Sorry, can't follow up on this in detail[1]. What's your criteria for tagging? I see that some are tagged while others aren't.
[1] There is too much to tag everywhere!
I need to find additional reasons to tag outside of these links. Some are easier for me to personally make a decision on, and I haven't looked at all of them (maybe only half), but just the wallet link requires me to seek more reasons to be confident in my feedback. Regardless, these should all be public for others to make their own determinations, which is why I posted them before really doing my own review beforehand. I started looking at the largest groups initially then eventually shifted my time to the script itself but unfortunately have not had much time recently to continue that either - holidays & life/work responsibilities.
The next few weeks should clear up more time for me to devote. For the accounts a little harder to make a decision on, I'd like to incorporate looking through the post history of those that are found as potential wallet links and doing an analysis on it similar to the one that was done on QS, and may look into automating a 3rd piece of supporting evidence which will analyze some other details about prior posts... the first 2 may be enough for me though. And, if I'm confident enough in the automated results, I will make the feedback process a little easier for myself on tagging them.
