Bitcoin Forum
September 05, 2015, 02:16:53 PM *
News: New! Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.11.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: .  (Read 31009 times)
Justin00
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854



View Profile

Ignore
April 10, 2012, 12:02:58 PM
 #81

hmm i have been using version 6.0 in win32, have a  few addresses setup and what not.
I wanted to try your version of 5.3 but it ses my wallet is not compatible.

Not sure of the best approach to get it working. I imagine I can setup addresses in 5.3 and then use 6.0 to send the coins across and start using 5.3?? dunno if there is a better approach ?

thanks Smiley
7 Different Live Games
30 Live tables
Why look for fortune elsewhere? 200+ BTC Jackpot
400+ Slot Games
New Provably Fair BlackJack!
Unbeatable Loyalty Program!

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1441462613
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1441462613

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1441462613
Reply with quote  #2

1441462613
Report to moderator
1441462613
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1441462613

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1441462613
Reply with quote  #2

1441462613
Report to moderator
1441462613
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1441462613

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1441462613
Reply with quote  #2

1441462613
Report to moderator
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile

Ignore
April 10, 2012, 01:03:03 PM
 #82

next-test should be compatible with 0.6.0, and has Coin Control

Serenata
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251



View Profile WWW

Ignore
April 11, 2012, 10:06:54 AM
 #83

It should be mentioned elsewhere but what about an "Open Wallet..." function, for us keeping many different wallets?

BitcoinX.gr - Το ελληνικό στέκι του Bitcoin

My GPG Key
Justin00
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854



View Profile

Ignore
April 14, 2012, 07:36:11 AM
 #84

Thanks I will test her out.

next-test should be compatible with 0.6.0, and has Coin Control
check_status
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


Web Dev, Db Admin, Computer Technician


View Profile

Ignore
May 10, 2012, 05:44:56 PM
 #85

Is this still being developed?

For Bitcoin to be a true global currency the value of BTC needs always to rise.
If BTC became the global currency & money supply = 100 Trillion then ⊅1.00 BTC = $4,761,904.76.
P2Pool Server List | How To's and Guides Mega List |  1EndfedSryGUZK9sPrdvxHntYzv2EBexGA
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile

Ignore
May 10, 2012, 06:50:10 PM
 #86

Is this still being developed?
The latest version is still included in next-test.

Hawkix
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 510



View Profile WWW

Ignore
May 15, 2012, 06:07:47 AM
 #87

Please, could we get 0.6.2 with this "Coin control" merged in?

Donations: 1Hawkix7GHym6SM98ii5vSHHShA3FUgpV6
http://btcportal.net/ - All about Bitcoin - coming soon!
CIYAM
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1400


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW

Ignore
May 15, 2012, 06:15:30 AM
 #88

If the ability to specify a "change address" was also added to/included with coin control for release in the next version (i.e. 0.7.0) then I will gladly pay a bounty of 20 BTC to the author of the patch that is merged in (feel free to quote this for reference). Smiley


Cheers,

Ian.

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile

Ignore
May 15, 2012, 06:42:09 AM
 #89

Please, could we get 0.6.2 with this "Coin control" merged in?
The latest next-test is secure.

Ente
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456



View Profile

Ignore
June 19, 2012, 09:43:48 AM
 #90

Please, could we get 0.6.2 with this "Coin control" merged in?
The latest next-test is secure.

Can't wait for it to be merged in the mainline client!

Ente
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile

Ignore
June 19, 2012, 10:34:22 AM
 #91

Please, could we get 0.6.2 with this "Coin control" merged in?
The latest next-test is secure.

Can't wait for it to be merged in the mainline client!

Ente
+1

namecoin.org - freedom of information
blockchained.com ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
kano
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1470


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile

Ignore
June 19, 2012, 10:55:42 AM
 #92

... and fixed so you can specify transactions, not just addresses.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile

Ignore
June 19, 2012, 03:21:41 PM
 #93

Can't wait for it to be merged in the mainline client!
As of right now, that probably won't be happening. There's a lot of cleanup needed before it can be merged, and both coderrr and dooglus who were maintaining it seem to have lost interest. I've been rebasing it for next-test, and Diapolo is trying to clean up the GUI code, but it still needs someone to clean up the internals.

phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile

Ignore
June 24, 2012, 02:04:33 PM
 #94

... and fixed so you can specify transactions, not just addresses.

Coin Control is included in today's next-test release. Please give it a try!
As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient.
Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level.

is it not possible to achieve the same with coin control and a separate address for every transaction?

?

namecoin.org - freedom of information
blockchained.com ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile

Ignore
June 24, 2012, 02:06:43 PM
 #95

a feature that sets the transfer amount to all coins in the selected address minus fee would be nice. currently it's a pita to empty an address.


namecoin.org - freedom of information
blockchained.com ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
kano
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1470


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile

Ignore
June 24, 2012, 11:52:27 PM
 #96

a feature that sets the transfer amount to all coins in the selected address minus fee would be nice. currently it's a pita to empty an address.

It seems that knowing the fee in advance is beyond bitcoin.

This an issue that has been ignored or argued not possible for a VERY long time, every time it comes up, since there are some variables in the calculation that change over time I imagine is the excuse.

... what's that old timers term ... 2 phase commit ... not used much these days ...

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
kano
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1470


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile

Ignore
June 24, 2012, 11:59:11 PM
 #97

... and fixed so you can specify transactions, not just addresses.

Coin Control is included in today's next-test release. Please give it a try!
As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient.
Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level.

is it not possible to achieve the same with coin control and a separate address for every transaction?

?
So for the average joe's wallet that might want to use this to choose transactions or addresses, it's no good since you have to have done this from the start and always remember to do it that way?

My point being that your saying that this is only of use to people who have anonymity issues, rather than also for those who wish to have control over certain transactions
i.e. going one more level is as far as is possible with selecting sources for a transaction - and why not allow that? Why stop early?

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
Gavin Andresen
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652


Chief Scientist


View Profile WWW

Ignore
June 25, 2012, 12:45:17 AM
 #98

As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient.
Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level.
See the raw transaction API I've been working on, and please help try to break it-- it needs more testing.

The main motivation is to move forward with multisignature transactions, but it also lets you have complete control over the source(s) for a transaction.

How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
CIYAM
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1400


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW

Ignore
June 25, 2012, 06:53:02 AM
 #99

See the raw transaction API I've been working on, and please help try to break it-- it needs more testing.

The main motivation is to move forward with multisignature transactions, but it also lets you have complete control over the source(s) for a transaction.

This looks interesting - just one question after reading this document (as the word "change" does not appear in it at all) - will it be also possible to specify the *change* address with such "raw transactions" (in perhaps the sendrawtx command itself)?

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile

Ignore
June 25, 2012, 09:40:59 AM
 #100

a feature that sets the transfer amount to all coins in the selected address minus fee would be nice. currently it's a pita to empty an address.

It seems that knowing the fee in advance is beyond bitcoin.

This an issue that has been ignored or argued not possible for a VERY long time, every time it comes up, since there are some variables in the calculation that change over time I imagine is the excuse.

... what's that old timers term ... 2 phase commit ... not used much these days ...

I never understood why the fee calculation has to bee so complicated...  age of coins - wtf why?


namecoin.org - freedom of information
blockchained.com ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!