xcrowd (OP)
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:03:30 PM |
|
Your calculations are still wrong I have the largest systems for each category, price being 10*1099=10990 16*999=15984 Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place. In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it. According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table. At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what. But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs.
|
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:08:26 PM |
|
Your calculations are still wrong I have the largest systems for each category, price being 10*1099=10990 16*999=15984 Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place. In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it. According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table. At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what. But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs. So an Olympus with 8 blades will hash at 1200Ghs and will cost 7992USD if paid upfront?
|
|
|
|
xcrowd (OP)
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:11:35 PM |
|
Your calculations are still wrong I have the largest systems for each category, price being 10*1099=10990 16*999=15984 Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place. In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it. According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table. At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what. But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs. So an Olympus with 8 blades will hash at 1200Ghs and will cost 7992USD if paid upfront? Yes, excluding shipping and PSU option prices; which will be announced on our launch and on our website.
|
|
|
|
fiktionist
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:44:49 PM |
|
Your calculations are still wrong I have the largest systems for each category, price being 10*1099=10990 16*999=15984 Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place. In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it. According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table. At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what. But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs. So an Olympus with 8 blades will hash at 1200Ghs and will cost 7992USD if paid upfront? Yes, excluding shipping and PSU option prices; which will be announced on our launch and on our website. And that launch is tomorrow?
|
liked that post? Official BeerAdress: 12Q9d7tntiQXARjpVSRKnQhzJy4MoAaonL
|
|
|
xcrowd (OP)
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:54:40 PM |
|
Your calculations are still wrong I have the largest systems for each category, price being 10*1099=10990 16*999=15984 Maybe I'm being dense, I really am not seeing where I went wrong. Just want to make sure everything is in the right place. In one of the xCrowd topics it was established that each blade is 75GH/s, which might not be the case, but it looks like it. According to your calculations each blade is 150GH/s Maybe you should wait until more information is presented and then include them in your table. At the moment there are 2 sets of prices and it is unclear which one is for what. But one this is sure: there is no way 2400GH/s would cost 16K USD All blades for our larger two models will hash at a minimum of 150GH/s per blade at stock clock rates. The past prices per GH is set by the market; not the actual production costs. So an Olympus with 8 blades will hash at 1200Ghs and will cost 7992USD if paid upfront? Yes, excluding shipping and PSU option prices; which will be announced on our launch and on our website. And that launch is tomorrow? We were hoping to launch it today (sat). However it has been delayed so that we would be able to get rid of all the vulnerabilities that some script kids were trying to exploit. We will be keeping everyone up to date through twitter and on this forum.
|
|
|
|
eve
|
|
August 10, 2013, 03:58:40 PM |
|
if your prizes can go much lower the better. i mean lower than what was stated.
|
|
|
|
WastedLTC
|
|
August 10, 2013, 08:13:45 PM |
|
Wow.. very interested in what you will be offering. Sounds like you are going to blow away current pricing models which will get you serious attention.
Hopefully the hashing rate will spike and start to level off (grow at 10-15% and not 25-35%) by the time you release.
|
|
|
|
xcrowd (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2013, 12:06:12 AM Last edit: August 11, 2013, 01:12:19 AM by xcrowd |
|
|
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
August 11, 2013, 12:31:12 AM |
|
I've always found it very unprofessional to have serious grammatical mistakes in official correspondence. "We do appreciate your patients" - Really? Get someone who can write proper english and make him proofread your website And the contrast on that image is horrible, makes it very hard to read. Little details, but they kind of create the initial impression.
|
|
|
|
xcrowd (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2013, 12:35:36 AM |
|
Received the email however it was extremely hard to read because of the font/color choice.
Thanks for the feedback. We'll use a different colour/font for future updates. Where you reading it on your mobile or a larger screen (tablet/laptop etc)? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
xcrowd (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2013, 12:39:14 AM Last edit: August 11, 2013, 01:24:39 AM by xcrowd |
|
I've always found it very unprofessional to have serious grammatical mistakes in official correspondence. "We do appreciate your patients" - Really? Get someone who can write proper english and make him proofread your website And the contrast on that image is horrible, makes it very hard to read. Little details, but they kind of create the initial impression. Patients... We have to apologise for contrast and it seems like we dropped the ball on this one. Definitely not something we would have wanted published. We will be sending out a clearer copy asap.
|
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
August 11, 2013, 12:43:36 AM |
|
Patients...
Patients = People receiving or registered to receive medical treatment. Patience = The capacity to accept or tolerate delay, trouble, or suffering without getting angry or upset.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinarnold
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
August 11, 2013, 01:12:41 AM |
|
this is going to be xScam.
Everyone have patients
|
|
|
|
eve
|
|
August 11, 2013, 01:37:17 AM Last edit: August 11, 2013, 01:49:06 AM by eve |
|
way to expensive per gh/s. no proper office and contact numbers. no prototype or demo unit to show. If you have the funding go produce a working unit to show rather than collecting pre order money through escrow.
in the 1st place you have the funds to produced the units why need to collect pre order money through escrow? if you collect partial deposits and the rest when payments is due that may be more acceptable. who wants all of our funds to be tied up for 3 months.?
|
|
|
|
xcrowd (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2013, 01:45:33 AM |
|
Received the email however it was extremely hard to read because of the font/color choice.
Thanks for the feedback. We'll use a different colour/font for future updates. Where you reading it on your mobile or a larger screen (tablet/laptop etc)? Thanks in advance. 21" Monitor through Gmail. Even the new one is hard to read via Gmail. However it comes up fairly clear on this forum post. Screenshot Cheers. It came out quite readable on our test but we'll be looking into how to resolve this for future updates. Thanks for the screenshot. way to expensive per gh/s. no proper office and contact numbers. no prototype or demo unit to show. If you have the funding go produce a working unit to show rather than collecting pre order money through escrow.
Getting a working ASIC takes quite a while unfortunately. New startups such as KNC have just demonstrated a FPGA and neither have any of the other newcomers. You are more than welcome in waiting until we have the first test batch before considering us over the other pre-order options.
|
|
|
|
Anenome5
|
|
August 11, 2013, 01:51:38 AM |
|
Cheers. It came out quite readable on our test but we'll be looking into how to resolve this for future updates.
Who is 'we'? Who even are you? What's your name and position in the company? What's your Skype number? Who in the community has talked to you? What's your bona fides? I know who Josh/BFL, Yifu/Avalon was and even Sam/KNC, who are you?
|
Democracy is the original 51% attack.
|
|
|
eve
|
|
August 11, 2013, 01:53:47 AM |
|
In a way we thought yours has the lowest face value, but on the contrary we are wrong others in this time frame got much lower prices than yours. we think below 5 but above 3
|
|
|
|
xcrowd (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2013, 02:03:21 AM |
|
Cheers. It came out quite readable on our test but we'll be looking into how to resolve this for future updates.
Who is 'we'? Who even are you? What's your name and position in the company? What's your Skype number? Who in the community has talked to you? What's your bona fides? I know who Josh/BFL, Yifu/Avalon was and even Sam/KNC, who are you? We haven't published anything on the company for the same reason we have limited the released details on our line-up. Since we aren't taking direct payments from the public we reserve the right to disclose (& avoid getting doxed) what we want and when we deem it necessary.
|
|
|
|
southerngentuk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 254
Sugars.zone | DatingFi - Earn for Posting
|
|
August 11, 2013, 02:26:27 AM |
|
You have a launch date. What are you launching? Website? Preorder? Order? Can orders be collected from you uk office?
|
SUGAR | | | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | | | | | | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | ███████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████ ██████ ██████ ██████ ▄████▀ ██████ ██████▄▄▄███▀ ▄█ ██████ ██████████▀ ▄███ ██████ ████████▀ ▄█████▄▄▄██████ ██████▀ ▄███████▀▀▀██████ ██████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████ ██████ ██████ ███████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████ | . Backed By ZetaChain | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | | ██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██
██ ██ | | | |
|
|
|
eve
|
|
August 11, 2013, 02:32:29 AM |
|
You have a launch date. What are you launching? Website? Preorder? Order? Can orders be collected from you uk office?
They don't have an office only a postal address for receiving mails. A lot of secrets hasn't been reveal ?
|
|
|
|
|