|
Diapolo (OP)
|
 |
July 11, 2011, 07:34:21 PM |
|
Thanks for the hard work, sent you another donation. 456.75Mh/sec up to 458.88 with the last update on overclocked 5870's running at 1000/347.
Sounds great, I hope jedi95 will include this kernel or parts of it in a new Phoenix version  . I guess quite a few people don't know about this mod. Thanks for your support Bert! Dia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
being
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 11, 2011, 08:58:34 PM
Last edit: July 11, 2011, 09:26:49 PM by being |
|
Thanks a lot for this. Really great work! I've been using/testing it on and off with my poclbm (because I get high CPU usage with phoenix) on my windows 7 32bit, cat 11.6 (not b), SDK 2.1, HD5870 rig. This is the kernel I got 460Mhash/s with. The only problem is, that at times it has been a bit unstable with my setup. Hoping this last version (07-11) will be stable enough, so I can use it 24/7. =) Thank you for the hard work! =) |
|
|
|
|
KKAtan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2011, 05:35:17 AM |
|
Amazing. You managed to solve the previous regression of 6870 performance as well. Everything is perfect now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2011, 09:38:52 AM |
|
With the ideas that user Vince gave to us in the other thread, I was able to lower the ALU OP usage even further. This means next version will speed up things for 69XX and 58XX again . Edit: Drawback is, that you will need to replace the Phoenix __init__.py file, so it won't be easy usable for non Phoenix users, sorry for that (some init values changed)! Dia |
|
|
|
|
nebiki
|
|
July 12, 2011, 05:49:56 PM |
|
i don't know why, but i lose 2Mhash/s going from 07-07 -> 07-11
|
|
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2011, 05:57:48 PM |
|
i don't know why, but i lose 2Mhash/s going from 07-07 -> 07-11
You can always return to the previous version, what's your setup? Dia |
|
|
|
|
navigator
|
|
July 12, 2011, 09:42:05 PM
Last edit: September 11, 2011, 09:36:57 PM by navigator |
|
DELETED for privacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
actudoran
|
|
July 13, 2011, 08:07:23 AM
Last edit: July 13, 2011, 08:48:37 AM by actudoran |
|
hi and thanks for the great work! I got a real issue now ... I worked with your latest krenel and everything was peachy 315 mhas on the hot one and pushed the other to 330 mhas on sapphire 5830 with : phoenix -u http://XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:8332 VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT -k phatk DEVICE=1 however, now device 0 works fine no probs, but device 1 won't work ... it says failed to load krenel BFI_INT something ... I remove the bfi and then it says just failed to load krenel ... any advice ? Thanks! Alex |
|
|
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2011, 08:29:30 AM |
|
hi and thanks for the great work! I got a real issue now ... I worked with your latest krenel and everything was peachy 315 mhas on the hot one and pushed the other to 330 mhas on sapphire 5830 with : phoenix -u http://Oana1:h0m3@pool.bitclockers.com:8332 VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT -k phatk DEVICE=1 however, now device 0 works fine no probs, but device 1 won't work ... it says failed to load krenel BFI_INT something ... I remove the bfi and then it says just failed to load krenel ... any advice ? Thanks! Alex Try: phoenix -u http://Oana1:h0m3@pool.bitclockers.com:8332 -k phatk AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false VECTORS WORKSIZE=256 Perhaps it was just the ordering of parameters? Dia |
|
|
|
|
actudoran
|
|
July 13, 2011, 08:49:40 AM |
|
tried that ... didn't work
it's funny since just yesterday was ok ... then I had to reboot then didn't work for GPU 1 ...
I'm running win 7 64 if that's any help ...
Thanks, Alex
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bert
|
|
July 13, 2011, 10:50:34 AM |
|
Does the card still show up under Catayist Control Center/Information/hardware as a secondary card.
|
Tip jar: 1BW6kXgUjGrFTqEpyP8LpVEPQDLTkbATZ6
|
|
|
bcheck555
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2011, 11:57:26 AM |
|
Thanks for these patches, current numbers:
Catalyst v11.6; SDK v2.4
5830: 321Mhash/s
1000Mhz/350Mhz/1.15v; air cooled temps ~60c; -k phatk AGGRESSION=13 VECTORS BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
6950: 368Mhash/s
900Mhz/775Mhz/1.15v; air cooled temps ~65c; -k phatk AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2011, 12:13:05 PM |
|
Thanks for these patches, current numbers:
Catalyst v11.6; SDK v2.4
5830: 321Mhash/s
1000Mhz/350Mhz/1.15v; air cooled temps ~60c; -k phatk AGGRESSION=13 VECTORS BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
6950: 368Mhash/s
900Mhz/775Mhz/1.15v; air cooled temps ~65c; -k phatk AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128
Sounds great, your 5830 scores are just like mine . Dia |
|
|
|
|
nebiki
|
|
July 13, 2011, 01:52:33 PM |
|
i don't know why, but i lose 2Mhash/s going from 07-07 -> 07-11
You can always return to the previous version, what's your setup? Dia i've added vince's mod now and am running better than 07-07. 6950 with unlocked shaders, running at 425 Mhash/s at 1.1V now. if i think back to when i had 380 at higher power consumption.. all these tweaks are sure worth it. keep 'em coming |
|
|
|
|
actudoran
|
|
July 13, 2011, 05:31:13 PM |
|
Great job Dia ! btw ... reinstalled the lot ... even had a bug in recovery so was screwed ... whoooshhh ... press any key to boot from CD  Works every time! Before acting up ... wierd ... it dropped a lot in temperature under full load from like 75 - 76 C to about 68 C ( GPU 0 that is gpu1 was idle since the bug ... funny is that GPU1 is the cold one on mine ... GPU 0 is about 5 C hotter since closer to the CPU ( big ol' 775 lump churning out heat ) Cheers guys ! Al |
|
|
|
|
ditchmagnet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2011, 06:49:10 AM |
|
Really loving this kernel! Looking forward to the next release!
So does the 11.7 preview give much of a performance increase with this? Currently getting about 329 Mhash/s @ 1030/350 on 5830 Xtremes.
|
|
|
|
|
ssateneth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1004
|
|
July 14, 2011, 08:35:31 AM |
|
Really loving this kernel! Looking forward to the next release!
So does the 11.7 preview give much of a performance increase with this? Currently getting about 329 Mhash/s @ 1030/350 on 5830 Xtremes.
I'm assuming you jumped on the newegg bandwagon too? I just started (wasnt aware of a dummy plug so I only have 2 running tonight, will have 5 after dummy plugs), and I can only get 970/300 stable @ 100% fan and 1.195 core. Temperatures are 78c., 309 mhash How can you push the core so far? Did I just get a bad card? ty in advance |
|
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2011, 08:54:54 AM |
|
Really loving this kernel! Looking forward to the next release!
So does the 11.7 preview give much of a performance increase with this? Currently getting about 329 Mhash/s @ 1030/350 on 5830 Xtremes.
I'm assuming you jumped on the newegg bandwagon too? I just started (wasnt aware of a dummy plug so I only have 2 running tonight, will have 5 after dummy plugs), and I can only get 970/300 stable @ 100% fan and 1.195 core. Temperatures are 78c., 309 mhash How can you push the core so far? Did I just get a bad card? ty in advance Well, my 5830 runs @ 1000 / 350 and I did never need to use 100% FAN speed. What are your temps? Is the case good ventilated / enough airflow? Dia Edit: WOHOOOO 100 postings  ! |
|
|
|
ssateneth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1004
|
|
July 14, 2011, 09:04:14 AM |
|
if you tried to read my post, i said 78c.
also airflow should be fine, got a ton of fans sucking in air. maybe I should take off the plastic shell so the metal fins are exposed?
Noise also isn't an issue, they'll all be tucked away somewhere where I can't hear them. The difference in power between 70% fan and 100% fan is also negligible, seeing that they may only use 2 watts max at full power, if that.
|
|
|
|
|
Diapolo (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2011, 09:09:48 AM |
|
if you tried to read my post, i said 78c.
also airflow should be fine, got a ton of fans sucking in air. maybe I should take off the plastic shell so the metal fins are exposed?
Noise also isn't an issue, they'll all be tucked away somewhere where I can't hear them. The difference in power between 70% fan and 100% fan is also negligible, seeing that they may only use 2 watts max at full power, if that.
I tried, but not hard enough :-P ... sorry. 78c does not seem right, I have 77c with 1000 / 350 and Fan @ 72%. Dia |
|
|
|
|
