[Closed] JIT Group Buy #7 1045+ ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units

[twitami1]

There still a buy going (dont want to read thru all 18 pages), and can I use Coinbase to pay from (ie, can I sign or whatever)?

Thanks!

[sf2]

 

[fewerlaws]

Hi I made a mistake on my sending address in my previous post.  It was 1DSC1vY2BNjPb6GZf6kKtbuDMZABYjEUht , and I sent you payment for 10 USB miners, along with a PM that contains a signed message.  It took me awhile to figure out the signed message thing.. (my first time sorry).

[Michail1]

This guy really needs an intermediary or partner to help him out or just organize the messages and questions presented

actually, they are organized 
I just provided the total

Organized in Date order? 

[CanaryInTheMine]

There still a buy going (dont want to read thru all 18 pages), and can I use Coinbase to pay from (ie, can I sign or whatever)?

Thanks!

read first post please.  coinbase=exchange = no message signing = RISK

[CanaryInTheMine]

This guy really needs an intermediary or partner to help him out or just organize the messages and questions presented

actually, they are organized 
I just provided the total

Organized in Date order? 

LOL no, in separate folders chronological wrt time. sorting is automatic haha

[CanaryInTheMine]

There still a buy going (dont want to read thru all 18 pages), and can I use Coinbase to pay from (ie, can I sign or whatever)?

Thanks!

You will have to wait for Group Buy #8

Coinbase does not have a way to sign message. I tried and can't be done. I suggest you learn from my mistake and don't try. You will need to download a wallet. I'm using QT which is slow to update (24 hours) but there are others.

i've asked coinbase to add a quick fund option (similar to bitinstant) they are working on it! )
perhaps i should ask them to add "signing" feature as well

[bitpop]

You people should really be using blockchain

[Troupster]

You people should really be using blockchain

Blockchain with the extension seems like the easiest way to xmit btc safely.

[CanaryInTheMine]

there is something I could use, and others too...
I need a browser plugin (let's start with chrome) that reads my message in the inbox, detects a signed message and tells me whether it's verified or not... copy/paste is wasting most of my time...  in this plugin I could setup an template/expression to tell it what pattern to look for when viewing a message in the inbox, things like ---start---, ---end--- etc...
thoughts? any takers?

[duquevalentino]

Hi,

Just to remember that I made 2 orders with the same value. In the list I can see only one.

Thanks again for providing this service.   

[jaslo]

Yay! Got in the OP -- canary's got my order.
Thanks man, sorry I got a little anxious there!

[nwfella]

Canary,

Could you confirm that you received payment for my order of 4 sticks when you get a chance?

-nwfella

[rethaw]

New thread to discuss this bookmarklet.

there is something I could use, and others too...
I need a browser plugin (let's start with chrome) that reads my message in the inbox, detects a signed message and tells me whether it's verified or not... copy/paste is wasting most of my time...  in this plugin I could setup an template/expression to tell it what pattern to look for when viewing a message in the inbox, things like ---start---, ---end--- etc...
thoughts? any takers?

I took a stab at making this a bit easier, fortunately other folks (bitcoinjs-lib and brain-wallet) have done all the hard work. You still have to copy-paste the message. There is definitely room for improvement!

It works like this:

1) Copy the message you want to check the signature for.
2) Select the signature.
3) Hit the bookmarklet and paste the message. Click OK.
4) Compare the address that gets alerted back (and written to the javascript console).

Here is the bookmarklet. I can't be liable for things exploding, and as stated above the code is from js-bitcoin and brain-wallet, MIT license.

Code:

javascript:var headID = document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0];
var newScript = document.createElement('script');
newScript.type = 'text/javascript';
newScript.onload=scriptLoaded;
newScript.src = 'https://gist.github.com/david4096/5883149/raw/c59756fc1f33b9fe39a4b3e951c59ae4e198b475/verify.js?'+Math.random();
headID.appendChild(newScript);
function scriptLoaded() {
message = prompt("paste message");signature = window.getSelection();address=verify_message(signature, message);alert(address);console.log(address)
}

You can test it out here:

1) Copy this message:

Code:

Refund for USB asic order to rethaw: 1Mx9CREkuBhPU6Q8yfDDp562uUtVu3y28i

2)Select this signature then click the bookmarklet:

Code:

IL8JvP0MSj1pQKJujlgVONsCqtgLhoETvs4fg+8iKRpj86UWEqn26ZDvhl6gmqShX3HYTENVmzwlBiA8vZlt9co=

3) Paste the message into the prompt and click OK.

4) Should alert (and write to console) address:

Code:

1JEz5Ex2VnD8cCYcLBvkeW6swGb3eSo2Kd

EDIT: tl;dr It works.

Things to add: find if the address exists in the current page.

[CanaryInTheMine]

cimpex; 10; 11.1618; 1DDBJr83XGhwXXjo6AVLVTF6C5A2xyDrm6

put me in for another 13

cimpex; 13; 13.21034; 1DDBJr83XGhwXXjo6AVLVTF6C5A2xyDrm6

total of 23, shipped together with the first 10.

//ahh damn, 10+ shouldn't be paid at once. sorry for that.
/// will order another 7 so i have a total of 3x10. I'm not sure about combined shipping at the moment. I will decide depending on the arrival of them.

cimpex; 7; 7.11326; 1DDBJr83XGhwXXjo6AVLVTF6C5A2xyDrm6

Now I have a total of 30 sticks + I'm correct now with the terms in your OP.

13.21034 + 7.11326 = 20.3236 (= 2x 10.1618)

to summarize:
cimpex; 10; 11.1618; 1DDBJr83XGhwXXjo6AVLVTF6C5A2xyDrm6
cimpex; 13; 13.21034; 1DDBJr83XGhwXXjo6AVLVTF6C5A2xyDrm6
cimpex; 7; 7.11326; 1DDBJr83XGhwXXjo6AVLVTF6C5A2xyDrm6

please ship them together. thanks!

OK

ahh, payment address from 2nd and 3rd is not the same as the first -> 2nd listed as ?? in OP.

cimpex; 10; 11.1618; 1DDBJr83XGhwXXjo6AVLVTF6C5A2xyDrm6
cimpex; 13; 13.21034; 1z7WpmmqAa2pFaw3ymvZPkpWPaF8qx4p9 - pm sig sent
cimpex; 7; 7.11326; https://blockchain.info/tx/d8dabdc3a642064d74e098d2f07bfe00aa8172ad44bda5a013316c25e9adbd12

do I have to sign all 3 of 3rd payment? feelin like an absolute noob at the moment.  

need signed message for:
cimpex; 13; 13.21034; 1z7WpmmqAa2pFaw3ymvZPkpWPaF8qx4p9 - pm sig sent
cimpex; 7; 7.11326; https://blockchain.info/tx/d8dabdc3a642064d74e098d2f07bfe00aa8172ad44bda5a013316c25e9adbd12

[tlr]

there is something I could use, and others too...
I need a browser plugin (let's start with chrome) that reads my message in the inbox, detects a signed message and tells me whether it's verified or not... copy/paste is wasting most of my time...  in this plugin I could setup an template/expression to tell it what pattern to look for when viewing a message in the inbox, things like ---start---, ---end--- etc...
thoughts? any takers?

Hah rethaw beat me to it by a few minutes, but mine's easier to use (if you can get people to send PMs with a specific format). It will iterate through your PMs looking for the format defined by the regex, then color the background green or red based on whether the signature is valid.

Code:

javascript:(function(){var REGEX, load;REGEX = /--\s*start\n(1[a-zA-Z0-9]+)\n--\n((?:.|\n)+)\n--\n([a-zA-Z0-9\+\/\=]+)\n/;load = function(url, callback) {  var script;  script = document.createElement("script");  script.onload = callback;  script.src = url;  return document.body.appendChild(script);};load("https://raw.github.com/brainwallet/brainwallet.github.com/master/js/bitcoinjs-min.js", function() {  return load("https://raw.github.com/brainwallet/brainwallet.github.com/master/js/bitcoinsig.js", function() {    var address, match, message, messageNode, messages, result, signature, _, _i, _len, _results;    messages = document.querySelectorAll(".personalmessage");    _results = [];    for (_i = 0, _len = messages.length; _i < _len; _i++) {      messageNode = messages[_i];      if (!((match = messageNode.innerText.match(REGEX)))) continue;      _ = match[0], address = match[1], message = match[2], signature = match[3];      result = verify_message(signature, message);      _results.push(messageNode.style.backgroundColor = address === result ? "green" : "red");    }    return _results;  });});})()

Source: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5883309

The current format is the following:

Code:

-- start
ADDRESS
--
MESSAGE
--
SIGNATURE
-- end

I'm happy to write a regex for whatever format you want though.

[rethaw]

It's difficult to link to bookmarklets within BBCode.

If you go here there's a little page to drag the bookmarklet above to the address bar.

http://bl.ocks.org/david4096/raw/5883334/

Same process:

1) Copy message to verify.
2) Select signature.
3) Click bookmarklet, paste message.
4) Compare output.

Hah rethaw beat me to it by a few minutes, but mine's easier to use (if you can get people to send PMs with a specific format). It will iterate through your PMs looking for the format defined by the regex, then color the background green or red based on whether the signature is valid.

tlr: If you're going to be up for a bit maybe you could add highlighting using some variation of the method I have (for the PM's he still has to go through).

EDIT: tlr, Do I smell CoffeeScript?

[CanaryInTheMine]

Stinky_Pete; 5; 6.2118; 1JiQq7bGemSztjTfqc11XT7snrwMFaEUbr

+1 BTC for International Postage

Thanks

there's no payment from your address that I can see: https://blockchain.info/address/1JiQq7bGemSztjTfqc11XT7snrwMFaEUbr

[tlr]

It's difficult to link to bookmarklets within BBCode.

If you go here there's a little page to drag the bookmarklet above to the address bar.

http://bl.ocks.org/david4096/raw/5883334/

Same process:

1) Copy message to verify.
2) Select signature.
3) Click bookmarklet, paste message.
4) Compare output.

Hah rethaw beat me to it by a few minutes, but mine's easier to use (if you can get people to send PMs with a specific format). It will iterate through your PMs looking for the format defined by the regex, then color the background green or red based on whether the signature is valid.

tlr: If you're going to be up for a bit maybe you could add highlighting using some variation of the method I have (for the PM's he still has to go through).

EDIT: tlr, Do I smell CoffeeScript?

Yup, I'm a CoffeeScript addict. I was hardcore JS guy for years but then I had to use CoffeeScript for a month and now I can't go back to JS.

I've got to go but feel free to modify mine: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5883309

[CanaryInTheMine]

all orders are now on OP.  please contact me if there's an issue.  I'm tired as hell, going to bed...