Bitcoin Forum
September 27, 2018, 11:12:52 PM *
News: ♦♦ New info! Bitcoin Core users absolutely must upgrade to previously-announced 0.16.3 [Torrent]. All Bitcoin users should temporarily trust confirmations slightly less. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Bitcoin Forum > Bitcoin > Development & Technical Discussion (Moderators: gmaxwell, achow101) > Do we need SIGHASH_MULTIPLE for some advance contract?
Pages: [1]
« previous topic next topic »
  Print  
Author Topic: Do we need SIGHASH_MULTIPLE for some advance contract?  (Read 601 times)
jl2012
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010


View Profile
July 09, 2013, 04:25:22 PM
 #1
Currently, we have SIGHASH_ALL (sign all outputs, the default), SIGHASH_NONE (sign none of the outputs) and, SIGHASH_SINGLE (sign one of the outputs). However, it seems there is no mechanism for user to sign more than one, but not all outputs. For some advanced contracts, one may want to specify multiple but not all outputs. Do we need a SIGHASH_MULTIPLE for this, or could we accomplish this with current code?
Donation address: 374iXxS4BuqFHsEwwxUuH3nvJ69Y7Hqur3 (Bitcoin ONLY)
LRDGENPLYrcTRssGoZrsCT1hngaH3BVkM4 (LTC)
PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
1538089972
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538089972

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538089972
1538089972
Reply with quote  #2
1538089972
Report to moderator
Make a difference with your Ether.
Donate Ether for the greater good.
SPRING.WETRUST.IO
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1538089972
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538089972

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538089972
1538089972
Reply with quote  #2
1538089972
Report to moderator
1538089972
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538089972

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538089972
1538089972
Reply with quote  #2
1538089972
Report to moderator
1538089972
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538089972

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538089972
1538089972
Reply with quote  #2
1538089972
Report to moderator
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 2520
Merit: 1514



View Profile
July 09, 2013, 04:29:39 PM
 #2
It seems weird, but I've never been able to come up with a case that couldn't be handled by the current flags plus some small number of preparatory transactions. I'd be interested in seeing if anyone can come up with one.
 
Bitcoin will not be compromised
jl2012
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010


View Profile
July 09, 2013, 04:35:56 PM
 #3
Quote from: gmaxwell on July 09, 2013, 04:29:39 PM
It seems weird, but I've never been able to come up with a case that couldn't be handled by the current flags plus some small number of preparatory transactions. I'd be interested in seeing if anyone can come up with one.
 

Do you mean using multiple SIGHASH_ONE inupts?
Donation address: 374iXxS4BuqFHsEwwxUuH3nvJ69Y7Hqur3 (Bitcoin ONLY)
LRDGENPLYrcTRssGoZrsCT1hngaH3BVkM4 (LTC)
PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
Mike Hearn
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1006


View Profile
July 09, 2013, 05:52:04 PM
 #4
I think you would just have multiple inputs owned by yourself and use SIGHASH_SINGLE. But Gregory is right. I never found a use case for that either (nor most of the script opcodes).
jackjack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1013


May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage


View Profile
July 09, 2013, 09:28:40 PM
 #5
I proposed it too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=212555.0
Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2
Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Bitcoin Forum > Bitcoin > Development & Technical Discussion (Moderators: gmaxwell, achow101) > Do we need SIGHASH_MULTIPLE for some advance contract?
 « previous topic next topic »
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!