| 
							Diapolo (OP)
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 11, 2011, 07:34:21 PM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Thanks for the hard work, sent you another donation. 456.75Mh/sec up to 458.88 with the last update on overclocked 5870's running at 1000/347.
  Sounds great, I hope jedi95 will include this kernel or parts of it in a new Phoenix version   . I guess quite a few people don't know about this mod. Thanks for your support Bert! Dia  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								
							being
							
								Newbie 
								 
								  Offline
								Activity: 38 
								Merit: 0
								
								
								
								
								  
							 
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 11, 2011, 08:58:34 PM Last edit: July 11, 2011, 09:26:49 PM by being  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Thanks a lot for this. Really great work! I've been using/testing it on and off with my poclbm (because I get high CPU usage with phoenix) on my windows 7 32bit, cat 11.6 (not b), SDK 2.1, HD5870 rig. This is the kernel  I got 460Mhash/s with.   The only problem is, that at times it has been a bit unstable with my setup. Hoping this last version (07-11) will be stable enough, so I can use it 24/7. =) Thank you for the hard work! =)  
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								
							KKAtan
							
								Newbie 
								 
								  Offline
								Activity: 50 
								Merit: 0
								
								
								
								
								  
							 
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 12, 2011, 05:35:17 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Amazing. You managed to solve the  previous regression of 6870 performance as well. Everything is perfect now.  
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							Diapolo (OP)
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 12, 2011, 09:38:52 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							With the ideas that user Vince gave to us in the other thread, I was able to lower the ALU OP usage even further. This means next version will speed up things for 69XX and 58XX again   . Edit: Drawback is, that you will need to replace the Phoenix __init__.py file, so it won't be easy usable for non Phoenix users, sorry for that (some init values changed)! Dia  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							nebiki
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 12, 2011, 05:49:56 PM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							i don't know why, but i lose 2Mhash/s going from 07-07 -> 07-11 
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							Diapolo (OP)
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 12, 2011, 05:57:48 PM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							i don't know why, but i lose 2Mhash/s going from 07-07 -> 07-11
  You can always return to the previous version, what's your setup? Dia  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							navigator
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 12, 2011, 09:42:05 PM Last edit: September 11, 2011, 09:36:57 PM by navigator  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							DELETED for privacy 
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							actudoran
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 13, 2011, 08:07:23 AM Last edit: July 13, 2011, 08:48:37 AM by actudoran  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							hi and thanks for the great work! I got a real issue now ... I worked with your latest krenel and everything was peachy 315 mhas on the hot one and pushed the other to 330 mhas on sapphire 5830 with : phoenix -u  http://XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:8332 VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT -k phatk DEVICE=1 however, now device 0 works fine no probs, but device 1 won't work ... it says failed to load krenel BFI_INT something ... I remove the bfi and then it says just failed to load krenel ...  any advice ? Thanks! Alex  
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							Diapolo (OP)
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 13, 2011, 08:29:30 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							hi and thanks for the great work! I got a real issue now ... I worked with your latest krenel and everything was peachy 315 mhas on the hot one and pushed the other to 330 mhas on sapphire 5830 with : phoenix -u  http://Oana1:h0m3@pool.bitclockers.com:8332 VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT -k phatk DEVICE=1 however, now device 0 works fine no probs, but device 1 won't work ... it says failed to load krenel BFI_INT something ... I remove the bfi and then it says just failed to load krenel ...  any advice ? Thanks! Alex Try: phoenix -u  http://Oana1:h0m3@pool.bitclockers.com:8332 -k phatk AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false VECTORS WORKSIZE=256 Perhaps it was just the ordering of parameters? Dia  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							actudoran
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 13, 2011, 08:49:40 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							tried that ... didn't work
  it's funny since just yesterday was ok ... then I had to reboot then didn't work  for GPU 1 ... 
 
  I'm running win 7 64 if that's any help ... 
  Thanks, Alex 
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							Bert
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 13, 2011, 10:50:34 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Does the card still show up under Catayist Control Center/Information/hardware as a secondary card.  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							Tip jar: 1BW6kXgUjGrFTqEpyP8LpVEPQDLTkbATZ6 
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								
							bcheck555
							
								Newbie 
								 
								  Offline
								Activity: 5 
								Merit: 0
								
								
								
								
								  
							 
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 13, 2011, 11:57:26 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Thanks for these patches, current numbers:
  Catalyst v11.6; SDK v2.4 5830: 321Mhash/s 1000Mhz/350Mhz/1.15v; air cooled temps ~60c;  -k phatk AGGRESSION=13 VECTORS BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
  6950: 368Mhash/s 900Mhz/775Mhz/1.15v; air cooled temps ~65c;  -k phatk AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							Diapolo (OP)
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 13, 2011, 12:13:05 PM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Thanks for these patches, current numbers:
  Catalyst v11.6; SDK v2.4 5830: 321Mhash/s 1000Mhz/350Mhz/1.15v; air cooled temps ~60c;  -k phatk AGGRESSION=13 VECTORS BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
  6950: 368Mhash/s 900Mhz/775Mhz/1.15v; air cooled temps ~65c;  -k phatk AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS BFI_INT DEVICE=1 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128
  Sounds great, your 5830 scores are just like mine   . Dia  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							nebiki
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 13, 2011, 01:52:33 PM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							i don't know why, but i lose 2Mhash/s going from 07-07 -> 07-11
  You can always return to the previous version, what's your setup? Dia i've added vince's mod now and am running better than 07-07. 6950 with unlocked shaders, running at 425 Mhash/s at 1.1V now. if i think back to when i had 380 at higher power consumption.. all these tweaks are sure worth it. keep 'em coming  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							actudoran
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 13, 2011, 05:31:13 PM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Great job Dia ! btw ... reinstalled the lot ... even had a bug in recovery so was screwed ... whoooshhh ... press any key to boot from CD    Works every time! Before acting up ... wierd ... it dropped a lot in temperature under full load from like 75 - 76 C to about 68 C ( GPU 0 that is gpu1 was idle since the bug ... funny is that GPU1 is the cold one on mine ... GPU 0 is about 5 C hotter since closer to the CPU ( big ol' 775 lump churning out heat ) Cheers guys ! Al  
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								
							ditchmagnet
							
								Newbie 
								 
								  Offline
								Activity: 61 
								Merit: 0
								
								
								
								
								  
							 
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 14, 2011, 06:49:10 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Really loving this kernel!  Looking forward to the next release!
  So does the 11.7 preview give much of a performance increase with this?  Currently getting about 329 Mhash/s @ 1030/350 on 5830 Xtremes. 
						 | 
					 
					
						| 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								
							ssateneth
							
								Legendary 
								 
								  Offline
								Activity: 1344 
								Merit: 1004
								 
								
								
								
								
								 
							 
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 14, 2011, 08:35:31 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Really loving this kernel!  Looking forward to the next release!
  So does the 11.7 preview give much of a performance increase with this?  Currently getting about 329 Mhash/s @ 1030/350 on 5830 Xtremes.
  I'm assuming you jumped on the newegg bandwagon too? I just started (wasnt aware of a dummy plug so I only have 2 running tonight, will have 5 after dummy plugs), and I can only get 970/300 stable @ 100% fan and 1.195 core. Temperatures are 78c., 309 mhash How can you push the core so far? Did I just get a bad card? ty in advance  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							Diapolo (OP)
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 14, 2011, 08:54:54 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							Really loving this kernel!  Looking forward to the next release!
  So does the 11.7 preview give much of a performance increase with this?  Currently getting about 329 Mhash/s @ 1030/350 on 5830 Xtremes.
  I'm assuming you jumped on the newegg bandwagon too? I just started (wasnt aware of a dummy plug so I only have 2 running tonight, will have 5 after dummy plugs), and I can only get 970/300 stable @ 100% fan and 1.195 core. Temperatures are 78c., 309 mhash How can you push the core so far? Did I just get a bad card? ty in advance Well, my 5830 runs @ 1000 / 350 and I did never need to use 100% FAN speed. What are your temps? Is the case good ventilated / enough airflow? Dia Edit: WOHOOOO 100 postings   !  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								
							ssateneth
							
								Legendary 
								 
								  Offline
								Activity: 1344 
								Merit: 1004
								 
								
								
								
								
								 
							 
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 14, 2011, 09:04:14 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							if you tried to read my post, i said 78c.
  also airflow should be fine, got a ton of fans sucking in air. maybe I should take off the plastic shell so the metal fins are exposed? Noise also isn't an issue, they'll all be tucked away somewhere where I can't hear them. The difference in power between 70% fan and 100% fan is also negligible, seeing that they may only use 2 watts max at full power, if that. 
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
		
		
			
				
					
								| 
							Diapolo (OP)
							
						 | 
								
							
								  | 
								
												
												 July 14, 2011, 09:09:48 AM  | 
										  
								 | 
							  
									  
							if you tried to read my post, i said 78c.
  also airflow should be fine, got a ton of fans sucking in air. maybe I should take off the plastic shell so the metal fins are exposed? Noise also isn't an issue, they'll all be tucked away somewhere where I can't hear them. The difference in power between 70% fan and 100% fan is also negligible, seeing that they may only use 2 watts max at full power, if that.
  I tried, but not hard enough :-P ... sorry. 78c does not seem right, I have 77c with 1000 / 350 and Fan @ 72%. Dia  
						 | 
					 
					
						
							
							 
							
						 | 
					 
				 
			 |  
		 
	 | 
	 |