as advisor at Credits, he do not answer.

And what do you want to say? Do you think that he must to answer you only because it's you?)) i will open your eyes now, popular people have thousands of messages in their SM channels, and they are really busy and can npt reply to everyone.

How do you check Credits's claim about advisors is valid. Actually, Nintin Gaur did reply me but he did not answer me directly, I quote his reply message: "Apologies for delayed response, I was at WEF in Davos. Please send a note to rpalma@cr.ibm.com for a quick call." I wrote email to this addree, no reply.

Do you think short reply such as "yes" takes how many seconds?

I give you an example, http://ewm.network is rasing an ICO, the team and adivisor stated on their website is more impressive than Credits, but it is scam>

  I will open you another one secret: its not him. in the best case that was his secretary or someone from staff, of it was a just robot. But in any case i don't want to hurt you, i just want ti say that many professionals can be advisors in many projects in the same time and they can just ignore common people with their obvious questions. such things we should check through our trusted people. (if there is no info about it in SM channels, but even if it is, we should recheck it). Hope you understand about what i'm telling you.

I understand your point but I just had a conversation with one of the advisors on LinkedIn. It was not a bot. Whether or not it was him, given his LinkedIn profile, I am confident it was him.

[NakiRR]

There is red flag here, Credits says Nitin Gaur (Director at IBM Blockchain Labs) is advisor, but when I check his linkedin, nothing about Credits. I even send message to him at Linkedin, asking his confirmation as advisor at Credits, he do not answer.

And what do you want to say? Do you think that he must to answer you only because it's you?)) i will open your eyes now, popular people have thousands of messages in their SM channels, and they are really busy and can npt reply to everyone.

How do you check Credits's claim about advisors is valid. Actually, Nintin Gaur did reply me but he did not answer me directly, I quote his reply message: "Apologies for delayed response, I was at WEF in Davos. Please send a note to rpalma@cr.ibm.com for a quick call." I wrote email to this addree, no reply.

Do you think short reply such as "yes" takes how many seconds?

I give you an example, http://ewm.network is rasing an ICO, the team and adivisor stated on their website is more impressive than Credits, but it is scam>

  I will open you another one secret: its not him. in the best case that was his secretary or someone from staff, of it was a just robot. But in any case i don't want to hurt you, i just want ti say that many professionals can be advisors in many projects in the same time and they can just ignore common people with their obvious questions. such things we should check through our trusted people. (if there is no info about it in SM channels, but even if it is, we should recheck it). Hope you understand about what i'm telling you.

I understand your point but I just had a conversation with one of the advisors on LinkedIn. It was not a bot. Whether or not it was him, given his LinkedIn profile, I am confident it was him.

and...what did he tell you?

[Smitten_Semi_Cameroon]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF-P3blS38I
Suppoman one of the biggest youtubers in crypto space talking about 3 'HIGH POTENTIAL' CRYPTOCURRENCIES and CREDITS is one of them  

Who is Suppoman? lol, and what are the other 2 high potential coin that he mentioned for high return? Thanks

Suppoman really likes Credits ....  and I really love Suppoman.

Video link=>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF-P3blS38I <=Video link

"Smash up the likes, peeps, smash up the likes .... "    lol

[Karl Max]

For our arabic-speaking followers! Edlibre.com has published a great article about the difference between CREDITS and ETHEREUM and what benefits CREDITS has. CREDITS blockchain platform solves the key problems of ETHEREUM, that’s why CREDITS can be a new effective solution for business.
https://edlibre.com/difference-between-credits-and-ethereum-blockchain.html

[Karl Max]

Beware of scammers! It has come to our attention that certain individuals have begun using CREDITS name for their fraudulent activities. Don't send any money to anyone if they ask you to do so on behalf of CREDITS. Remember that CREDITS official email domain is @credits.com. If you have any doubts, please don't hesitate to double-check and ask questions at invest@credits.com

[Karl Max]

Kryptomoney.com has published an article about CREDITS blockchain platform. Kryptomoney reported on the differences from Bitcoin and Ethereum, CREDITS ICO details and the main parameters of the forthcoming ICO.

https://kryptomoney.com/latest-ico-credits/