ARM processors with Mali Octacore - ignored by mining coders, why?

[QuintLeo]

My current single Vega 56 system eats a hair under 300 watts for the COMPLETE SYSTEM (that's probably 200-220 for the Vega) while mining Monero at about 1960 hash/sec - and I've not had the time to work on power optimisation, and Wattman makes it a PITA to do so IMO (I had it working with Afterburner for a while, but had a power outage and haven't been able to get it working again with AB).

 I dunno where your "15 Vegas for 6 kilowatts" is out of, should be closer to 30 even with POOR power optimisation - and I've seen claims of managing close to 1900 with 120 watts out of a Vega 56 with a "flash it with a Vega 64 BIOS then well-optimise it" setup.

 250-300 watts for a Vega 56 is WELL above it's rated TDP, though they run cool enough that you might be able to get there if you push TDP hard enough - but a lot of that wattage will be waste heat, they run faster when undervolted and don't need tons of power to max out their core clock.


 Can an ARM even mine ETH at all?
 I would not hold out a lot of hope for it on ZEC, they're a LOT lower performance than the i7 hardware some folks used to CPU mine ZEC in the early days and the hashrates on THOSE was low double-digits.
 Monero - they might have a prayer against a Vega if they can manage better than 10 hash per watt used ...... hmm, given all the "extra stuff" on the Snapdragon 835 that doesn't DO computing, how much DOES that thing eat - and how bloody much does it COST?

[NiHaoMike]

High end smartphones have never been profitable for mining - they cost way too much for the performance. Cheap smartphones like $20 Moto Es give way more performance per dollar for mining.

I have also tried mining earnhoney with a Pi 3. It is profitable when it runs, but it proved too unstable to be worth running.

[kuroman]

My current single Vega 56 system eats a hair under 300 watts for the COMPLETE SYSTEM (that's probably 200-220 for the Vega) while mining Monero at about 1960 hash/sec - and I've not had the time to work on power optimisation, and Wattman makes it a PITA to do so IMO (I had it working with Afterburner for a while, but had a power outage and haven't been able to get it working again with AB).

 I dunno where your "15 Vegas for 6 kilowatts" is out of, should be closer to 30 even with POOR power optimisation - and I've seen claims of managing close to 1900 with 120 watts out of a Vega 56 with a "flash it with a Vega 64 BIOS then well-optimise it" setup.

 250-300 watts for a Vega 56 is WELL above it's rated TDP, though they run cool enough that you might be able to get there if you push TDP hard enough - but a lot of that wattage will be waste heat, they run faster when undervolted and don't need tons of power to max out their core clock.


 Can an ARM even mine ETH at all?
 I would not hold out a lot of hope for it on ZEC, they're a LOT lower performance than the i7 hardware some folks used to CPU mine ZEC in the early days and the hashrates on THOSE was low double-digits.
 Monero - they might have a prayer against a Vega if they can manage better than 10 hash per watt used ...... hmm, given all the "extra stuff" on the Snapdragon 835 that doesn't DO computing, how much DOES that thing eat - and how bloody much does it COST?

Every single review on the internet rates RX Vega power consumption between 250 and above 300W for the an Overclocked 64 at full load, so unless you are really lowering your power limit to at least or around 70% I really want to see your system consuming under 300w (GPU AND CPU full load).  so even if we take a 350W conservative number by adding (system power, one system per 5 cards and divided)so we are on the same page. 6000/350= 17 cards not 30!!! so please check your math

Also other mistake you are doing is that you are assuming that the only usefull part of SoC is the CPU which is not, the easy way is obviously to use the CPU only but like I mentioned before a Tegra X1 from 2015 can achieve 1TFlops 16FP. there is no room for comparison here if The ARM SoC are fully optimised for mining software wise they'll beat RX Vegas in terms of efficiency, but the problem would the cost of making such a system that would not be worth it

A Snapdragon 835 in your smartphone consumes 2W to 2.5W, when I used 5W to have a marging even considering the boards power consumption for the nodes; so no

[QuintLeo]

Gaming reviews have NOTHING to do with mining usage.
Try looking at the various build-up reviews for the Vega FOR MONERO MINING USAGE.

For a specific related example, most of the reviews I have seen put "high load" power usage of a GTX 1070 ti in the 180-220 watt range - yet the MOST EFFICIENT mining point for those cards is 106 watts give or take a couple, and even folks that "push" them for higher hashrate rarely go higher than 145-150 range because the gains above that are TINY compared to the increase in power usage (my specific 1070 ti mining cards are currently set to 105 watts to keep total system draw under 6 amps on the system they are in).

Also, the Vega 64 pulls a lot more power IN GAMING USAGE than the 56 does, the 56 was deliberately designed by AMD to have a much lower TDP limit

 YOU need to check your ASSUMPTIONS, that's where you are messing up.

 Floating Point operations are 100% WORTHLESS for cryptocoin usage, which is 100% INTEGER operations.
 Another BAD ASSUMPTION you make, not a mistake on MY part.
 Would you also care to explain how "LTE16x" cell phone interface helps mining? Just for ONE example of the "not useful stuff for mining" on a Snapdragon 835.
 
 My "under 300 watt" measurement was made AT THE WALL on a Brand power meter while the system was actively hashing at 1950+ hash on Monero mining - and that was on a system that is NOT "power optimised" well, as I've never figured out how to get bloody Wattman to do a lot of the stuff I can do routinely in Afterburner like UNDERVOLT (Vega 56 cards LOVE to be undervolted, they tend to clock HIGHER with some undervolt as it lets them stay below the TDP easier). It is running a severely overkill Gold-rated power supply (Seasonic X-850) because that's what I had available when I put the system together, but the system is based on a FM2 motherboard with am AMD A10-7890k (which is NOT a low power APU) with the iGPU running the graphics for Win10, an HGST 3TB hd (system is also doing BURST mining) so the actual power draw of the SYSTEM as a whole would probably be about 275 watts (That model of PS usually pulls about 92% efficiency in the 30-50% load range).
 220 watts draw for the GPU is a PESSIMISTIC estimate, as I'm pretty sure the rest of the system is pulling 80-100 watts total NOT 50-60.

 Presuming an optimistic 2 watts, can a Snapdragon manage 20 hash on Monero?
 8 cores at 2 Ghz (ballpark average, I saw the "big/little" core split) in theory should manage more, but how much CACHE do they have on them - Monero wants ballpark 2 MB of CPU CACHE MEMORY per thread to run efficiently (and I can't find a spec anywhere that shows the amount of CPU cache on a Snapdragon).

 Then figure in the COST of the things - even *IF* they can mine efficiently, is it worth the COST of the things for whatever hashrate they achieve?
 THAT is the primary reason pretty much any SoC setup gets ignored for mining - even if it IS efficient in hash/watt, the sheer COST makes the time to achieve ROI end up being measured in YEARS.

[kuroman]

Gaming reviews have NOTHING to do with mining usage.
Try looking at the various build-up reviews for the Vega FOR MONERO MINING USAGE.

For a specific related example, most of the reviews I have seen put "high load" power usage of a GTX 1070 ti in the 180-220 watt range - yet the MOST EFFICIENT mining point for those cards is 106 watts give or take a couple, and even folks that "push" them for higher hashrate rarely go higher than 145-150 range because the gains above that are TINY compared to the increase in power usage (my specific 1070 ti mining cards are currently set to 105 watts to keep total system draw under 6 amps on the system they are in).

Also, the Vega 64 pulls a lot more power IN GAMING USAGE than the 56 does, the 56 was deliberately designed by AMD to have a much lower TDP limit

 YOU need to check your ASSUMPTIONS, that's where you are messing up.

 Floating Point operations are 100% WORTHLESS for cryptocoin usage, which is 100% INTEGER operations.
 Another BAD ASSUMPTION you make, not a mistake on MY part.
 Would you also care to explain how "LTE16x" cell phone interface helps mining? Just for ONE example of the "not useful stuff for mining" on a Snapdragon 835.
 
 My "under 300 watt" measurement was made AT THE WALL on a Brand power meter while the system was actively hashing at 1950+ hash on Monero mining - and that was on a system that is NOT "power optimised" well, as I've never figured out how to get bloody Wattman to do a lot of the stuff I can do routinely in Afterburner like UNDERVOLT (Vega 56 cards LOVE to be undervolted, they tend to clock HIGHER with some undervolt as it lets them stay below the TDP easier). It is running a severely overkill Gold-rated power supply (Seasonic X-850) because that's what I had available when I put the system together, but the system is based on a FM2 motherboard with am AMD A10-7890k (which is NOT a low power APU) with the iGPU running the graphics for Win10, an HGST 3TB hd (system is also doing BURST mining) so the actual power draw of the SYSTEM as a whole would probably be about 275 watts (That model of PS usually pulls about 92% efficiency in the 30-50% load range).
 220 watts draw for the GPU is a PESSIMISTIC estimate, as I'm pretty sure the rest of the system is pulling 80-100 watts total NOT 50-60.

 Presuming an optimistic 2 watts, can a Snapdragon manage 20 hash on Monero?
 8 cores at 2 Ghz (ballpark average, I saw the "big/little" core split) in theory should manage more, but how much CACHE do they have on them - Monero wants ballpark 2 MB of CPU CACHE MEMORY per thread to run efficiently (and I can't find a spec anywhere that shows the amount of CPU cache on a Snapdragon).

 Then figure in the COST of the things - even *IF* they can mine efficiently, is it worth the COST of the things for whatever hashrate they achieve?
 THAT is the primary reason pretty much any SoC setup gets ignored for mining - even if it IS efficient in hash/watt, the sheer COST makes the time to achieve ROI end up being measured in YEARS.

Everyone knows that Nvidia cards are much more efficient right now.
Your 300W load is only considering the GPU load. And like I said before even if you consider such figure You cannot reach the 30 you've mentioned that's simple math.
20Hash on monero is totaly possible an 835 in theory, neither the 835 or the X1 have 2MB of cache per core they have 2MB per 4 cores. but you are not factoring the GPU Side of thing
Like I said before the cost from random supplier is expensive, but if you can build your own board it can be interesting. It is hard to justify such a project considering that not only the miners and software is not efficient

as for  

Floating Point operations are 100% WORTHLESS for cryptocoin usage, which is 100% INTEGER operations.
 Another BAD ASSUMPTION you make, not a mistake on MY part.
 Would you also care to explain how "LTE16x" cell phone interface helps mining? Just for ONE example of the "not useful stuff for mining" on a Snapdragon 835.

There are always different version of these SoC for different markets for example when Nvidia or Qualcomm produce a SoC for embeded machines these SoC do not have said functionalities, and Again your forget each time about the GPU side of these SoC please check out the SDA835 (APQ8098) for example ! as for floating point calculation it's a correct way of comparing hardware especially when it comes to different platforms, since it doesn't not require platform optimisation and whatsnot.

[QuintLeo]

My "less than 300 watts" IS THE ENTIRE SYSTEM as I have already stated that's "AT THE WALL" on a system that has NOT been optimised for power consumption.
That figure is NOT "only considering the GPU load".
It's also a very NON-OPTIMAL setup in general - ONE non-optimized GPU in an old high-power-draw SINGLE CARD system.
It would be nice if you would pay attention and quit trying to prop up your strawman "THE GPU eats 250+ watts to mine with" argument with lies while ignoring presented FACTS.

The FACT is that 6 KW will power a lot closer to 30 Vega GPUs including total rig consumption - and possibly MORE than that - than your TOTALLY BS 17 claim.
If that "130 watt" TDP figure I've seen claimed on one "how to build it" site is correct, that would put a 4 card Vega rig right close to 600 watts - for *40* Vega GPUs in 6 KW including total system draw - while still respecting the widely reported issue of trying to get more than 4 Vegas mining Monero in a single system at high hashrates.

Does the 835 have a GPU that's useable for anything other than driving a tiny display?
Does it support OpenCL or CUDA?
If not, it IS useless for mining.

Comparing floating point capabilities is MEANINGLESS for cryptocoin work, as floating point does NOTHING to help cryptocoin work in any way shape or form.
There is a reason any RX 470 blows away the R9 280x on most cryptocoin work, even though the R9 280x does more than DOUBLE the FP64 work of any RX 470 - Floating Point is MEANINGLESS.
Again you insist on ignoring FACTS to try to prop up a strawman argument.


 Nvidia cards in general are more efficient - but there are exceptions, they're a tossup at best on ETH mining, they just aren't competative at all in Monero mining where Vega blows away the hashrate of ANY Nvidia card by a wide margin and has better hash/watt when both sides are well optimized, and outside of cryptocoin MINING as such the Vega 56 can very close to MATCH the keyrate of the GTX 1080 ti on Distributed.net RC5-72 work while soaking a little less power (much better on keyrate/$ when you can find the Vega 56 at close to MSRP, tossup on keyrate/watt).

 In many cases though, even where Nvidia cards are more efficient, they are NOT "much more efficient".

[kuroman]

My "less than 300 watts" IS THE ENTIRE SYSTEM as I have already stated that's "AT THE WALL" on a system that has NOT been optimised for power consumption.
That figure is NOT "only considering the GPU load".
It's also a very NON-OPTIMAL setup in general - ONE non-optimized GPU in an old high-power-draw SINGLE CARD system.
It would be nice if you would pay attention and quit trying to prop up your strawman "THE GPU eats 250+ watts to mine with" argument with lies while ignoring presented FACTS.

What facts you've presented ZERO Facts! while I've told you I can show every review of RX Vegas  on the internet Gaming / Productivity / AND Mining even taking into consideration the lowest power consuming vega of them all mining a Vega with it system CPU at Load you get 300W+, if you change the power limite to 70% downclock the gpu and with an Intel dual core pentium doing nothing you might get the figure you are mention, a Vega 64 don't even dream about it.
 

The FACT is that 6 KW will power a lot closer to 30 Vega GPUs including total rig consumption - and possibly MORE than that - than your TOTALLY BS 17 claim.
If that "130 watt" TDP figure I've seen claimed on one "how to build it" site is correct, that would put a 4 card Vega rig right close to 600 watts - for *40* Vega GPUs in 6 KW including total system draw - while still respecting the widely reported issue of trying to get more than 4 Vegas mining Monero in a single system at high hashrates.

Again what math are you even using Serisouly it's just a simple division !  and what aload of misinformation you are giving and I'm being nice.
Here bellow a fully optimised Vega 56 rig !

Snip!....



I have a 5 * 1080ti mining rig -


And a 4 * Vega56 mining rig -


Which together draw 1730W (who's counting )-

The Vega rig is consuming almost a 800W or a 1000W I forgot which which !! and this is a fully optimised rig

Here is another one 3xRX Vega 56 @ 600W without the CPU Mining ! (no BIOS Mod tho)

I mean the math is easy 6000w/350w = 17 cards unless you are really downclocking and setting a very low power limite unless you are not mining with CPU unless you are using 6 Cards or more per rig unless you are using platinum power supplies you won't increase the efficiency, if you do tho all this ! and with only Vega 56 No Vega 64 you might reach an optimal 180w per card or so! and then you might get to the 30 cards, this is A LOT of IFs

Does the 835 have a GPU that's useable for anything other than driving a tiny display?
Does it support OpenCL or CUDA?
If not, it IS useless for mining.

What tiny display ? it's not about the size it's about the computational power, most of modern smartphones have 1440p screens heck some have 4K screen and they run them no problem, also those gpus can power normal display via HDMI or WDMI no problem ! and yes the Adreno GPU on the Snapdragon runs OpenCL the full OpenCL 2.0  while the X1 from Nvidia runs Cuda actually it has 256 Cuda cores
Proof
https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2017/01/03/qualcomm-snapdragon-835-mobile-platform-power-next-generation-immersive
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adreno
http://www.nvidia.com/object/tegra-x1-processor.html

Comparing floating point capabilities is MEANINGLESS for cryptocoin work, as floating point does NOTHING to help cryptocoin work in any way shape or form.
There is a reason any RX 470 blows away the R9 280x on most cryptocoin work, even though the R9 280x does more than DOUBLE the FP64 work of any RX 470 - Floating Point is MEANINGLESS.
Again you insist on ignoring FACTS to try to prop up a strawman argument.

FP 64? No no one compares cards on FP 64 Unless they have very specific use for them, it's either 32 full precision or half precision 16, if the card is not BUILT and optimized for double precision it sucks at it
a good read for you my friend : https://arrayfire.com/explaining-fp64-performance-on-gpus/
If you think floating point calculation are a good measurement single and nowadays half point calculation, and please feel free to prove me wrong with some counter examples as long as the cards are not bottleneck-ed with something else such as VRAM capacity or speed, You are not going to compare for example an HD 6990 vs RX450 that doesn't make sense at all.

Nvidia cards in general are more efficient - but there are exceptions, they're a tossup at best on ETH mining, they just aren't competative at all in Monero mining where Vega blows away the hashrate of ANY Nvidia card by a wide margin and has better hash/watt when both sides are well optimized, and outside of cryptocoin MINING as such the Vega 56 can very close to MATCH the keyrate of the GTX 1080 ti on Distributed.net RC5-72 work while soaking a little less power (much better on keyrate/$ when you can find the Vega 56 at close to MSRP, tossup on keyrate/watt).

 In many cases though, even where Nvidia cards are more efficient, they are NOT "much more efficient".

I agree totally. Nothing to add here, aside the fact the 1080 TI or even the 1080 are not good example because of the latency issues with the GDDR5X memory

[QuintLeo]

My friends! Thanks for interesting in this topic! I am sorry I explained the project without the rest: I want to use solar panels in a sunny, windy and hot place. I live in a island and there is a lot of wind and sun! We use four big Diesel Engines to product electricity. It is mutch more nonsense to use megawatts for frac/Bcoins rather than low voltage, but free, for Monero or Zcash. I automated my OrangePi that it boot after the sun rises! The ARMBIAN should lounches the miner after boot. It boots with 5volts! I would like to mine some Altcoins ASIC resistant. But the only miner seems to be BFCminer. Please could anyone spend few minutes to tell me where I can find a miner for ARM processors? Many thanks and greetings from Italy!

One of strongest arm processors out there, thunderX cavium, does 51 H/s at 10W TDP (so pretty power hungry for ARM processors)

...

(just for comparison, you'll need about 120 of your processors to get same hashing power as single Vega graphic card for mining monero)

 Closer to 200 to match a Vega 56 - mine is pulling about 1960 hash with very little work attempted at tuning it (I HATE WATTMAN!), and others have reported higher.

[QuintLeo]

My "less than 300 watts" IS THE ENTIRE SYSTEM as I have already stated that's "AT THE WALL" on a system that has NOT been optimised for power consumption.
That figure is NOT "only considering the GPU load".
It's also a very NON-OPTIMAL setup in general - ONE non-optimized GPU in an old high-power-draw SINGLE CARD system.
It would be nice if you would pay attention and quit trying to prop up your strawman "THE GPU eats 250+ watts to mine with" argument with lies while ignoring presented FACTS.

What facts you've presented ZERO Facts! While I've told you I can show every review of RX Vegas  on the internet Gaming / Productivity / AND Mining even taking into consideration the lowest power consuming vega of them all mining a Vega with it system CPU at Load you get 300W+, if you change the power limite to 70% downclock the gpu and with an Intel dual core pentium doing nothing you might get the figure you are mention, a Vega 64 don't even dream about it.

 https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/74hjqn/monero_and_vega_the_definitive_guide/

 The very first link given on a Google search for "vega mining monero".

 As I already pointed out, GAMING reviews have little or nothing to do with MINING, and I have yet to see ANY mining review for Vega on Monero that came up with 200+ watts much less your CLAIMED 300+ for just the card.
 

The FACT is that 6 KW will power a lot closer to 30 Vega GPUs including total rig consumption - and possibly MORE than that - than your TOTALLY BS 17 claim.
If that "130 watt" TDP figure I've seen claimed on one "how to build it" site is correct, that would put a 4 card Vega rig right close to 600 watts - for *40* Vega GPUs in 6 KW including total system draw - while still respecting the widely reported issue of trying to get more than 4 Vegas mining Monero in a single system at high hashrates.

Again what math are you even using Serisouly it's just a simple division !  and what aload of misinformation you are giving and I'm being nice.
Here bellow a fully optimised Vega 56 rig !

The Vega rig is consuming almost a 800W or a 1000W I forgot which which !! and this is a fully optimised rig

Here is another one 3xRX Vega 56 @ 600W without the CPU Mining ! (no BIOS Mod tho)

I mean the math is easy 6000w/350w = 17 cards unless you are really downclocking and setting a very low power limite unless you are not mining with CPU unless you are using 6 Cards or more per rig unless you are using platinum power supplies you won't increase the efficiency, if you do tho all this ! and with only Vega 56 No Vega 64 you might reach an optimal 180w per card or so! and then you might get to the 30 cards, this is A LOT of IFs

Both of the systems YOU pointed to were using 200 watts per GPU - AT THE TOTAL SYSTEM LEVEL.
You know, 800 watts for 4 GPUs or 600 for 3 = 200 watts per GPU?
Yet you keep pushing your 350 watt figure, then dare to question MY MATH?

YOUR OWN QUOTED SYSTEMS PROVE MY POINT.

[kuroman]

My friends! Thanks for interesting in this topic! I am sorry I explained the project without the rest: I want to use solar panels in a sunny, windy and hot place. I live in a island and there is a lot of wind and sun! We use four big Diesel Engines to product electricity. It is mutch more nonsense to use megawatts for frac/Bcoins rather than low voltage, but free, for Monero or Zcash. I automated my OrangePi that it boot after the sun rises! The ARMBIAN should lounches the miner after boot. It boots with 5volts! I would like to mine some Altcoins ASIC resistant. But the only miner seems to be BFCminer. Please could anyone spend few minutes to tell me where I can find a miner for ARM processors? Many thanks and greetings from Italy!

One of strongest arm processors out there, thunderX cavium, does 51 H/s at 10W TDP (so pretty power hungry for ARM processors)

...

(just for comparison, you'll need about 120 of your processors to get same hashing power as single Vega graphic card for mining monero)

 Closer to 200 to match a Vega 56 - mine is pulling about 1960 hash with very little work attempted at tuning it (I HATE WATTMAN!), and others have reported higher.

Come on guys if you can't do a simple math calculation, please use a calculator : 2000H / 51H =  40 ThunderX and this number is wrong simply because on the benchmark chart it's using 4 cores instead of the full 8 cores : http://monerocoin.hu/hashrates/monero-cpu-hashrates/ scroll down. and the powerconsumption is 5w according to many websites. (won't be surprised if it reach 10W at 3Ghz tho so that figure of 10W is not surprising especially with anefficient board)

The Cavium is far from being the most powerfull or the most efficient, not only it uses old Cortex 57 cores which is an architecture from 2 years ago last year most SoC used Cortex A73 and I'm not even going to talk about custom cores, the Cavium uses also a process node from 2014 aka 28nm the SD 835 is made on a 10nm process that's a HUGE difference.

[kuroman]

 https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/74hjqn/monero_and_vega_the_definitive_guide/

 The very first link given on a Google search for "vega mining monero".

 As I already pointed out, GAMING reviews have little or nothing to do with MINING, and I have yet to see ANY mining review for Vega on Monero that came up with 200+ watts much less your CLAIMED 300+ for just the card.

Now you are playing a game of specific case.
-One You are using mining MONERO as reference.
-Two You are talking about the power consumption of the card only.
-Tree you are only talking about the RX V56
-Foor you are talking about underclocked cards.

Now go check my comments, You'll see me referencing RX Vega in general and the top number is for the 64 or the frontier edition OBVIOUSLY
Also I've talked several times about total system power consumption with CPU Mining !
 

Both of the systems YOU pointed to were using 200 watts per GPU - AT THE TOTAL SYSTEM LEVEL.
You know, 800 watts for 4 GPUs or 600 for 3 = 200 watts per GPU?
Yet you keep pushing your 350 watt figure, then dare to question MY MATH?

YOUR OWN QUOTED SYSTEMS PROVE MY POINT.

I mean the math is easy 6000w/350w = 17 cards unless you are really downclocking and setting a very low power limite or using a custom bios unless you are not mining with CPU unless you are using 6 Cards or more per rig unless you are using platinum power supplies you won't increase the efficiency , if you do tho all this ! and with only Vega 56 No Vega 64 you might reach an optimal 180w per card or so! and then you might get to the 30 cards, this is A LOT of IFs

fully optimised rig

without the CPU Mining !

At least read what I've said before and don't give me truncated replies that just being dishonnest. You have your answer in the part you are claiming.

Also where are the answers to the points you were claiming before, OpenCL / Cuda and so on.

[jeyjey]

Hi friends. Thanks for your suggestion (expecially the ). I am afraid that this thread has been transformed to a GPU NVIDIA thread.

The problem is: how to get the maximum from a Raspberry Cluster? In a far and remote island, ONLY covered by the Wi-Fi signal.

I bought an OrangePi Pc2 board from China. It has a 64 bit 4/c ARM processor and a Mali450 exacore. It costs 18$. I am planning to add five OrangePi Zero Plus that have the same H5 processor but nothing else! (very very simplest board). Its cost is less than $10 (with wi-fi antenna). After that I would install a solar panel for 500 or 1000 watts. I think to install a fan generator.

EVERY SHARE IS A FREE SHARE AFTER THE START'S COSTS ARE COVERED

Ok. Miners usually ignore the ARM hardware in Linux Operating System (Androis is covered). I only found [url:https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multi/releases]THIS MINER FOR ARM[/url]. I installed it on Armbian Distro for OrangePi and it mines!!!!! Only with the CPU, but it works!!

IT'S PERFORMARCES MAKE YOU LOUGHING: 8H/s for Monero. Ha ha ha! Yes please don't lough against me! I am trying another GPU miner that probably will take the maximum from the board! I am happy because I really want to create a lower cost machine that mines with less than 300watt! Many thanks.

[Branko]

IT'S PERFORMARCES MAKE YOU LOUGHING: 8H/s for Monero. Ha ha ha! Yes please don't lough against me! I am trying another GPU miner that probably will take the maximum from the board! I am happy because I really want to create a lower cost machine that mines with less than 300watt! Many thanks.

As someone already said, buy 30W Nvidia 750TI

[QuintLeo]

 https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/74hjqn/monero_and_vega_the_definitive_guide/

 The very first link given on a Google search for "vega mining monero".

 As I already pointed out, GAMING reviews have little or nothing to do with MINING, and I have yet to see ANY mining review for Vega on Monero that came up with 200+ watts much less your CLAIMED 300+ for just the card.

Now you are playing a game of specific case.
-One You are using mining MONERO as reference.
-Two You are talking about the power consumption of the card only.
-Tree you are only talking about the RX V56
-Foor you are talking about underclocked cards.

Now go check my comments, You'll see me referencing RX Vega in general and the top number is for the 64 or the frontier edition OBVIOUSLY
Also I've talked several times about total system power consumption with CPU Mining !
 

Both of the systems YOU pointed to were using 200 watts per GPU - AT THE TOTAL SYSTEM LEVEL.
You know, 800 watts for 4 GPUs or 600 for 3 = 200 watts per GPU?
Yet you keep pushing your 350 watt figure, then dare to question MY MATH?

YOUR OWN QUOTED SYSTEMS PROVE MY POINT.

I mean the math is easy 6000w/350w = 17 cards unless you are really downclocking and setting a very low power limite or using a custom bios unless you are not mining with CPU unless you are using 6 Cards or more per rig unless you are using platinum power supplies you won't increase the efficiency , if you do tho all this ! and with only Vega 56 No Vega 64 you might reach an optimal 180w per card or so! and then you might get to the 30 cards, this is A LOT of IFs

fully optimised rig

without the CPU Mining !

At least read what I've said before and don't give me truncated replies that just being dishonnest. You have your answer in the part you are claiming.

Also where are the answers to the points you were claiming before, OpenCL / Cuda and so on.

 I am not being dishonest.
 YOU are blowing off the facts I post in favor of "gaming" information that has been repeatedly shown to you TO BE FALSE INFORMATION.
 *THAT* is being dishonest.
 Try reading what I post instead of blowing it off IN FAVOR OF YOUR LIES.

 Unlike you, I HAVE been reading what you post - while you don't seem inclined to pay attention to ANYTHING I post, and can't even bother reading or paying attention to the few facts you have posted yourself THAT PROVE YOUR FIGURES ARE WRONG.

 People who are mining Monero on Vega are generally using the Vega 56 BECAUSE IT IS MORE EFFICIENT THAN THE Vega 64, and the FE is CRAZY EXPENSIVE like any "workstation" targeted card.
 I am NOT talking "power of the card only" in most of what I have been talking about - like THOSE SYSTEMS YOU YOURSELF POSTED.
 I am talking about underclocked cards BECAUSE THAT IS HOW VEGA MINES MONERO EFFICIENTLY - doing it any other way is BLOODY STUPID AND A WASTE OF POWER.
 YOUR OWN POST showed a system running 3 Vega cards using 600 watts at the wall - yet you KEEP POSTING THAT BOGUS BS 350 WATT PER CARD FIGURE as if it has any reality.
 I am using Monero as a reference because that is one of the very few coins that possibly CAN be mined by your SoC stuff, and it probably the coin it would be the MOST efficient at mining on - if I was using pretty much anything ELSE as a reference, your SoC stuff wouldn't be able to compete at all or even be on the same PLANET much less in the ballpark.

[kuroman]

 I am not being dishonest.
 YOU are blowing off the facts I post in favor of "gaming" information that has been repeatedly shown to you TO BE FALSE INFORMATION.
 *THAT* is being dishonest.
 Try reading what I post instead of blowing it off IN FAVOR OF YOUR LIES.

Yes you are being dishonest. Like I said before and I repeat my self I did not post only gaming figures I posted mining figures aswell, you just came out out of no where with magical numbers without backing them up.
I said RX Vega cards including 64 you say Vega only 56 mining only monero.

 Unlike you, I HAVE been reading what you post - while you don't seem inclined to pay attention to ANYTHING I post, and can't even bother reading or paying attention to the few facts you have posted yourself THAT PROVE YOUR FIGURES ARE WRONG.

You did not you didn't prove me wrong at any point, what you are doing is that you keep telling your self is that, You come with a specific case and say Oh look my "vega 56 monero mining consume this" and You say oh you say I'm wrong
You are totally wrong, I keep saying it, 350W ish is a correct figure if you take in consideration a rig of 3 cards cpu/gpu mining This is a normal case scenario and it is correct for people that use Vega 56 and 64 it's an average number not some specific bullshit
As for the number I posted, I posted the number in all honesty showing what the cards consume in different case scenario in different configuration and in the best case scenario aka full optimised build, vega 56 downclocked and undervolted mining OS and special Bios. I'm not stupid and I know my math you seems to not do so and prove wrong several times.

People who are mining Monero on Vega are generally using the Vega 56 BECAUSE IT IS MORE EFFICIENT THAN THE Vega 64, and the FE is CRAZY EXPENSIVE like any "workstation" targeted card.
 I am NOT talking "power of the card only" in most of what I have been talking about - like THOSE SYSTEMS YOU YOURSELF POSTED.
 I am talking about underclocked cards BECAUSE THAT IS HOW VEGA MINES MONERO EFFICIENTLY - doing it any other way is BLOODY STUPID AND A WASTE OF POWER.
 YOUR OWN POST showed a system running 3 Vega cards using 600 watts at the wall - yet you KEEP POSTING THAT BOGUS BS 350 WATT PER CARD FIGURE as if it has any reality.
 I am using Monero as a reference because that is one of the very few coins that possibly CAN be mined by your SoC stuff, and it probably the coin it would be the MOST efficient at mining on - if I was using pretty much anything ELSE as a reference, your SoC stuff wouldn't be able to compete at all or even be on the same PLANET much less in the ballpark.

What I've been saying Look specific use case, Fully optimized, Vega 56, Monero and power consumption per card without factoring a full system with GPU mining. Look here I invite you to read again my posts, and read really well and You'll figure out, maybe and I hope so, that I'm not talking about a specific card, a specific crypto... aka at one case scenarion, but giving an Average with a system being used at it full potential, like I do with my system for example I mean with CPU and GPU at the same time! since I have an I7 8700K and Vega64.

Also why I have Vega 64 simply because 56 is as expensive if not more expensive than the 64 here right now it was a no brainer for me especially I don't use my desktop as a full time mining rig.

[QuintLeo]

Kuroman, since you refuse to bother paying attention to anything I have posted, and refuse to even pay attention to the information YOU YOURSELF HAVE POSTED that refutes your "17 cards for 6k" garbage, I refuse to point out your ERRORS AND MISTAKES AND LIES any more.
There is no point in my beating my head against the stone wall of your STUPIDITY any more to try to break through it with the FACTS.

 Don't bother spewing at me any more, you are going on ignore.

[kuroman]

Kuroman, since you refuse to bother paying attention to anything I have posted, and refuse to even pay attention to the information YOU YOURSELF HAVE POSTED that refutes your "17 cards for 6k" garbage, I refuse to point out your ERRORS AND MISTAKES AND LIES any more.
There is no point in my beating my head against the stone wall of your STUPIDITY any more to try to break through it with the FACTS.

 Don't bother spewing at me any more, you are going on ignore.

So now you can't argue your refute to insults ? you didn't post a single fact, a single reputable source, nothing, I've even had to correct and teach you a couple of things about ARMs.

Anyway just saying don't be too rude to others if you don't agree to them, but glade had to to correct a couple of your misconception about the latest ARM SoC, even if we don't agree about the power consumption, but you really should work on your temper.

[x_acidburn_x]

I'm currently running cpu multi miner on RaspberryPi 3 with raspbain lite. Each card will run around 25 hashes per second using the ARM possessor only. This requires alot of code optimization but it can be done. Unfortunately the RaspberryPi GPU lacks support for miners to develop software for, however you can mine on the Mali450 GPU found on the OrangePi and Tinkerboard. At this point all Mali GPU miners are modified from existing software with no official support. I just ordered my first OrangePi so I can't speak from personal experience but I've been told you can get up to 50 hashes from the gpu.... add the 25 from the ARM processor and that's not a bad result from $17-$35 hardware that consumes about 3 watts.

[Branko]

I'm currently running cpu multi miner on RaspberryPi 3 with raspbain lite. Each card will run around 25 hashes per second using the ARM possessor only. This requires alot of code optimization but it can be done. Unfortunately the RaspberryPi GPU lacks support for miners to develop software for, however you can mine on the Mali450 GPU found on the OrangePi and Tinkerboard. At this point all Mali GPU miners are modified from existing software with no official support. I just ordered my first OrangePi so I can't speak from personal experience but I've been told you can get up to 50 hashes from the gpu.... add the 25 from the ARM processor and that's not a bad result from $17-$35 hardware that consumes about 3 watts.

But how those 75 hashes compare to 30 MEGAhashes from RX570?

[x_acidburn_x]

I'm currently running cpu multi miner on RaspberryPi 3 with raspbain lite. Each card will run around 25 hashes per second using the ARM possessor only. This requires alot of code optimization but it can be done. Unfortunately the RaspberryPi GPU lacks support for miners to develop software for, however you can mine on the Mali450 GPU found on the OrangePi and Tinkerboard. At this point all Mali GPU miners are modified from existing software with no official support. I just ordered my first OrangePi so I can't speak from personal experience but I've been told you can get up to 50 hashes from the gpu.... add the 25 from the ARM processor and that's not a bad result from $17-$35 hardware that consumes about 3 watts.

But how those 75 hashes compare to 30 MEGAhashes from RX570?

How does $500 compare to $17?.....