Recommended bitcointalk escrow services

[Blazed]

Not sure John K is really active enough to add to this list. I know he used to be the go to guy for escrows a few years back, but I never see him these days. The rest of the list looks good to me though.

[1714143987]

1714143987

[1714143987]

1714143987

[Timelord2067]

Slightly off topic, I was going to suggest this thread be listed on the [Overview] The one thread to link them all https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1217042.0 thread, but I see shorena has both locked the thread and has been offline for six weeks.

Does anyone know if they will be back soon?  Should an interim new "One Thread to link them all" style thread be started for changing threads?

[Quickseller]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

[TMAN]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

dont listen to this scumbag....

my thoughts is anyone who doesnt offer multi sig should be removed.. as they are dinosaurs in the new age..

[Hhampuz]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.

[TMAN]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.

BURN!!!!!

[aTriz]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.

rekt

[Lauda]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

Escrow scammer making recommendations for a list of escrow services, and lying while at it? Just pathetic.

[Timelord2067]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.

I had a feeling they'd deliver - well done people!

[monkeynuts]

In my time I have used nearly all of that list as escrows / or have traded with them and trust them
OgNasty
SebastianJu
minerjones
John K.   
Lauda   
Mitchell
Zepher
Lutpin

Thats not to say I dont trust the few I havent listed, just that I havent had dealings with them (yet   )

[Quickseller]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.

That is not the point. Lauda and minerjones (along with yahoonumbers) screwed up, and said they were going to impose losses as a result. The whole point of using escrow is to not allow losses resulting from someone absconding with funds.

Also, they did charge a fee, see this transaction, each of them "earned" around $215.


I am curious to know if anyone would be willing to use a particular escrow service if they knew there is a possibility a scammer would run away with funds, and the escrow agent would not cover losses when they failed to properly secure the money.

[Lauda]

Lauda and minerjones (along with yahoonumbers) screwed up, and said they were going to impose losses as a result.

Nope.

The whole point of using escrow is to not allow losses resulting from someone absconding with funds.

You can't protect what you don't hold. That was made clear. Your illiteracy sure ain't my problem.
Go away already, butthurt scammer; you *covered* enough by shamelessly scamming dozens of people. I do wonder why *certain individuals* didn't tag you.

[minifrij]

I am curious to know if anyone would be willing to use a particular escrow service if they knew there is a possibility a scammer would run away with funds

There is always a fair possibility that the escrow will attempt to fuck over their customers for personal gain, as shown by yourself and Master-P. I would hope that anyone using an escrow acknowledges this.

[TMAN]

I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.

You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.

That is not the point. Lauda and minerjones (along with yahoonumbers) screwed up, and said they were going to impose losses as a result. The whole point of using escrow is to not allow losses resulting from someone absconding with funds.

Also, they did charge a fee, see this transaction, each of them "earned" around $215.


I am curious to know if anyone would be willing to use a particular escrow service if they knew there is a possibility a scammer would run away with funds, and the escrow agent would not cover losses when they failed to properly secure the money.

did anyone order a cunt?? cos one keeps on coming in and posting in this thread...

utilizing multisig does help prevent scams..  maybe that is why OG refuses to use it?? are you saying that your favorite escrow is more likely to scam than someone using multi sig??

wow.. turning on your lover OG??

[hedgy73]

Not sure John K is really active enough to add to this list. I know he used to be the go to guy for escrows a few years back, but I never see him these days. The rest of the list looks good to me though.

Hi Blazed I sent John a message asking if his details were correct and he replied saying they were so assumed he was okay to be on the list .

[minifrij]

sperg

Can you fuck off?

[OgNasty]

FYI - I also escrow altcoins for double my rate (2%, same minimum applies). 

[Blazed]

Lauda and minerjones (along with yahoonumbers) screwed up, and said they were going to impose losses as a result.

Nope.

The whole point of using escrow is to not allow losses resulting from someone absconding with funds.

You can't protect what you don't hold. That was made clear. Your illiteracy sure ain't my problem.
Go away already, butthurt scammer; you *covered* enough by shamelessly scamming dozens of people. I do wonder why *certain individuals* didn't tag you.

LOL, LAUDA... you have other problems? You've robbed many people.You are a fucking scammer . You are using a stolen account and now do you advise others.

This "Escrow scammer" has robbed me off - funds that I need myself - funds that will be hard to replace . My intuitions is just telling me this is a different kind of scammer - yes I do believe his one - but a very slick, sly, cunniving, and manipulative clever and smart. The very first time when he asked me for funds - he asked me to send it straight by bank transfer, ( 2500 USD) then another 0.3 BTC...0.6 BTC... I am very angry !
Seller of service completes work ? Scam ! Deposit address....Escrow..all is scam !

He is just no ordinary "niagerian" scammer!

For more information, send me a PM.

BTW: DO NOT send anything to this user. Possibly stolen/hacked account ! See reference for details. All feedback is red for the last 8 months !

LAUDA- more than 100 red negative feedback = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=101872

Lauda is not a scammer and I have trusted them with plenty of coins etc...

[hedgy73]

FYI - I also escrow altcoins for double my rate (2%, same minimum applies). 

Thanks have updated your details

[mikespax]

philipma is currently inactive due to people trying to impersonate him