Lauda, Sold bitcointalk accounts, Giving neg for others for same reason.

[actmyname]

False. More fallacies ≠ Worse argument.

Strong argument without fallacies + many fallacies  > Bad argument without fallaciesIf I make a strong point to which you are unable to respond but the debate continues and I begin to use ad hominem against you, my argument in summation is still strong.

Whichever side commits more fallacies does determine the strongest argument ≠ Whichever side commits more fallacies is the strongest argument

Nice try though.

Firstly, I did not argue the questionable point, "whichever side commits more fallacies is the strongest argument." Rather, I argued the opposite.

Secondly, the number of fallacies has no bearing on the number of strong arguments. They are independent of one another, for a strong argument relies not on a fallacy. Thus the strongest argument cannot be determined via the number of fallacies.

I do not see how you can state that you can determine the strongest argument purely through the number of fallacies committed by both sides.

[1715613262]

1715613262

[ibminer]

Well I certainly would love to know all of Lauda's alts and Quickseller's alts... and everyone else on the forum.
Everyone man up (or woman up) and start posting their alts and all of the accounts they control! I'll even take them in PM

I'll start... just this one.  

[ProspectorsPR]

So lauda is a account seller by birth?
Hmm..so where is hilarious scum? Who wish to keep such duchebags in his trust list?
I am so much disappointed by this lauda beheviour
If one is himself a scammer then he has no right to call other a scammer.

Go go quickseller, long live quickseller, long live kralle.

[Lauda]

I'll start... just this one.  

I can only respond to this with: "Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?". Unless you ask theymos to list your alts, any statements of anyone should be considered invalid. 

So lauda is a account seller by birth?

No.

If one is himself a scammer then he has no right to call other a scammer.

Ironic given OP, Quickseller and you are talking.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

So lauda is a account seller by birth?
Hmm..so where is hilarious scum? Who wish to keep such duchebags in his trust list?
I am so much disappointed by this lauda beheviour
If one is himself a scammer then he has no right to call other a scammer.

Go go quickseller, long live quickseller, long live kralle.

Lauda isn't a scammer, however.   Quickseller is, though he seems to have given up his scammy pursuits for the moment.   

Calling hilariousandco "scum" is not likely to win you any arguments or love here, and I would suggest you reflect on your own feedback, which tells me you're the scammer.  I love it when scammers bitch about legitimate negs and thereby call attention to themselves. Not that you probably care, but have another one on the house.

[ibminer]

I'll start... just this one.  

I can only respond to this with: "Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?". Unless you ask theymos to list your alts, any statements of anyone should be considered invalid.  

theymos is welcome to list my nonexistent alts, although I'm sure he has better things to do.  

[Quickseller]

I'll start... just this one.   

I can only respond to this with: "Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?". Unless you ask theymos to list your alts, any statements of anyone should be considered invalid. 

It is too bad I am asking for you to consent to theymos to verify your statement that you only have that one alt and your statement that you have never purchased nor sold accounts.

There is significant evidence that refutes these statements.

[Lauda]

Quickseller is, though he seems to have given up his scammy pursuits for the moment.  

Well, selling DT accounts to scammers isn't exactly a scam. Is it?  

I love it when scammers bitch about legitimate negs and thereby call attention to themselves. Not that you probably care, but have another one on the house.

There are legitimate reasons to permanently ban at least some scammers (e.g. those that have been tagged by multiple independent DT parties for quite some time).

theymos is welcome to list my nonexistent alts, although I'm sure he has better things to do.  

At least someone gets it.

There is significant evidence that refutes these statements.

There is zero evidence. Your brain can't parse things properly when it comes to me. When are you going to leave the forum as you said you would? Oh right, your words can't be trusted.

[Quickseller]

There is significant evidence that refutes these statements.

There is zero evidence. Your brain can't parse things properly when it comes to me. When are you going to leave the forum as you said you would? Oh right, your words can't be trusted.

The evidence is that you placed multiple bids to buy an account via auction and asked for a price quote for 10 accounts via an alt that is connected to you via blockchain evidence.

[Lauda]

The evidence is that you placed multiple bids to buy an account via auction

No. There is 1 valid bid which further confirms my assumption of both posts just being shitposts for post padding.

and asked for a price quote for 10 accounts via an alt that is connected to you via blockchain evidence.

A question is a question. Anything else?
I'm waiting for your alt Gorgonzolla to complain about this.

[BTCflower10]

Avoiding the Issue

Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?

[Vod]

Avoiding the Issue

Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?

I'd encourage Lauda and others to ignore idiots like this.  They don't stand behind their words, obviously.

[Quickseller]

Avoiding the Issue

Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?

I'd encourage Lauda and others to ignore idiots like this.  They don't stand behind their words, obviously.

I am curious to know how Vod would feel about Lauda having many accounts (more than 2), and buying and/or selling accounts. Do you think this would be okay?

[Vod]

Avoiding the Issue

Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?

I'd encourage Lauda and others to ignore idiots like this.  They don't stand behind their words, obviously.

I am curious to know how Vod would feel about Lauda having many accounts (more than 2), and buying and/or selling accounts. Do you think this would be okay?

Curiosity is healthy.  It promotes education.

[Quickseller]

Avoiding the Issue

Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?

I'd encourage Lauda and others to ignore idiots like this.  They don't stand behind their words, obviously.

I am curious to know how Vod would feel about Lauda having many accounts (more than 2), and buying and/or selling accounts. Do you think this would be okay?

Curiosity is healthy.  It promotes education.

You didn't answer my question.

Do you think it would be okay if Lauda had purchased and/or sold accounts in the past? (or is currently doing so).

Do you think it would be okay if Lauda had more than one alt? (he has claimed to have exactly one -- the one that he took the time to delete 3,000+ posts from).

[BTC-Graphicdesigns]

In the current Age of ICOs we should start our own ICO and collect BTC and ETH to then pay Theymos which in return will give us all off the alts of Lauda.

[Quickseller]

Avoiding the Issue

Why don't you want theymos proving Quickseller wrong about you?

I'd encourage Lauda and others to ignore idiots like this.  They don't stand behind their words, obviously.

I am curious to know how Vod would feel about Lauda having many accounts (more than 2), and buying and/or selling accounts. Do you think this would be okay?

Curiosity is healthy.  It promotes education.

You didn't answer my question.

Do you think it would be okay if Lauda had purchased and/or sold accounts in the past? (or is currently doing so).

Do you think it would be okay if Lauda had more than one alt? (he has claimed to have exactly one -- the one that he took the time to delete 3,000+ posts from).

Is there a reason why vod is declining to address this? Is Vod himself afraid of Lauda? Or is Vod declining to hold Lauda accountable because of their prior relationship?

[minifrij]

Is there a reason why vod is declining to address this?

Because people are bored of your stupid, biased behaviour.

[coindetective]

Having multiple accounts is illegal but joining your multiple accounts in one signature is not that's one moderator said. Maybe she caught you joining your other accounts in one signature campaigns, or the one you are selling is yours and not from others. Enough lets just be careful on what we are doing.

Where does it say it is illegal to sell an account?

I just went through META and Mprep FAQ, question number 18 says the following:
18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.

Discouraged is different from illegal and forbidden. How come some mods do not respect their own rules and punish people for selling accounts??

What am I missing here?

[Aventhe]

Having multiple accounts is illegal but joining your multiple accounts in one signature is not that's one moderator said. Maybe she caught you joining your other accounts in one signature campaigns, or the one you are selling is yours and not from others. Enough lets just be careful on what we are doing.

Where does it say it is illegal to sell an account?

I just went through META and Mprep FAQ, question number 18 says the following:
18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.

Discouraged is different from illegal and forbidden. How come some mods do not respect their own rules and punish people for selling accounts??

What am I missing here?

You are exactly right. If it was illegal people would be banned for it, but it doesn't happen.

Once again for the 10,000th time: the trust system is a whole lot different to the forum rules. Lauda gives out negative trust just because she/he himself doesn't not trust you.
Why would you even need to buy/ sell forum accounts?