cdog
|
|
July 01, 2013, 10:01:16 AM |
|
Mike Caldwell’s Casascius Coin (here is a great vid of Mike “pressing” coins).
Id be interested in watching this, but the link doesnt show up for me. Im very interested in seeing BTC bills, and although I understand why llama is trying to corner the market, I dont like this approach at all. Just let free competition happen, and may the best physical bitcoins win. I think physical, multi-denomination BTC is a huge, necessary step forward towards mass adoption.
|
|
|
|
Birdy
|
|
July 01, 2013, 10:24:22 AM |
|
This is disgusting. What's this lame llama thinking?
I'll never buy a single bitbill. I hope more people boycott them as well.
This, patent trolling is on the same level as scammers imo.
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
July 01, 2013, 10:51:45 AM |
|
The day I decided that American patents (in IT at least) were ridiculous was when RLE was patented (back in the 80's).
Any student who sees a bunch of bytes like this: 0x40 0x40 0x40 0x80 0x80 will come up with the idea of: 0x03 0x40 0x02 0x80
anyone who thinks that such trivial stuff should even be "patentable" should probably consider patenting the English language itself (who knows maybe that will be next in the land where your own genes belong to some corporation).
|
|
|
|
apetersson
|
|
July 01, 2013, 11:39:01 AM Last edit: July 01, 2013, 01:37:09 PM by apetersson |
|
The day I decided that American patents (in IT at least) were ridiculous was when RLE was patented (back in the 80's).
in europe most software-only ideas are not patentable. the trouble unfortunately begins when you interact with the physical world, like with qr codes it suddenly becomes patentable. I think the whole patent system is broken and just shovels money to lawyers and hinders innovation. it would be great if we had some consensus on that in the bitcoin world. since the field is relatively new i forsee new a lot of patents on relatively obvious stuff (like this) being patented. maybe we should gather together and build a non-agression alliance with enough power to eliminate this threat.
|
|
|
|
mindtomatter (OP)
|
|
July 01, 2013, 01:04:34 PM |
|
Mike Caldwell’s Casascius Coin (here is a great vid of Mike “pressing” coins).
Id be interested in watching this, but the link doesnt show up for me. Im very interested in seeing BTC bills, and although I understand why llama is trying to corner the market, I dont like this approach at all. Just let free competition happen, and may the best physical bitcoins win. I think physical, multi-denomination BTC is a huge, necessary step forward towards mass adoption. You can read the full story (with updates) here which includes live links http://letstalkbitcoin.com/post/54309560858/bitbills-to-relaunch-cold-storage-patent-applicationYou can find the direct link to the video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NyzDY7NUOo
|
|
|
|
BitTrade
|
|
July 01, 2013, 01:35:28 PM |
|
Also keep in mind guys, contrary to what most believe, you can't patent an "idea" (such as the "idea" of physical / cold storage bitcoins). You can only patent a VERY specific system or design. So even if this patent application is accepted, it would be so limited in scope so as to make it next to meaningless. If it's too broad, it will not be enforceable. This is a clear case of patent bullying.
|
|
|
|
mindtomatter (OP)
|
|
July 01, 2013, 01:38:27 PM |
|
The patent is very inclusive of techniques, means, methods, mediums. It may be unenforceable, but it can be used as a cudgel against smaller players who might like to enter the market but don't want to risk an infringement lawsuit.
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
July 01, 2013, 01:46:02 PM Last edit: July 01, 2013, 03:10:38 PM by CIYAM Open |
|
Also keep in mind guys, contrary to what most believe, you can't patent an "idea" (such as the "idea" of physical / cold storage bitcoins).
Your premise is very true although in recent years patents in the USA have been mostly granted regardless of how broad they are (perhaps as a money-making exercise in itself by the authorities that grant them) so that patents for ideas *are* being granted and then later have to be battled (at a huge cost to a small business). The patent system really has no purpose in the modern world (it's original purpose was to encourage publication - we have the internet for that now) - the sooner it is scrapped the better (ditto for copyright - my other major bugbear).
|
|
|
|
canton
|
|
July 01, 2013, 02:32:30 PM |
|
If it's too broad, it will not be enforceable. This is a clear case of patent bullying.
Here's my concern: If BitBill is lucky enough to get their patent approved, it won't matter whether or not they can enforce their patent by winning in court. All they have to do is send letters demanding licensing fees from companies and individuals knowing full well that their targets won't be able to afford fighting the validity of the request in court. Here's a great (entertaining and informative) radio show on the topic of "patent trolls" and how they use overly broad patents to extort fees from startups: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/496/when-patents-attack-part-twoI'll of course be following this closely because my hobby project ( https://bitcoinpaperwallet.com) would be directly impacted by the approval of this patent, even though I'm not selling "currency" of any sort.
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
July 01, 2013, 02:39:25 PM |
|
What kind of legal exposure would a patent holder have for Bitbills that are used for illegal activities?
|
Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
July 01, 2013, 02:40:56 PM |
|
What kind of legal exposure would a patent holder have for Bitbills that are used for illegal activities?
Haha - great idea - forward on the patent application to the NSA (although probably not necessary as they would already know about it) and to FinCEN and let them reap the benefits!
|
|
|
|
|
RoadToHell
|
|
July 01, 2013, 03:05:16 PM |
|
It's a good thing that toilets were invented before the patent offices got all wacky. Otherwise we'd all be up sh*t creek.
|
Sam Spade: We were talking about a lot more money than this. Kasper Gutman: Yes, sir, we were, but this is genuine coin of the realm. With a dollar of this, you can buy ten dollars of talk.
|
|
|
smoothie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
|
|
July 01, 2013, 03:09:57 PM |
|
I'm trying to wrap my head around how you could patent embedding private keys into coins.
|
███████████████████████████████████████
,╓p@@███████@╗╖, ,p████████████████████N, d█████████████████████████b d██████████████████████████████æ ,████²█████████████████████████████, ,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y ██████ `████████████████` ██████ ║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████ ███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████ ███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████ ╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████ ██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─ ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀ ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀` ²²² ███████████████████████████████████████
| . ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM My PGP fingerprint is A764D833. History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ . LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS. |
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
July 01, 2013, 03:13:03 PM |
|
What kind of legal exposure would a patent holder have for Bitbills that are used for illegal activities?
Haha - great idea - forward on the patent application to the NSA (although probably not necessary as they would already know about it) and to FinCEN and let them reap the benefits! This will take the cross-hairs off of Satoshi since this is someone claiming to own a major part of the idea of Bitcoin.
|
Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
|
|
|
casascius
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1140
The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)
|
|
July 01, 2013, 03:23:02 PM |
|
I quickly read through the Claims section (which is the meat of any patent), but won't have time to look at the rest of the application until this evening. Claims 24, 30 and 31 look like they might contain new material. I think that all of the others can be countered with prior art. It will be interesting to see if the application detail backs up those claims with any substance.
I would think these three claims are nothing more than the same thing described in this post dated Aug 30, 2010 and its followups.
|
Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable. I never believe them. If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins. I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion. Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice. Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 01, 2013, 04:56:16 PM |
|
I'm trying to wrap my head around how you could patent embedding private keys into coins.
don't worry about this claim. it won't go anywhere. BitBills is a spoiled brat who missed out on the run up precisely b/c they didn't see it coming and now wants to capitalize on everyone else's success. won't happen.
|
|
|
|
Snail2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 01, 2013, 07:24:17 PM |
|
A Google find: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s1134.htmlAs I see any third party can enter a protest at the patent office. (I have no idea about the US patent law, so tell me if I'm telling stupid things.) Maybe TBF should intervene in this case.
|
|
|
|
mindtomatter (OP)
|
|
July 01, 2013, 07:30:43 PM |
|
Gavin commented on the foundation private forum and said he did not think it was the responsibility of the foundation to get involved. I don't neccesarily agree with that, I think if they're going to be activist in the community (lobbying) it makes sense for them to file protective patents on publicly derived concepts, which cold storage clearly is. This would prevent wasted expenditure on unsuccessful attempts to patent obvious parts of the Bitcoin structure.
|
|
|
|
Snail2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 01, 2013, 07:53:12 PM |
|
Agree. Offline wallets could be a great tool for promoting the usefulness of BTC and could help achieve a wider acceptance (as it looks similar to a well known bank note) so I think it's important to keep trolls away.
|
|
|
|
|